Log in

View Full Version : Adam and Eve.



Andy Bowden
25th June 2005, 18:16
How is it that Christian fundamentalists can attack homosexuals for "disgusting sexual practices", when according to their theories Adam's son must have been shagging his mum on an almost daily basis?

:blink:

ÑóẊîöʼn
25th June 2005, 20:33
You didn't seriously believe that fundamentalist beliefs should make sense?

monkeydust
26th June 2005, 23:11
It's Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

LSD
27th June 2005, 01:29
Actually, most Christian fundamentallists claim that since Adam and Eve had some daughters as well ...Seth and Cain were actually banging their sisters and not their mother.

Xvall
27th June 2005, 02:02
That is so much better.

LSD
27th June 2005, 02:18
Oh, didn't you know? Incest isn't wrong if God approves it.

So, when Christians commit incest, it's all cool. :cool:

Which kind of explains the "Bible Belt"... :P

Xvall
27th June 2005, 02:43
Lol.

Publius
27th June 2005, 03:25
It's Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

I was actually tempted to make this very post.

Andy Bowden
29th June 2005, 17:59
"Ever noticed how people who believe in creationism look really unevolved?"

:lol:

codyvo
1st July 2005, 04:54
Originally posted by Lysergic Acid [email protected] 27 2005, 12:29 AM
Actually, most Christian fundamentallists claim that since Adam and Eve had some daughters as well ...Seth and Cain were actually banging their sisters and not their mother.
I think it was Cain and Abel but either way they had to fuck their sisters, amd I would also like to know, if Adam and Eve were white like most right-wing christian nuts think they were then how are their dark skinned people? Tells you that they must if been an interracial couple, so their goes the nazis "purity of race" argument.

crappitydoodah
1st July 2005, 05:03
yet does any story make sense.....

most stories of Jewish tradition are just that, stories...for that's how they taugh one another...through these stories...

This was first a book of the Jews...so the Jews interpretation might be more accurate...like no original sin...like I'm not born paying for the sins of adam and eve...I'm my own person with my responsiblity to myself...

most all christians...for mob rule can never be based off of truth....have screwed it up...and will...for no majority can hold truth...it twists and turns....as Jesus himself claimed true.... Nietzche and Emma Goldman have referred to him as a sort of anarchist!!!

LSD
1st July 2005, 06:40
I think it was Cain and Abel

No, Cain killed Abel and then ran away to Nod. He then "found a wife" (!), had a kid and "founded a great city" (with three people?).

Adam and Eve had another son name Seth and he had lot's and lot's of babies (presumably with his sister(s)).


if Adam and Eve were white like most right-wing christian nuts think they were then how are their dark skinned people?

According to most white supremecists, dark skinned races are the result of the mating of either the snake (satan) and Eve or the snake and "Lilith" or Lilith and Demons or just Demons.

Sometimes, they have whole whacky theories about animals and mud and Satan mixing mud with people, but usually it's one of the above.


yet does any story make sense.....

Sure.

Ever read President Nixon by Richard Reeves? Seems to make a lot of sense to me!

Maybe you meant to say that no crazy made-up nonsense story makes sense, in which case, of course, you're absolutely correct.


...for no majority can hold truth...

Why the hell not?

Most people today believe that the earth is round ...so a "majority holds truth"!

cormacobear
1st July 2005, 07:51
Originally posted by Lysergic Acid [email protected] 30 2005, 11:40 PM

I think it was Cain and Abel

No, Cain killed Abel and then ran away to Nod. He then "found a wife" (!), had a kid and "founded a great city" (with three people?).

Adam and Eve had another son name Seth and he had lot's and lot's of babies (presumably with his sister(s)).


if Adam and Eve were white like most right-wing christian nuts think they were then how are their dark skinned people?

According to most white supremecists, dark skinned races are the result of the mating of either the snake (satan) and Eve or the snake and "Lilith" or Lilith and Demons or just Demons.
Wow someone who actually knows what it is they hate, I'm impressed. And aprove verily, if your going to dissaprove of something you should at least know what it is you dissaprove of.

And Lillith I'm very impressed. The Hebrew Kabalahs you're remarkebly well read in theology.


And as for the unevolved comment, well that's biggotry, so it sounds to me like you may have a little evolving left to do yourself.

Postteen
1st July 2005, 15:14
Well, I think that Adam and Eve had 2 sons, so how could they have grandchildren?Did the brothers have sex with their mother?Well, all those orgies seem that happened in the Holy Bible, an ethical (jewish) book for the moral christians.

LSD
2nd July 2005, 00:34
Well, I think that Adam and Eve had 2 sons

Actually, the bible says that Adam had "sons and daughters" after Seth (the third son), it doesn't specify how many.


so how could they have grandchildren?Did the brothers have sex with their mother?

Please read over this thread, both of your questions are answered.

Oldergod
2nd July 2005, 00:45
religion can kiss my ass

crappitydoodah
3rd July 2005, 02:20
yet the same majority that holds claim that the earth is round once held that it was flat...

Have you ever read Kierkagarrd....

my point is that in mob rule you have no idiividual responsiblity....you simply accept as part of this majority what is accepted as part of majority...part of the definition of the individual is when they brake from the majority and form something else, something different....something unique to them selves...

as if there is a God then if the majority said it was true then they would hold truth...but only as deep as a majority may claim...cause belief and a life lived is simply individual....it's like now that the majority say that slavery is wrong...is this conviction, or simply cause this is the accepted phrase of the day??? despite rather it is wrong or not....and like I said the same majority claimed it to be true that slavery was ok not so long ago...