Log in

View Full Version : Ah, the imperialist fuckers have won again



The Sloth
7th July 2005, 18:08
Hmmm, it's more and more obvious that Britain and America don't care much about their citizens. (I am, of course, joking -- they never did care. Ha. Ha.)

Those two imperialist fuckers won't ever solve terrorism, and they know it.

And, we had another attack today. I guess the imperialists got what they wanted!

The "war" is going well, it seems. You can't check every subway and every bus for explosives. I live in New York, and have subways everywhere around me; I don't want to die because some idiots had the 'grand' idea of invading Iraq and giving armed and economic support to Israeli terrorists.

But there's a solution. Let's see if it works.



American and European imperialism + Muslim nutcases = terrorism.

That is, AE + MN = T,

Where T is the sum of parts AE and MN working in diametric opposition to P:

P = PEACE; AE, by itself, equals W (War) and MN, by itself, equals B (Backwardness)

W + B = terrorism; however, if AE does not equal to P, then what is P equal to?

By examining the relevant data (e.g., Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism), we can conclude that AE has an abject opposite: S

S = Socialism, which is counter to AE (American and European imperialism)

Regardless of this new variable, the variable MN still remains; what is to be done?

MN -- counter to both AE, P, and S, yet includes B (Backwardness) in its natural set.

Since we have established that B is an integral element of MN, what makes up B itself?

B, an extraordinarily important value, has two hidden variables: Ignorance (I) and Economic Instability (IE)

We can thus say that I + IE = MN

What if the two new-found variables were to be erased? Unfortunately, that cannot be done. Instead, we can create a transformation of variables -- I and IE can be easily transformed into their diametric opposites: Education (ED) and Opportunity (O)

Thus, ED and O would NOT equal MN; in fact, MN, at this point, might equal S, which is Socialism!

Thus, if ED + O = S, let's go back to the original equation:

MN is no longer a value; instead, S is the new variable to be plugged in.

Thus, we have AE (American and European imperialism), S (Socialism), and whatever sum we come up with.

OK, hold on, let me put this shit into my calculator.

OK.

Notice that we have previously established AE has an absolute opposite: S.

Thus, AE + S = 0 (Zero)

0 is an interesting value to get because, ultimately, in real-world application, although the two would cancel out, the two would not cancel out without a struggle.

Thus, the immediate events before 0 would be either W (War) or B (Backwardness), but will, eventually, transform into the constant P (Peace)

Thus, as you can see, there is no paradox. Instead, we have a definite formula of how to go about solving the problems of Muslim nutcases and terrorism, as well as cancelling out American and European imperialism.

Thank you, caged kiddies.

Don't Change Your Name
7th July 2005, 18:30
?

JudeObscure84
7th July 2005, 18:59
black mecca, for shame. and anyways I figured that these Islamic jihadists were the new Maoist guerillas in your eyes.

Clarksist
7th July 2005, 19:23
Thus, the immediate events before 0 would be either W (War) or B (Backwardness), but will, eventually, transform into the constant P (Peace)

Thus, as you can see, there is no paradox. Instead, we have a definite formula of how to go about solving the problems of Muslim nutcases and terrorism, as well as cancelling out American and European imperialism.

Thank you, caged kiddies.


Wait why does 0=P? 0 could mean any amount of things as no numeric value is determined for the variables.

In anthropological mathematics 0 could mean absolutely anything.

While I enjoyed the post, it doesn't really prove anything. I would go the Sesame Street direction for the OI.

The Sloth
7th July 2005, 23:28
Originally posted by [email protected] 7 2005, 06:23 PM






Wait why does 0=P? 0 could mean any amount of things as no numeric value is determined for the variables.

The post was supposed to be humorous. I know much of it doesn't make sense.


While I enjoyed the post, it doesn't really prove anything. I would go the Sesame Street direction for the OI.

lmao

Excellent point.


black mecca, for shame. and anyways I figured that these Islamic jihadists were the new Maoist guerillas in your eyes.

I am not black, nor Muslim, nor Maoist.

LSD
8th July 2005, 03:02
black mecca

:huh:

That was an interesting slip...

JudeObscure84
8th July 2005, 18:03
That was an interesting slip...

indeed. :huh: my bad. but the thing about the maoism never meant to impose that you are maoist but have sympathies towards those that struggle for 'justice' through violence.

The Sloth
9th July 2005, 16:33
Originally posted by [email protected] 8 2005, 05:03 PM
[you] have sympathies towards those that struggle for 'justice' through violence.
yes.

of course, the violence only comes when all other options are exhausted.

to think that most of us desire violence for the sake of it is a bit much.