Originally posted by
[email protected] 22 2005, 12:58 AM
Far from revolutionaries, the Yippies were frustrated liberals. Their rhetoric was an attempt to scare the ruling class into paying attention to them. The same is true of the Chicago '68 convention demonstrations...which were intended to be pro-Eugene McCarthy, and which was a resounding failure in terms of mobilizing the masses.
Depite the massive attention paid to it by the big-business media, those demonstrations were some of the smallest national actions in the history of the movement against the Vietnam War.
This is confused at best.
The Yippies were a very mixed bag -- they were not really an organized party or organization but a loose movement of politicized forces from the youth counterculture.
Quite a few of them were rather seriously trying to figure out how to defeat imperialism and build a radically different culture. And I have always respected Abbie Hoffman because he was, especially in the height of the sixties, on that tip.
Obviously there were major differences between the Yippies (who I knew intimately in many places) and more organized communist forces. They had a vision of building rebel communities that would defie and undermine the reactionary U.S> system and government -- and serve as base areas for both resistance and revolution. But they really had a rather vague (and ultimately) utopian sense of how all that would come about. But at the same time, they also worked hard to spread radical ideas and activism among the youth communities and campuses -- and often worked closely in support of the Black revolution (and the panthers who were under attack).
Abbie and others were full of hilarious practical jokes -- he was brilliant at guerilla theater. But you would have to be humorless (and completely miss the point) if you took his antics literally and try to claim it is all "an attempt to scare the ruling class into paying attention to them." :P
As for your remarks about the Chicago 68 demos -- everything you say is mistaken. Anyone who knows anything about them knows that the demos weren't "pro-McCarthy" at all -- though they did succeed in winning over significant numbers of McCarthites who had come to participate in the convention and were disgusted by what they saw. And obviously there is nothing wrong with WINNING PEOPLE OVER in that way from bourgeois politics, right?
And they weren't a "resounding failure in mobilizing the masses" in other ways as well. YOu can try, but you can't hide the simple fact that this was one of the most significant and pivotal events of the 1960s -- as virtually anyone who was alive then will tell you. The "big business media" tried to prevent these demos -- by putting out that they were going to be a massacre -- and people poured out anyway, with great courage and self-sacrifice. (Making it seem like the bourgeoisie built these demos UP is one of the funnier distortions I've heard in a while.)
Hope that helps give a little clarity to all this.