Log in

View Full Version : Who would lead Iraq?



vox
22nd September 2002, 21:12
Since the Bush administration seems intent on "regime change" in Iraq, one obvious question, not addressed in the corporate US media, is who will be installed in Iraq to lead this new regime?

The Sunday Herald (Scotland) looked into this and came up with a few names (http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0922-02.htm), including General Nizar Al-Khazraji, who "(a)ccording to many human rights groups, he is the field commander who led the 48-hour chemical weapons attack which poisoned and burned 5000 Kurdish civilians in the northern town of Halabja in March 1988. He also, alleges one credible eyewitness who testified in video-taped evidence earlier this year, kicked a little Kurdish child to death after his forces entered a village during the height of the Iraqi repression in 1988.

"But, says Ambassador David Mack, a senior official in the US State Department who co-ordinates meetings of Iraqi opposition groups in Washington DC, General Nizar al-Khazraji has 'a good military reputation' and 'the right ingredients' as a future leader in Iraq."

Also mentioned is Brigadier-General Najib Al-Salihi, who "played a significant military role in Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. He was also engaged in putting down the uprising against Saddam 's rule that followed the defeat at the hands of the US-led forces. The repressive way in which this particular episode was handled caused 1.5 million people to flee their homes, while Salihi went on to write a book about his crushing of the popular uprising, entitled Al-Zilzal, 'The Earthquake'."

Anyone interested should definitely take the time to read this article, and force the issue into any debate about the wisdom of a US attack on Iraq.

vox

peaccenicked
22nd September 2002, 21:25
It certainly raises concerns that the mainstream media moguls dont like.
Here is a link to an article (http://www.theatlantic.com/cgi-bin/send.cgi?page=http%3A//www.theatlantic.com/issues/2002/11/fallows.htm) that raises further post war concerns.

(Edited by peaccenicked at 9:26 pm on Sep. 22, 2002)


(Edited by peaccenicked at 9:26 pm on Sep. 22, 2002)

hawarameen
22nd September 2002, 21:49
havnt read the articles yet but the two choices on offer do not fill me with any hope.

i have said from the outset that any regime change instigated by anyone but the people of iraq (including kurds) will result in more of the same.

more of the same brutality and lack of respect for human life.

the allies will as usual jump in with both feet, mix it up a bit and jump straight out again leaving the kurdish minority with yet further generations of oppression under the dictatorship of a saddam mould.

today the kurds of iraq live in relative freedom, if theese are the alternatives i would rather stick with the bastard we know rather than the one we dont.

peaccenicked
22nd September 2002, 22:26
I think the talk of ''regime change'' hides the oil question. Imperialist concerns for democracy in the middle east are a sick joke. This should be one of the strong messages coming from the anti-war movement.

(Edited by peaccenicked at 10:30 pm on Sep. 22, 2002)

John Difool
23rd September 2002, 00:01
Damn ... that's the second ( http://www.sundayherald.com/27572 )very interesting article the sunday herald comes out with on irak recently ...
I should consider checking that paper out more often :D

(Edited by John Difool at 12:02 am on Sep. 23, 2002)


(Edited by John Difool at 12:14 am on Sep. 23, 2002)

vox
23rd September 2002, 01:12
John DiFool,

You might also want to check out this article (http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0915-01.htm) which was originally published in the Sunday Herald. I, too, may have to start checking it out more often.

vox

Angie
23rd September 2002, 01:19
Afghanistan's Karzai was an oil company man, an obvious U.S puppet. They'll get an Iraqi version of him, no doubt.

peaccenicked
23rd September 2002, 03:43
I am suprised by the Sunday Herald. Sometimes we get a good spate of journalists then they get sacked. This time I hope they last longer.
Some of the counter information produced against the
Afghani genocide came out of Scottish media studies groups. http://www.urban75.com/Action/news144.html

vox
23rd September 2002, 04:52
For those of you who haven't read it, check out the link peacenicked left to the Atlantic in the second post in this thread. It's long, but it's good and conveys just what the US is setting itself up for with by attacking Iraq.

vox

peaccenicked
24th September 2002, 00:59
Here is Robert Fisk's (http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=334318) take on recent
events.




(Edited by peaccenicked at 1:03 am on Sep. 24, 2002)