View Full Version : I am Comrade Jesus
Comrade Jesus
9th August 2005, 00:33
Hello my Comrades,
Just stopping by letting all you fine people know even Christ is communist. Throw everything away and join me for ever lasting happiness.
Hasta la victoria siempre.
~Comrade Jesus
bolshevik butcher
9th August 2005, 11:02
Hey, hope to see you around. Do you feel abused by the church?
black
9th August 2005, 18:03
Are you a libertarian or authoritarian communist, Jesus?
Scottish_Militant
9th August 2005, 18:03
Hello Jesus,
That was a bummer about the whole getting nailed on a cross thing eh. What you upto nowadays?
STI
9th August 2005, 18:23
Is this guy serious? Jesus definately didn't care much for anything close to communism. He didn't even criticize slavery!
In fact, he went one step further with his anti-worker crap. In Luke 12:47, Jesus clearly states, "And that servant, which knew his lord's will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes."
black
9th August 2005, 18:38
and yet it also says in the Bible;
"He who confers benefits will be amply enriched, and he who refreshes others will himself be refreshed. Him who monopolizes grain, the people curse- but blessings upon the head of him who distributes it! "
Proverbs 11:25-6
"Open your mouth in behalf of the dumb, and for the rights of the destitute; Open your mouth, decree what is just, defend the needy and the poor!" Proverbs 31:8-9
"He who oppresses the poor to enrich himself will yield up his gains to the rich as sheer loss." Proverbs 22:16
And in the Gospels;
"I repeat what I said: it is easier for a camel to pass through a needle's eye than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God." Matthew 19:24
Jesus called them together and said to them: "You know how among the Gentiles those who seem to exercise authority lord it over them; their great ones make their importance felt. It cannot be like that with you. Anyone among you who aspires to greatness must serve the rest; whoever wants to rank first among you must serve the needs of all." Mark 10:42-4
Somewhat contradictory, I s'pose it'd matter if I was Christian.
Warren Peace
9th August 2005, 18:54
I'm not very religious at all, but Jesus was an okay dude. I respect all religions as long as they aren't racist or hateful. I have no respect for far-right "Christian" fascists, or genocidal "Jewish" Zionists.
"All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need." Acts 2:44-45
Oh yes, and my personal favorite:
"And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God." Matthew 19:24
Are you a libertarian or authoritarian communist, Jesus?
He means "are you an Anarchist or a Marxist-Leninist?" Or are you in between the two, like me?
black
10th August 2005, 00:28
He means "are you an Anarchist or a Marxist-Leninist?" Or are you in between the two, like me?
No, I meant what I said. And sorry to mess up your political view but being "in between" an Anarchist and a Leninist doesn't really make a whole deal of sense.
:)
Warren Peace
10th August 2005, 04:48
No, I meant what I said.
Comrade Jesus here is probably new to socialism, so I thougt he might not understand "libertarian" and "authoritarian". Just trying to help.
What's the difference anyway? After all, anarchists are sometimes called "libertarian" socialists.
Marx supported state socialism to reach communism. Authority, democratic or not, is what makes a state a state. So how could you be a Marxist or any extention of Marxism and not be "authoritarian"?
Let's say you agree with most of what Marx has to say, but believe in screwing state socialism and going directly to communism through revolution. Even the most ultra-dogmatic Anarchists like the RAAN follow Marx in this way. If this is what you are, you aren't a Marxist, you're an Anarchist.
And sorry to mess up your political view but being "in between" an Anarchist and a Leninist doesn't really make a whole deal of sense.
Why ever not? I think going directly to communism through revolution is the way to go. However, if imperialism is still a major force in the world, democratic state socialism after the revolution is okay, as long as the state is moving clearly twords communism.
:)
Comrade Sean
10th August 2005, 06:41
"The only truth is Rastafari"-Bob Marley.
Palmares
10th August 2005, 08:30
I think all you guys miss the point:
God is a lesbian
Taiga
10th August 2005, 09:43
Originally posted by Comrade
[email protected] 9 2005, 02:33 AM
Hello my Comrades,
Just stopping by letting all you fine people know even Christ is communist. Throw everything away and join me for ever lasting happiness.
Hasta la victoria siempre.
~Comrade Jesus
If you really believe that, I guess, you will definitely enjoy the Religion subforum. :lol:
Monty Cantsin
10th August 2005, 10:37
Originally posted by
[email protected] 10 2005, 07:30 AM
I think all you guys miss the point:
God is a lesbian
I think you miss the point- Jesus is a necrophiliac if his not then Mary Magdalen is the necrophiliac.
That’s the big question, which one? Did Jesus pleasure himself after resurrection or he enlisted Mary Magdalen servicies?
Non-Sectarian Bastard!
10th August 2005, 11:44
Originally posted by Revolt Now!@Aug 9 2005, 06:54 PM
I'm not very religious at all, but Jesus was an okay dude. I respect all religions as long as they aren't racist or hateful. I have no respect for far-right "Christian" fascists, or genocidal "Jewish" Zionists.
But christianity is racist.
However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)
You see foreigners are worth less then Israelites.
danny android
10th August 2005, 19:02
Yes but that is out of the old testiment. Many things from the old testiment were made obsolete in the christian faith. Like that you can't eat anything that doesn't have a cloven hoof and chews it's own cud. So therefore that is more of a hebrew belief.
ÑóẊîöʼn
10th August 2005, 19:12
Originally posted by danny
[email protected] 10 2005, 06:02 PM
Yes but that is out of the old testiment. Many things from the old testiment were made obsolete in the christian faith. Like that you can't eat anything that doesn't have a cloven hoof and chews it's own cud. So therefore that is more of a hebrew belief.
And that's some sort of excuse? Jesus was a donkeyfucking reactionary by today's standards. He is not relevant to the communists of today.
danny android
10th August 2005, 20:55
Originally posted by NoXion+Aug 10 2005, 06:12 PM--> (NoXion @ Aug 10 2005, 06:12 PM)
danny
[email protected] 10 2005, 06:02 PM
Yes but that is out of the old testiment. Many things from the old testiment were made obsolete in the christian faith. Like that you can't eat anything that doesn't have a cloven hoof and chews it's own cud. So therefore that is more of a hebrew belief.
And that's some sort of excuse? Jesus was a donkeyfucking reactionary by today's standards. He is not relevant to the communists of today. [/b]
I'm fairly sure the christian religion is against beastiality (a hint of sarcasm). And please explain what is so reactionary about jesus. He went against what the state was saying at his time, that is why they killed him.
Xvall
10th August 2005, 22:29
Jesus isn't relevant to anything - he wasn't real.
Red Robe Majere
11th August 2005, 01:21
Dont forget Acts 4:32 to 37
32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common. 33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all. 34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, 35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. 36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, 37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet.
Monty Cantsin
11th August 2005, 02:16
Jokes aside I have respect for Jesus even if the story we have now is more myth then man that is if there was a man to begin with but even within the myth I find many things admirable.
My other mythical hero is Prometheus…
Qwerty Dvorak
11th August 2005, 16:54
yeah, i think that jesus was a pretty cool guy. im not religious at all, in fact im an agnostic, and i dont think he was divine or anything, but all that love and peace stuff sounds pretty cool, i think youll agree.
enigma2517
14th August 2005, 19:27
Tsk tsk.
Jesus was certainetly not a communist.
Philanthropy might be the closest thing.
All religion is reactionary at heart. 60 some odd centuries of history prove that. I see little reason why that would (or could) ever change.
Most likely you are drawn to Jesus for the way he is portrayed and all of th e wonderful things he is credited with doing. I'm sure he was a very likable guy, no doubt.
But all that other crap is exactly that, superstitious bullshit. For the common man it is yet another form of enslavement. As a communist how can you possibly expect to get rid of you real masters if you still answer to a mythical one in the sky?
The two are at odds my friend. Ultimately, you will have to choose, and knowing how emotional humans are you'd probably go for the religion option. I'd seriously advise you to start questioning your "beliefs" or otherwise their irrationality will be detremental to yourself and your movement later on.
El-Bortukali
15th August 2005, 16:07
Don-t believe in the bible, it is a purely contradictory book writen by far too many people and adapted and re/writen by far too many people to be an accurate book.
Yet yea, jesus was a cool dude! :cool:
which doctor
15th August 2005, 19:01
I believe the story of Jesus is veru misunderstood. I believe he wanted to help all people. But the fundamentalists twisted his story all around.
Nothing Human Is Alien
15th August 2005, 20:18
As had been said, Jesus was a reactionary country preacher. Nothing more. His cult just "caught on".
BitchBrew
16th August 2005, 16:59
Are you "jesus was a communist preachers" claiming that the Christien religon as a whole is communistic?
El-Bortukali
17th August 2005, 13:22
i honestly think that Jesus is what you make of him...
I mean, he is mostly a myth, a legend, one can just ignore him, his example and don-t give a rats ass about it, yet i do think that his teachings can be very revolutionary...
Correct me if i am wrong, but wasn-t Jesus son of God but yet wasn-t he poor? Didn-t he claimed that all men were brothers and equal? I dunno if Jesus the person was really like that, yet it is rather nice to think that a long time ago there existed someone that did not only die for us but showed us that there is hope for a better future.
From my prespective, Jesus could be anything, but for me he was an example, a revolutionary and an activist who teached us that life was worth living, and that we are all brothers and sisters and thus there is no place for hatred, violence, exploitation or exclusion in the world...
Red Robe Majere
19th August 2005, 02:16
Jesus loved everyone..... except thoes danm commies <_<
Comrade Jesus has only made 1 post. Come on jesus post more
TheReadMenace
19th August 2005, 09:46
Originally posted by
[email protected] 9 2005, 05:41 PM
Is this guy serious? Jesus definately didn't care much for anything close to communism. He didn't even criticize slavery!
In fact, he went one step further with his anti-worker crap. In Luke 12:47, Jesus clearly states, "And that servant, which knew his lord's will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes."
Uh oh...
Let's not forget that Mark was the first gospel written, and was oral, at that. So the other books are run-offs of Mark, and a lot of 'quotes' used by Jesus are intrapolated by the later authors.
Check it out: there's a book by a guy named John Dominic Crossan called The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant and it's a damn good read. Also, check out the Marginal Jew series by John Meier - it's three volumes of textbook-length stuff, and it's amazing.
With that said, I do believe that the historical Jesus was more concerned with the poor than he was with anything else, except that he considered theology and politics one in the same. The Kingdom of God was meant to be an earthly society founded on the justice of God - that is, a society based on humane economic principles, equality, and social justice.
I don't know about this Comrade Jesus guy, but I think that Jesus is to be separated from the cult that used his name. The historical Jesus is not the Christ, and he is a bit different from the Jesus in the Bible (read anything by Josephus, or some of the gnostic and coptic texts).
Andrew
Forward Union
19th August 2005, 10:22
Originally posted by
[email protected] 9 2005, 05:21 PM
Are you a libertarian or authoritarian communist, Jesus?
I didn't think I'd ever hear that on this forum.....
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.