Log in

View Full Version : So What Are Your Reasons?



Paradox
2nd May 2005, 16:11
Hey cappies, I'm sure this has been asked before, but I just wanted to know what makes you stay? Why do you come here, I mean? Let me guess... for the entertainment! To laugh at our " impossible to impliment" ideology. That's probably the big reason, but is there anything else that keeps you coming back? Curiousity? To see different opinions on current issues? What are your reasons for sticking around?

t_wolves_fan
2nd May 2005, 16:47
Originally posted by [email protected] 2 2005, 03:11 PM
Hey cappies, I'm sure this has been asked before, but I just wanted to know what makes you stay? Why do you come here, I mean? Let me guess... for the entertainment! To laugh at our " impossible to impliment" ideology. That's probably the big reason, but is there anything else that keeps you coming back? Curiousity? To see different opinions on current issues? What are your reasons for sticking around?
All of the above.

Contrary to my many insults, there are occasionally many good arguments on this site and I appreciate them.

On the other hand, there are a lot of loons. They are entertaining to chat with.

Fortunately (for you) I am starting a new job in a couple of months that will keep me more busy, so I'll have less time to pester you.

;)

ahhh_money_is_comfort
6th May 2005, 06:23
Originally posted by [email protected] 2 2005, 03:11 PM
Hey cappies, I'm sure this has been asked before, but I just wanted to know what makes you stay? Why do you come here, I mean? Let me guess... for the entertainment! To laugh at our " impossible to impliment" ideology. That's probably the big reason, but is there anything else that keeps you coming back? Curiousity? To see different opinions on current issues? What are your reasons for sticking around?
I come here to reaffirm that communism won't work and that communism is a good way to make Adolf Hitlers. Yes yes yes, I know, tyrany and despotism is not communist; yet these products of communism don't call themselves 'Sir' or "Madame", they call themselves "Comrade".

bed_of_nails
6th May 2005, 06:31
Originally posted by ahhh_money_is_comfort+May 6 2005, 05:23 AM--> (ahhh_money_is_comfort @ May 6 2005, 05:23 AM)
[email protected] 2 2005, 03:11 PM
Hey cappies, I'm sure this has been asked before, but I just wanted to know what makes you stay? Why do you come here, I mean? Let me guess... for the entertainment! To laugh at our " impossible to impliment" ideology. That's probably the big reason, but is there anything else that keeps you coming back? Curiousity? To see different opinions on current issues? What are your reasons for sticking around?
I come here to reaffirm that communism won't work and that communism is a good way to make Adolf Hitlers. Yes yes yes, I know, tyrany and despotism is not communist; yet these products of communism don't call themselves 'Sir' or "Madame", they call themselves "Comrade". [/b]
So you advocate calling someone different things merely based on which genitals they currently have?

You believe that a group striving for equality is doomed to become tyranic? (Obviously you have never learned your American history then.)

You are convinced anyone who doesnt use english names for people is a bad person?

You, sir, are a fool.

ahhh_money_is_comfort
6th May 2005, 06:40
Originally posted by bed_of_nails+May 6 2005, 05:31 AM--> (bed_of_nails @ May 6 2005, 05:31 AM)
Originally posted by [email protected] 6 2005, 05:23 AM

[email protected] 2 2005, 03:11 PM
Hey cappies, I'm sure this has been asked before, but I just wanted to know what makes you stay? Why do you come here, I mean? Let me guess... for the entertainment! To laugh at our " impossible to impliment" ideology. That's probably the big reason, but is there anything else that keeps you coming back? Curiousity? To see different opinions on current issues? What are your reasons for sticking around?
I come here to reaffirm that communism won't work and that communism is a good way to make Adolf Hitlers. Yes yes yes, I know, tyrany and despotism is not communist; yet these products of communism don't call themselves 'Sir' or "Madame", they call themselves "Comrade".
So you advocate calling someone different things merely based on which genitals they currently have?

You believe that a group striving for equality is doomed to become tyranic? (Obviously you have never learned your American history then.)

You are convinced anyone who doesnt use english names for people is a bad person?

You, sir, are a fool. [/b]
Yes yes yes. I have heard the party line before. All the evil things communist dictators have done is not communism.

RedCeltic
6th May 2005, 09:10
I come here to reaffirm that communism won't work and that communism is a good way to make Adolf Hitlers.

Aldolf Hitler was strongly anti-communist. The NAZI party came to power by fanning the flames of anti-communism. This is pretty much common knowlege.

RedAnarchist
6th May 2005, 09:14
Originally posted by [email protected] 6 2005, 05:40 AM

Yes yes yes. I have heard the party line before. All the evil things communist dictators have done is not communism.
Can i ask you to do two things?

1. Read the Communist Manifesto, if that isnt too difficult.
2. Using your new found knowledge of Communism, study the actions of Stalin and Mao.

If you do these two simple things, i'm sure you will come to realize that Stalin is about as Communist as Dubya.

Elect Marx
6th May 2005, 09:21
Originally posted by [email protected] 5 2005, 11:40 PM
Yes yes yes. I have heard the party line before. All the evil things communist dictators have done is not communism.
:lol: Do you ever look at yourself and ask "what the fuck am I saying?"
Most other people here likely wonder about you too...

Communism is classless; do you understand what that means?
Communists say this and this is how they get others interested in communism.

Do you believe they go in to some tent and say "okay, this is what communism is really about guys."?

Classless means there are NO RULERS.

Perhaps communists really don't want to live in a better society; why would anyone?

OleMarxco
6th May 2005, 10:01
It's almost like as if all those capitalists look to Soviet as the "shining example of Communism", as if it ever was but a degraded shit-hole, cold and freezing...have pity, we don't - Following the knowledge I have, of what Soviet was.....atleast NOT Communism, technically speaking. Most definately a leader-fault - but the country was already a bit bad-off after the tsars, and the petite burgeouise were longing for a better life, of course - I can understand that (Yes, I am still a human - seeing as it was rural people who became "Melsheviks"...the sickle failed them).....but they revolted - so they got what they had coming to them. It's not like anyone couldn't leave if they were mispleased with things - And their's opinion weren't the mayority (to revolt). But the biggest fault is for the State-Socialism it was to go straight from Feudalism to Communism. Everyone knows a successful Communism has, ironically enough, to go trough Capitalism first - It's the people's secret wish. Yes, I know: It's a bad ideology, but it "creates" the wealth and progress needed before one can "go over" to Socialism. That's my hold on it ;)

t_wolves_fan
6th May 2005, 12:29
So you advocate calling someone different things merely based on which genitals they currently have?

Yes. We have to. Why? Because biology dictates that different things happen to the two genders, and even the same things often happen differently and for different reasons.

We call plants different things based on the color and size of their petals, after all.


You believe that a group striving for equality is doomed to become tyranic? (Obviously you have never learned your American history then.)

Absolutely. A group striving for total socioeconomic equality is by definition tyrannical because they must limit individual rights to ensure this equality.

The American ideal of equality is equality under the law. Indeed, this is the only form of equality that can be enforced by the government that does not undermine individual rights.


You are convinced anyone who doesnt use english names for people is a bad person?

Of that I'm not so sure, since most of our English language is actually derived from German.


You, sir, are a fool.

Compared to most communists, he's Einstein.

ahhh_money_is_comfort
6th May 2005, 14:52
Originally posted by [email protected] 6 2005, 08:10 AM

I come here to reaffirm that communism won't work and that communism is a good way to make Adolf Hitlers.

Aldolf Hitler was strongly anti-communist. The NAZI party came to power by fanning the flames of anti-communism. This is pretty much common knowlege.
Sorry for generating confusion. When I mean a "Hitler", I mean bullets in the back of the head, secret mass graves, and brutal authority.

ahhh_money_is_comfort
6th May 2005, 14:56
Originally posted by XPhile2868+May 6 2005, 08:14 AM--> (XPhile2868 @ May 6 2005, 08:14 AM)
[email protected] 6 2005, 05:40 AM

Yes yes yes. I have heard the party line before. All the evil things communist dictators have done is not communism.
Can i ask you to do two things?

1. Read the Communist Manifesto, if that isnt too difficult.
2. Using your new found knowledge of Communism, study the actions of Stalin and Mao.

If you do these two simple things, i'm sure you will come to realize that Stalin is about as Communist as Dubya. [/b]
What you don't seem to understand is these evil tyrants came from communist revolutions and they rose to power under the systems of a communist organization.

In the next revolution? What ever the time and place, is this going to happen again? I wager 99.999999%, yes.

ahhh_money_is_comfort
6th May 2005, 15:00
Originally posted by [email protected] 6 2005, 11:29 AM


So you advocate calling someone different things merely based on which genitals they currently have?

Yes. We have to. Why? Because biology dictates that different things happen to the two genders, and even the same things often happen differently and for different reasons.

We call plants different things based on the color and size of their petals, after all.


You believe that a group striving for equality is doomed to become tyranic? (Obviously you have never learned your American history then.)

Absolutely. A group striving for total socioeconomic equality is by definition tyrannical because they must limit individual rights to ensure this equality.

The American ideal of equality is equality under the law. Indeed, this is the only form of equality that can be enforced by the government that does not undermine individual rights.


You are convinced anyone who doesnt use english names for people is a bad person?

Of that I'm not so sure, since most of our English language is actually derived from German.


You, sir, are a fool.

Compared to most communists, he's Einstein.
What ever non-communist history you look at and how evil and how much a failure it was, does not make communism right, efficient, or workable. Communism must prove itself by it's own merits.

bed_of_nails
6th May 2005, 15:11
QUOTE

So you advocate calling someone different things merely based on which genitals they currently have?



Yes. We have to. Why? Because biology dictates that different things happen to the two genders, and even the same things often happen differently and for different reasons.

We call plants different things based on the color and size of their petals, after all.

Based on your current beliefs I fear that one day parents will have to name their kids based on genital size then.

There is nothing wrong with calling a friend "Comrade" instead of "Sir" or "Miss". "Sir" and "Miss" generally imply that they are higher up on the social ladder than you are (or in the case of retail, that you are stooping down to get their money).


QUOTE
You believe that a group striving for equality is doomed to become tyranic? (Obviously you have never learned your American history then.)



Absolutely. A group striving for total socioeconomic equality is by definition tyrannical because they must limit individual rights to ensure this equality.

The American ideal of equality is equality under the law. Indeed, this is the only form of equality that can be enforced by the government that does not undermine individual rights.

So you are including in these "equally enforced" rights that dont undermine individual rights:

The Patriot Act
Slavery
The remaining racism after the Civil Rights movement
Women getting paid less than men


Here are a few examples I would like you to try and refute.

When I speak of slavery, I mean pre-civil war kind and modern wage-slavery.


QUOTE
You are convinced anyone who doesnt use english names for people is a bad person?



Of that I'm not so sure, since most of our English language is actually derived from German.


Wrong. The english language is comprised almost entirely of modified Latin and Greek.

Quis est tibi papa, rotundus nothus!


QUOTE
You, sir, are a fool.



Compared to most communists, he's Einstein.

Please spare me your petty attempt at insulting me because of my political affiliation.

You are merely stooping to the level of saying "Anyone who disagrees with me is stupid". Just two weeks ago you were praising me and telling me I was too smart for communism.

ahhh_money_is_comfort
7th May 2005, 09:16
Originally posted by [email protected] 6 2005, 02:11 PM

QUOTE

So you advocate calling someone different things merely based on which genitals they currently have?



Yes. We have to. Why? Because biology dictates that different things happen to the two genders, and even the same things often happen differently and for different reasons.

We call plants different things based on the color and size of their petals, after all.

Based on your current beliefs I fear that one day parents will have to name their kids based on genital size then.

There is nothing wrong with calling a friend "Comrade" instead of "Sir" or "Miss". "Sir" and "Miss" generally imply that they are higher up on the social ladder than you are (or in the case of retail, that you are stooping down to get their money).


QUOTE
You believe that a group striving for equality is doomed to become tyranic? (Obviously you have never learned your American history then.)



Absolutely. A group striving for total socioeconomic equality is by definition tyrannical because they must limit individual rights to ensure this equality.

The American ideal of equality is equality under the law. Indeed, this is the only form of equality that can be enforced by the government that does not undermine individual rights.

So you are including in these "equally enforced" rights that dont undermine individual rights:

The Patriot Act
Slavery
The remaining racism after the Civil Rights movement
Women getting paid less than men


Here are a few examples I would like you to try and refute.

When I speak of slavery, I mean pre-civil war kind and modern wage-slavery.


QUOTE
You are convinced anyone who doesnt use english names for people is a bad person?



Of that I'm not so sure, since most of our English language is actually derived from German.


Wrong. The english language is comprised almost entirely of modified Latin and Greek.

Quis est tibi papa, rotundus nothus!


QUOTE
You, sir, are a fool.



Compared to most communists, he's Einstein.

Please spare me your petty attempt at insulting me because of my political affiliation.

You are merely stooping to the level of saying "Anyone who disagrees with me is stupid". Just two weeks ago you were praising me and telling me I was too smart for communism.
Nope.

Someone else is calling me a fool, not you.

Kindda makes you look a little foolish doesn't it?

Any how I would like to continue that what ever capitalism or any non-communist system has done wrong, it does not prove communism right. Communism must stand on its own merits. Do you agree?