my preditions on the future

[fokker-scourge]

i belive that the world will be engufed by it's own humen creadtions

citys will be destroyed, governments will fall it will be hot cuz of the nuclear radiation

simular too pre US attacked Afganistan





seems like chaos
no government no order


but then a red arm of salvation rescues the the world


the arm of socialism and communism and we be united


i think this or something simular will happen

what yall thing

[Clarksist]

If nuclear war happens, then it will be frigidly cold. (ever heard of nuclear winter)

But no, I don't think that communism will be the savior of post-nuclear apacolypse. Because if the world goes to nuclear war, that's it... NO MORE WORLD.

[anomaly]

Originally posted by [email protected] 15 2005, 03:19 AM
If nuclear war happens, then it will be frigidly cold. (ever heard of nuclear winter)

But no, I don't think that communism will be the savior of post-nuclear apacolypse. Because if the world goes to nuclear war, that's it... NO MORE WORLD.
I agree completely, Clarksist. That is why I propose that we begin revolution in an area that has no nuclear weapons, so that threat can be immediately eliminated.

[Bannockburn]

The near future will be easy to predict. Simply follow the agenda of “the project for a new American century”. WMD’s will further be a justification for pre-ventive war against small time state with no real threat. Iran, Syria and North Korea all ring a bell.

Ideally the US would want to be the dominant nuclear state with client states like Israel that will be able to control unstable regions.

[slim]

I predict control of the people. Inflation of the troubles in the middle east leading to new powers for the state at home.

[rikaguilera]

I see the current path of the U.S. as one of an Orwellian theroy. Loss of personal freedoms, loss of privacy, propaganda being the only reading material, and govt. control over every step in a pesons life. I don't see a war consisting of large weapons, due to it destroying the money making resources that the govt. wants in the first place. I do see a revolt starting in the Central and middle (Mexico) Americas, and I for one will be happy to join if for that cause.

[slim]

I see a non expectant revolution in England... :ph34r:

[Non-Sectarian Bastard!]

I predict apocolypse. . . in ten minutes.

[slim]

OMG!!! Get off the streets!!!

[Clarksist]

Originally posted by [email protected] 16 2005, 12:02 AM
The near future will be easy to predict. Simply follow the agenda of “the project for a new American century”. WMD’s will further be a justification for pre-ventive war against small time state with no real threat. Iran, Syria and North Korea all ring a bell.

Ideally the US would want to be the dominant nuclear state with client states like Israel that will be able to control unstable regions.
I don't think that the US would be able to handle another Iraqi war. At least not for another decade or so. And by then so many people in other parts of the world will have become so similar to the US (due majorly to globalization) that there will be no place to attack due to interconnected economy.

[Noah]

Hey guys,

I think the next war is going to be on non renewable resources, America being the cause of it, like most other wars. Im not sure, it could possibly lead onto a Nuclear war, I couldnt see a revolution in Britain yet, not at all. Most people have good standards of living here...well where I'm living they are.

Mosh.

[RedAnarchist]

In Britain we are too set in our ways. The Royal Family are too often seen as something important to the country, there is still a disturbing streak of discrmination throughout many facets of society and many of our services and companies are still privitized, meaning that they are run for profit.

I dont see a British Revolution happening for at least 200 years, and certainly not in our lifetimes. We, however, will almost certainly see revolutionary action, mainly in Latin America, Central Asia and perhaps parts of Africa.

[Forward Union]

Originally posted by fokker-[email protected] 15 2005, 12:32 AM
what yall thing

I think you have a wonderful, wonderful imagination. Focus on the techniques and you could write some good books.

[fernando]

The Azteks claimed the world would end in 2012 if I recall correctly.

About nuclear war, Einstein had something interesting to say on that:
"world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones"

[Bannockburn]

I don't think that the US would be able to handle another Iraqi war. At least not for another decade or so. And by then so many people in other parts of the world will have become so similar to the US (due majorly to globalization) that there will be no place to attack due to interconnected economy.

I think you reiterate my point, but through another mode of intervention. The ever expanding need of capital and widening markets will obviously expand further globalization. This will be through US based transnational corporations aligned by further treaties. This will be seen not only through bloody wars, but through forums like the WTO, IMF, UN and World Bank. For example, CAFTA is a significant expansion of US “free market” policies that will further steal Central American resources. To illustrate this point, such neo-cons and member of the Project for the New American century Paul Wolfowitz is head of the World Bank, John Bolton is nominee for the UN, Rumsfield, etc are all members, and there is no reason not to think they will not push policy on these organization for American interests.

Moreover, while I agree with you that Iraq has taken its toll for the people of the United States, the Bush administration has significantly shown that the people are marginalized, and have very little effect on US policy. Thus, even if the people whole heartily want to avoid war; recent history has shown that they can be scared into supporting a war, or even disregarded. A real crime for democracy. If you do a little research and some reading you can see that Bush’s National Security Strategy mirrors closely the Project for the New American Century’s principles of American Defense; including having multiple theatre wars, a nuclear monopoly or at least a nuclear oligopoly through client and friendly states, a complete monopoly of the militarization of space, and an aggressive policy to further American economic and military interest of the far East, and the Middle East. For example, opening and building a framework of permanent bases in the Middle East. If you watch the news, I’m sure you already know about closing American bases. However, what they didn’t tell you is that they will reopen them on foreign soil. Four bases are going to be in Iraq, and I know a few are in Afghanistan. Thus, if military intervention can not be a justification, then aggressive action diplomatically will be implemented.

Moreover, it wouldn’t surprise me if The Iraq war is going according to plan. There have been several reports, including in the Toronto Star, the London Times, etc that Iraq is close to the brink of civil war. I think CNN may have even picked up on it for a minute segment. Thus, it would not surprise me if the exist strategy was a civil war and the US will arm and support Sunni, Kurds or Shiite in their newly established domains of three sovereign states, Kurdistan for example. If history has anything to say, divide and concur has always been a favorite, or simply dividing lines between feuding states like North and South Korea.