Log in

View Full Version : hypocrisy and using Che's name...



Maaja
18th September 2002, 18:24
The man Kaur Kender who's doing this campain is a real idiot. His previous work's has been a book called 'Money' , it's just about making money and other similar books. In one interview he told that he's only using Che because he'll make him rich and that actually in his opinion Guevara was just a queer person...



As if in a deliberate cosmic insult to Karl Marx, communisms iconic color has been transmuted here into a symbol of electronic commerce. Were not talking just any kind of red. Not maroon or pinkish. The color Kaur Kender was looking for recently was the dirty, yellowish shade that flew over Baltic capitals on Soviet flags, adorned uniforms and the sashes of the Communist Youth League.
Kender, a novelist and advertising consultant, had to go to the history books to find bright red banners in an old photograph. He matched the shade on his computer, then slapped it behind a 15 meter by 15 meter image of Che Guevara on a billboard over Tallinns central Viru Square. FREEDOM! To buy and sell, the advertisement for online auction site Osta.ee declared.
Kender explains that he was looking for something that was a little bit of a taboo. His idea seems to have worked and the countrys first splashy New Economy ad campaign drew attention: Osta pulled in 2000 bids in its first month.
Kender and other pranksters such as Austrian venture capitalist Thomas Streimelweger, chairman of red-stars.com data AG, helped shatter such taboos as there were against communist symbols. Theyve prepared the ground for others to follow.
When the leading Baltic IT company Microlink recently rebranded itself as the Red Dot Company, it didnt even consider the symbolism of the recent past, company representatives say.
During the Soviet era, distinguished by deportations during Stalinist rule and later by suppression of free speech and religion, the red Soviet flag was a symbol of oppression.
Today, advertising executives in the Baltics say its a joke at best.
The previous association has simply been lost. The color, a fixture in Socialist realist artfrom the popularity of red marble for sculptures to the red bandanna around a workers head in countless paintingshas become thoroughly capitalist.
The first push from Communism to consumerism came with the entry of big American brands.
These days, red is all about Coca-Cola and the Marlboro Man, says Varis Lazo, managing director of Saatchi & Saatchis Latvian affiliate. Local companies in Eastern Europe have learned from those brands, and from the omnipresent McDonalds. Now everybody is going red, because red sells, he says.
Part of the swift semiotic change comes from a generation gap. Few Eastern Europeans old enough to remember the horrors of Stalinism do their shopping online. Not many retailers here spend much time targeting these older people, whose pocketbooks have taken the hardest hit from the transition to capitalism.
The target audience here is very young, says Guntis Stirna, managing director of Balta Communications in Riga, Latvia. One client, a candy company, recently told him, Were only interested in 15 to 30, because the others dont have any moneyand why should we advertise to them?
Definitive evidence of the red shift in the Baltics came when Microlink went red.
After a string of acquisitions in 2000, the Baltic conglomerate of hardware, software, and solutions companies needed to extend its brand to its new companies. Playing on the red dot in the microlink.com logo, Chief Executive Allan Martinson suggested it call itself the Red Dot Company, and incorporate the symbol into the logos of all members of the group.
When only one of 30 participants in a focus group even mentioned the communist connection, Microlink went ahead with the slogan, printing it on banners displayed at key locations in Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius, running cryptic advertisements and sending its big customers mousepads emblazoned with the crimson dot.
Microlinks Marketing Director Antti Aasma says the company was thinking more of dot-com style than of communism.
Its abstractit doesnt mean anything, so it means everything, he says.
Kaur Hanson of Tallinns Zoom agency, who worked on the campaign, agrees.
Red is such a basic color that the association with politics has very quickly worn off, he says. Of course, at some point there would be associations. A red hammer might not be such a good idea.
Kender, the man behind the Che Guevara campaign, knows something about that: He drew fire earlier in the decade when he named his agency Sacco and Vanzetti after the American Communists who became Soviet icons after an unfair trial in Boston.
But now Kender says even that joke has lost its punch, and he doubts that the dominant color of the red dot campaign will carry the same power it might have a few years ago.
Dot is a heavily loaded word, he says. Theres no room left for communism.


Benjamin Smith is a New York-based journalist who spent several years in the Baltic states in the late 1990s. He is a frequent contributor to CITY PAPER

Xvall
18th September 2002, 18:27
:(

Angie
23rd September 2002, 01:11
Slightly related, slightly not...

Not far from where I live there's a bus stop that showed a promotional ad for some Dutch beer, using an outline of Che's famous Korda profile, slightly altered so it looked like he was holding the drink.

I noticed that it lasted the most of a fortnight, if that.

Frankly, it insulted me to see it being used in such a fashion, and apparently insulted someone else enough that the company was forced to take back the advertising.

The most pathetic bit of all was the little message that had been at the bottom of the ad, that said something along the lines of: "This is not blatant misuse of Che Guevara's image."

Maaja
23rd September 2002, 05:45
With my story the most pathetic part is that the man Kaur Kender said 'better red than dead' and he explained that if you want to survive and make good money then you have to do anything.

Marxman
23rd September 2002, 13:31
Like I said. How easily cappies show their real genuine primitivism and act of slandering. They have nothing to be proud of, so they slander other pride as a counter-attack or an act of jealousy or mostly, just for money.

Money is their goal and their initiative. But they're actually totally unhappy and miserable, living in a total material world. They call us "Ants" but actually they are more like them or more like robotic machinery.

Practically, they place their enemies where they have done misdeeds, exactly like Stalinists. Abusement is just a mild form. I see what they're doing to the youth and to the nature or for that matter, to all forms of life.