Scary stuff

[Laughing Man]

http://members.shaw.ca/freedomseven/pentagonlies.swf

If this is true it makes me both happy that there is evidence, and angry at the treason agaisnt America. You decide, though it might be a hoax. Some people have told me they saw the tail being removed.

[Publius]

Since I don't feel like writing, I'll just copy my responses from another forum to this flash.

They're not in context, obvsiously, so if you're truly interested, read the thread.

I'm leaving out my one line responses for obvious reasons.

http://beastieboys.com/bbs/showthread.php?...hlight=pentagon (http://beastieboys.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=30144&highlight=pentagon)

I'm EN[i]GMA.



But couldn't you find people who say what they say hit the Pentagon was definitly, without a doubt, a 757? Of course. No offense, but Joe Blow off the street doesn't know enough about how a plane or a missile sounds to know the difference.

I respect the fact that their asking questions but as Bob has pointed at, this is all somewhat illogical. There is no wreckage showing this was a smaller plane however, so it's fallacious to assume it is with a total lack of physical evidence from the projectile. You can't so because there is no wreckage it was a smaller plane when there is little wreckage of that plane either. Perhaps I'm leaving something out but it doesn't seem to hold up to me.


Apparently the wings collapsed inward towards the fuselage as it hit.

It's very easy to question what did happen, but without any evidence of what did, actually happen it's all forfeit. If it was a missle that hit, it would not have penetrated through 6 layers. It would have exploded at the front wall and caused no damage to the inner layers or dove throught first layers and exploded towards the middle. There is no way it was a missile. It had to be a plane of some kind. Small cessena doing this? Not likely. A small plane flew into an office building up in Florida a few weeks after 9/11 doing nothing to the building. The only thing capable of this damage is a plane. The huge hole, the force carrying through the walls, the radar evidence, the fire. It was a plane. Questioning is good. Unrelentingly beating a dead horse is not.



My mind is open. Open to logical conclussions. It makes perfect sense that it was plane. An armor piercing missile would not have exploded on contact, it would have travelled through and than exploded, in the center rings. If it was a small Cessna type plane it would not have travelled through at all. No missile is the size of that hole either. Nothing anyone has proposed could have caused THAT damage except for a jetliner such as Flight 77.

The initial hole was far greater than 14 feet. I assume your talking about the inner hole. The fuselage was not intact at the point it hit the innermost wall. It was a mangled collection of debris that happend to have those specifications.


The flash is so obviously bollocks. THe moronic plebes state that it was a missile, a small plane AND a series of bombs.

Which was it?

Actually, let's play a little game.

I don't feel like rewatching and rebutting every point, so you make a claim, and I'll piss on it and embarrass you.

Sound fun?

[Publius]

But I must note: Big ups on the Dust Brothers soundtrack.

Personally? I would have used Massive Attack (For the name), but good choice none-the-less.

[Publius]

Read this: http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

[Clarksist]

What utter bullshit!

One of the people quoted (Lon Rains), said that it sounded like a missile and not a plane. Now, because of this I'm going to have to quote a funny man. He's that prick Maddox:


My personal favorite warblog was one that had a flash animation with people who were quoted as saying "it didn't sound like a plane to me... it sounded like a missile." Thank you Joe Nobody for giving me your expert opinion on what missile sounds like, because gas station superintendents are usually the best people to ask about the sonic signature of ballistic missile thrust.


:lol:

[Laughing Man]

The music kicked. It was probably just a hoax. The only thing I'm still confused about is that tiny white thing supposed to be a big plane. Maybe a commuter jet?

[Publius]

The music kicked. It was probably just a hoax. The only thing I'm still confused about is that tiny white thing supposed to be a big plane. Maybe a commuter jet?

Or a bad picture.

Or a blurry picture of plane, unrelated to the crash.

These people are smameless. They're not above using pictures and quotes from seperate times and places if it helps to make their point.

[Laughing Man]

Thats definetly true.

[Clarksist]

Originally posted by [email protected] 24 2005, 08:15 PM

The music kicked. It was probably just a hoax. The only thing I'm still confused about is that tiny white thing supposed to be a big plane. Maybe a commuter jet?

Or a bad picture.

Or a blurry picture of plane, unrelated to the crash.

These people are smameless. They're not above using pictures and quotes from seperate times and places if it helps to make their point.
Which begs the question:

Can we trust anything on the internet?

[Andy Bowden]

Wonder why they haven't released the footage of the impact from the Hotel and the Gas station near the pentagon yet though. I always wondered why they were so many videos of the NY attacks, but none of the Pentagon attacks :unsure: ...

[Publius]

Wonder why they haven't released the footage of the impact from the Hotel and the Gas station near the pentagon yet though. I always wondered why they were so many videos of the NY attacks, but none of the Pentagon attacks :unsure: ...

I think they have.

I've seen video of a plane hitting the pentagon.

[Publius]

Here: http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/03/07/gen.pentagon.pictures/