Log in

View Full Version : The Case For Regime Change



Libertarius
15th October 2002, 22:04
The Case for Regime Change

NEW YORK--Making the case for United Nations intervention against the United States, Iranian President Mohammad Khatami told the organization yesterday that military action will be "unavoidable" unless the U.S. agrees to destroy its weapons of mass destruction.

In a much-anticipated speech to a special session of the U.N. General Assembly held in Brussels, Khatami launched a blistering attack against American leader George W. Bush, accusing him of defying U.N. resolutions and using his country's wealth to line the pockets of wealthy cronies at a time when the people of his country make do without such basic social programs as national health insurance.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nearly two years ago, the civilized world watched as this evil and corrupt dictator subverted the world's oldest representative democracy in an illegal coup d'état," said Khatami. "Since then the Bush regime has continued America's systematic repression of ethnic and religious minorities and threatened international peace and security throughout the world. Thousands of political opponents and ordinary citizens have been subjected to arbitrary arrest and imprisonment. Basic civil rights have been violated. This rogue state has flouted the international community on legal, economic and environmental issues. It has even ignored the Geneva Conventions on the treatment of prisoners of war by denying that its illegal invasion of Afghanistan--which has had a destabilizing influence throughout Central Asia--was a war at all."

Khatami said the U.S. possesses the world's largest arsenal of nuclear weapons, weapons "that, when first developed, were used immediately to kill half a million innocent civilians just months after acquiring them. No nation that has committed nuclear genocide can be entrusted with weapons of mass destruction."

"Bush has invaded Afghanistan and is now threatening Iraq. We cannot stand by and do nothing while danger gathers. We can't for this tyrant to strike first. We have an obligation to act pre-emptively to protect the world from this evildoer," Khatami said.

As delegates punctuated his words with bursts of applause, Khatami noted that U.S. intelligence agencies had helped establish and fund the world's most virulent terrorist organizations, including Al Qaeda, and the Taliban regime that harbored them. "The U.S. created the Islamist extremists who attacked its people on September 11, 2001," he stated, "and Bush's illegitimate junta cynically exploited those attacks to repress political dissidents, make sweetheart deals with politically-connected corporations and revive 19th century-style colonial imperialism."

Khatami asked the U.N. to set a deadline for Bush to step down in favor of president-in-exile Al Gore, the legitimate winner of the 2000 election, the results of which were subverted through widespread voting irregularities and intimidation. "We favor not regime change, but rather restoration and liberation," he said. In addition, Khatami said, the U.S. must dismantle its weapons of mass destruction, guarantee basic human rights to all citizens and agree to abide by international law or "face the consequences."

Most observers agree that those "consequences" would likely include a prolonged bombing campaign targeting major U.S. cities and military installations, followed by a ground invasion led by European forces. "Civilian casualties would likely be substantial," said a French military analyst. "But the American people must be liberated from tyranny."

Khatami's charges, which were detailed in a dossier prepared by French President Jacques Chirac, were dismissed by a representative of the American strongman as "lies, half-truths and misguided beliefs, motivated by the desire to control a country with oil, natural gas and other natural resources." National Security Minister Condoleezza Rice denied that the U.S. maintains weapons of mass destruction and invited U.N. inspectors to visit Washington to "see for themselves that our weapons are designed only to keep the peace, subject of course to full respect for American sovereignty."

The U.N. is expected to reject any conditions for or restrictions on arms inspections.

Experts believe that the liberation of the United States will require a large ground force of European and other international troops, followed by a massive rebuilding program costing billions of euros. "Even before Bush, the American political system was a shambles," said Prof. Salvatore Deluna of the University of Madrid. "Their single-party plutocracy will have to be reshaped into true parliamentary-style democracy. Moreover, the economy will have to be retooled from its current military dictatorship model--in which a third of the federal budget goes to arms, and taxes are paid almost exclusively by the working class--to one in which basic human needs such as education and poverty are addressed. Their infrastructure is a mess; they don't even have a national passenger train system. Fixing a failed state of this size will require many years."

* * * * * * * * * * * * -By Ted Rall

Conghaileach
15th October 2002, 22:29
This article scared me as I read it. I was convinced that it was a parody, but it seemed to take itself so seriously (and actually provided a great statement that could have actually been read at the UN.)

If only someone had the balls to actually do it.

timbaly
17th October 2002, 01:42
This article also startled me. It's a damn good argument and it does seem like a joke. however the UN seems, make that IS for the US to gain support for it's crimes not to stop the US from comitting crimes. I wish I could read it at the UN headquarters, because someone shoud.

Jaha
17th October 2002, 01:55
damn you, you would have made my day if it were real.

playing on my emotions like that!

some day it will be true....

(Edited by Jaha at 1:57 am on Oct. 17, 2002)

vodun
17th October 2002, 05:41
Good one. Funniest damn joke I've heard in a while. Khatami talking about elections and liberation. If you thought for a second that any of this shit was plausible, well, then you belong on "Che Lives".

Exploited Class
17th October 2002, 16:29
I have been a long time reader of Ted's comics and his editorials, ever since I found them on Yahoo; and I have to say that this is one of his better editorials.

I sent the link to it, to my cubemate, and at first he thought it was real then realized that it wasn't. After reading it however he turned to me and said, "That is a perspective on our actions that I never would have even thought to look at, and a lot of it makes sense." Hey when propaganda has you, it has you, and of course you aren't going to look at things in different views if you aren't taught to.

Of course this is the guy that I have explained to that, even though Hitler attempted to wipe out a race, we did wipe out a race. And he asks who? I don't tell him and then he goes, "Indians?". Gears they be turning.

Libertarius
18th October 2002, 01:13
Isn't it a nice idea though? I mean, the States ARE the only ones to ever commit nuclear genocide, and they should have military action taken against them before they attempt oil conquest in the Middle East (it's already starting). Bush has nothing to do with who leads a country across the world.

It's not so ridiculous when you think about it. A united force of disgruntled Europeans/Asians could easily overcome the US. The United States are run by the most tyrannical regime in the world, shrouded in lies and nationalistic pride. The Bush Administration needs to be removed, and military action OF COURSE will be necessary if that is ever to happen.

Jaha
18th October 2002, 03:29
i notice one major problem though.

what the hell would modivate europeans and asians to liberate the united states? they have their own national interests and i cant see which one would cause them to invade the US....

we have jack. what possibly would they gain?

Libertarius
18th October 2002, 04:22
That is why it is merely a nice idea, Jaha. It would be a great thing indeed if those nations opposed to war on Iraq did something about the war mongers running the United States. I now await the fateful action made by the Bush Administration which gives other countries a strong reason to disagree and react against them.

I think an international anti-war coalition put together by ordinairy people with similar ideals would go a long way to get the word out. Any attempts by US powers to stifle this organization would be looked down upon my everyone as a violation of the policy of Freedom of Speech (ahem, Bill Maher).

Although this would be an effective way to persuade people to the cause of stopping US oppression of its own people, and foreign countries, I DO think that a non-terrorist militia might be necessary to manipulate things a little more forcefully.