Alot of people feel.....

[OleMarxco]

...Is apparantly enough! Or is it? :o:
This is a simple question yet puzzles me how to cut it down raw.
I've more or less seen myself that it's not that simple and a social
revolution removes alot of unnessecities and burden's to society,
atleast when we have to defend those politics of welfare against
market-libertarians, and plus, the commodity wealth relies -ALOT-
on un-renewable resources so no-one knows how much it would last :D

That's just my explanation, however, I could be wrong....
But how would you explain to a skeptic that we need to
make a new society of gift economy and communes n'stuff,
and how this society in all it's "service-driven" efficency is
not good enough? I guess they don't really care if someone
else get's richer than them if they survive - as the proletar is
egoistic as a matter of fact only - so the problem case is? ;)

How to tell that Communism is a 'necessary step'? :P
All feedback is cool :ph34r:

[Clarksist]

But how would you explain to a skeptic that we need to
make a new society of gift economy and communes n'stuff,
and how this society in all it's "service-driven" efficency is
not good enough?


Explain to them the basics of capitalist exploitation. To make as much money as business owners do, they have to take that from someone else. It doesn't appear out of thin air. So ask them how profit must be made... someone has to get screwed.

If you eliminate profit work, you eliminate a lot of time and effort by the workers, and you get shorter work days, and yet you get more. Ask the "fiscally responsible" libertarians how thats a bad thing. :lol:

That's something they can understand, and is feasible to them. Otherwise you just sort of spout out words that they have trained themselves to "drown out" with the noise from their own yelling mouths.