View Full Version : Iraq insurgents plan wave of attacks
communist mercy
20th August 2005, 15:23
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9013227/
Wurkwurk
20th August 2005, 20:27
Maybe...hopefully. But the story seems too sketchy (I'll gladly eat my words).
Ownthink
20th August 2005, 20:43
Let's hope so. Maybe then those fuckers will get out, eh?
Probably not, but still, an offensive as large as this would be disastrous for Imperialist forces in the region.
Like I said, let's hope so.
Decolonize The Left
21st August 2005, 07:34
Indeed my sentiments. I agree with wurkwurk, this does seem "sketchy", or perhaps simply too vague to mean anything concrete.
But if it's true, this will be a huge day for the people, and hopefully (to echo Ownthink), we'll "get the fuck out."
-- August
communist mercy
24th August 2005, 17:20
Could it be starting--- the final offensive to drive the Yanquis from Iraq?
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/08/24/...main/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/08/24/iraq.main/index.html)
bolshevik butcher
24th August 2005, 17:25
I think that its worht noting, this wouldnt be a military victory, it would just be that the U$ had taken too many casualties and decided to leave. As in vietnam, the tet offensive was militarily disastorus for the Viet Cong.
communist mercy
24th August 2005, 17:41
Originally posted by Clenched
[email protected] 24 2005, 04:43 PM
I think that its worht noting, this wouldnt be a military victory, it would just be that the U$ had taken too many casualties and decided to leave. As in vietnam, the tet offensive was militarily disastorus for the Viet Cong.
Yeah I understand that. There is a story about an Amerikan officer who returned to Vietnam some years after the war and met some of his adversaries. The Amerikan told them, "You know, we beat you in every encounter and in every battle." And one of the Vietnam officers responded," Yes it's true and it is also completely irrelevant."
Ownthink
24th August 2005, 20:01
Jesus, these guys fucking suck at not killing civilians. 4 police and 9 Civlians? Jesus, just kill the imperialists and those helping the imperialists.
VietMinH
24th August 2005, 20:25
As said before sounds a little too close to the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, even though the US victory then was completely irrelevant, the US isn't just gonna get up and walk away from a country they invaded. In Vietnam they were just helping the ARVN fight the NVA, and because of the hatred of the war at home they decided to leave. I doubt thats going to happen here. However, correct me if i'm wrong, i'm open to suggestions....
Decolonize The Left
24th August 2005, 23:57
I public is slowly turning on the War in Iraq. It was promised to be, well justified for one, and short, and it is neither. Lingering wars, with lingering headlines, and slow death tolls are brutal for administrations, and this could turn ugly. So far, I believe from the last Gallup pole, more than 50% of the country is opposed to the war. If this picks up to around 70% they will have to withdraw.
-- August
Kez
25th August 2005, 00:06
At the same time, we must realise that the importance of workers at home had in Vietnam, as crucially they were the ones who pulled troops out.
We must do the same. Unfortunately the ultra-lefts used the war movement as a tap demanding protest after protest, but we should organise in the unions and labour movement and student movement to organise this brutal war, and bring back the troops and end this imperialist war.
Not only should we organise to end this war, but have political meetings on why this war started, ie capitalism, and showing that to be anti-war, in reality means being anti-capitalist, hence using this war to strengthen the anti-capitalist movement here.
we can do this now, if you want to feel free to PM me.
h&s
25th August 2005, 10:15
/\ Good point /\
This 'offensive' that is planned (the US doesn't 'know' of it, they are just not stupid - its obviously going to happen) will do nothing to stop the US.
Killing innocent workers isn't going to really bother the Pentagon.
Though it may show the workers that they are the only ones who control their destiny...
Hiero
25th August 2005, 10:26
Originally posted by communist mercy+Aug 25 2005, 03:59 AM--> (communist mercy @ Aug 25 2005, 03:59 AM)
Clenched
[email protected] 24 2005, 04:43 PM
I think that its worht noting, this wouldnt be a military victory, it would just be that the U$ had taken too many casualties and decided to leave. As in vietnam, the tet offensive was militarily disastorus for the Viet Cong.
Yeah I understand that. There is a story about an Amerikan officer who returned to Vietnam some years after the war and met some of his adversaries. The Amerikan told them, "You know, we beat you in every encounter and in every battle." And one of the Vietnam officers responded," Yes it's true and it is also completely irrelevant." [/b]
Thats an awesome comeback. Do you have a source?
Kamikaze Gangbang
27th August 2005, 18:25
If those tards want to keep blowing themselves up, I'm all for it.
The U.S. military is going nowhere. :D
Ownthink
27th August 2005, 19:45
Originally posted by Kamikaze
[email protected] 27 2005, 01:43 PM
If those tards want to keep blowing themselves up, I'm all for it.
The U.S. military is going nowhere. :D
Jesus Fucking Christ, restrict this asshole now. I keep running into these stupid posts of his.
Kamikaze Gangbang
27th August 2005, 21:01
Originally posted by Ownthink+Aug 27 2005, 07:03 PM--> (Ownthink @ Aug 27 2005, 07:03 PM)
Kamikaze
[email protected] 27 2005, 01:43 PM
If those tards want to keep blowing themselves up, I'm all for it.
The U.S. military is going nowhere. :D
Jesus Fucking Christ, restrict this asshole now. I keep running into these stupid posts of his. [/b]
Restrict this asshole? BWAHAHA!!!
Wouldn't that be fascist?
You people are the biggest hypocrites on this planet.
southernmissfan
27th August 2005, 22:13
Originally posted by Kamikaze
[email protected] 27 2005, 05:43 PM
If those tards want to keep blowing themselves up, I'm all for it.
The U.S. military is going nowhere. :D
If those tards continue to invade countries to expand imperial hegemony, I hope the resistance continues to blow up as many of the goons as possible.
Kamikaze Gangbang
27th August 2005, 22:17
Originally posted by southernmissfan+Aug 27 2005, 09:31 PM--> (southernmissfan @ Aug 27 2005, 09:31 PM)
Kamikaze
[email protected] 27 2005, 05:43 PM
If those tards want to keep blowing themselves up, I'm all for it.
The U.S. military is going nowhere. :D
If those tards continue to invade countries to expand imperial hegemony, I hope the resistance continues to blow up as many of the goons as possible. [/b]
So when Saddam went into Kuwait, what was that?
Oh btw, Chomsky is considered a joke in all intellectual circles, even leftist ones. You did know that right?
It's the same phenomenon when you see WWF on TV. You think, "WHO THE FUKK WATCHES THIS SHIT?"
Lowest common denominator.
:D
Ownthink
27th August 2005, 22:19
Originally posted by Kamikaze Gangbang+Aug 27 2005, 04:19 PM--> (Kamikaze Gangbang @ Aug 27 2005, 04:19 PM)
Originally posted by
[email protected] 27 2005, 07:03 PM
Kamikaze
[email protected] 27 2005, 01:43 PM
If those tards want to keep blowing themselves up, I'm all for it.
The U.S. military is going nowhere. :D
Jesus Fucking Christ, restrict this asshole now. I keep running into these stupid posts of his.
Restrict this asshole? BWAHAHA!!!
Wouldn't that be fascist?
You people are the biggest hypocrites on this planet. [/b]
No, it would be restricting a troll who comes to a messageboard and posts stupid shit. You do know that is standard policy for most boards, right?
"You people"? Fuck you.
Please ban this idiot. He deserves it.
Kamikaze Gangbang
27th August 2005, 22:24
My posts are stupid because I disagree with you?
Man you're pathetic. And a coward! :D
southernmissfan
27th August 2005, 22:29
Originally posted by Kamikaze Gangbang+Aug 27 2005, 09:35 PM--> (Kamikaze Gangbang @ Aug 27 2005, 09:35 PM)
Originally posted by
[email protected] 27 2005, 09:31 PM
Kamikaze
[email protected] 27 2005, 05:43 PM
If those tards want to keep blowing themselves up, I'm all for it.
The U.S. military is going nowhere. :D
If those tards continue to invade countries to expand imperial hegemony, I hope the resistance continues to blow up as many of the goons as possible.
So when Saddam went into Kuwait, what was that?
Oh btw, Chomsky is considered a joke in all intellectual circles, even leftist ones. You did know that right?
It's the same phenomenon when you see WWF on TV. You think, "WHO THE FUKK WATCHES THIS SHIT?"
Lowest common denominator.
:D [/b]
What about when Saddam went into Iran? Oh wait, it was supported by the West. The US, UK, and others all supported Saddam's invasion of Iran, even giving him chemical weapons. As long as it wasn't hurting their profits, it was good. But Saddam got greedy and "got off the boat" so to speak, turning on his masters. When he attacked Kuwait, he attacked Western capitalist profits.
Why don't you look at a little history next time, before you spout your bullshit, okay?
Ownthink
27th August 2005, 22:30
Originally posted by southernmissfan+Aug 27 2005, 05:47 PM--> (southernmissfan @ Aug 27 2005, 05:47 PM)
Originally posted by Kamikaze
[email protected] 27 2005, 09:35 PM
Originally posted by
[email protected] 27 2005, 09:31 PM
Kamikaze
[email protected] 27 2005, 05:43 PM
If those tards want to keep blowing themselves up, I'm all for it.
The U.S. military is going nowhere. :D
If those tards continue to invade countries to expand imperial hegemony, I hope the resistance continues to blow up as many of the goons as possible.
So when Saddam went into Kuwait, what was that?
Oh btw, Chomsky is considered a joke in all intellectual circles, even leftist ones. You did know that right?
It's the same phenomenon when you see WWF on TV. You think, "WHO THE FUKK WATCHES THIS SHIT?"
Lowest common denominator.
:D
What about when Saddam went into Iran? Oh wait, it was supported by the West. The US, UK, and others all supported Saddam's invasion of Iran, even giving him chemical weapons. As long as it wasn't hurting their profits, it was good. But Saddam got greedy and "got off the boat" so to speak, turning on his masters. When he attacked Kuwait, he attacked Western capitalist profits.
Why don't you look at a little history next time, before you spout your bullshit, okay? [/b]
OWNED!
Morpheus
27th August 2005, 22:53
Restrict this asshole? BWAHAHA!!!
Wouldn't that be fascist?
It's only fascist when the government does it. Your'e a capitalist, you believe in private property right? From your perspective this is our private property. Your'e a guest on our property and should behave yourself. If you don't, according to your philosophy, we have the right to kick you out. When you troll here your'e committing vandalism. If you don't like that, maybe you should rethink your position on property rights.
From our perspective it's justified on the grounds that this forum is a communal space with rules agreed upon in a participatory manner. If you don't follow those democratically agreed upon rules then wer'e well within our rights to impose sanctions on you. Free association means we don't have to associate with you if we don't want to.
Morpheus
27th August 2005, 22:53
Originally posted by
[email protected] 24 2005, 07:19 PM
Jesus, these guys fucking suck at not killing civilians. 4 police and 9 Civlians? Jesus, just kill the imperialists and those helping the imperialists.
Don't trust imperialist media, this wouldn't be the first time they've reported things wrong.
Ownthink
27th August 2005, 23:16
Originally posted by
[email protected] 27 2005, 06:11 PM
Restrict this asshole? BWAHAHA!!!
Wouldn't that be fascist?
It's only fascist when the government does it. Your'e a capitalist, you believe in private property right? From your perspective this is our private property. Your'e a guest on our property and should behave yourself. If you don't, according to your philosophy, we have the right to kick you out. When you troll here your'e committing vandalism. If you don't like that, maybe you should rethink your position on property rights.
From our perspective it's justified on the grounds that this forum is a communal space with rules agreed upon in a participatory manner. If you don't follow those democratically agreed upon rules then wer'e well within our rights to impose sanctions on you. Free association means we don't have to associate with you if we don't want to.
Owned again.
Don't trust imperialist media, this wouldn't be the first time they've reported things wrong.
True. *checks Al Jazeera*
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.