View Full Version : is this true?
{GR}Raine
21st April 2005, 21:27
Ok, once the proletariat overthrows the ruling class, how are laws made? and who makes them?
OleMarxco
21st April 2005, 21:36
Eh.....the proletariat, of course? ;)
bolshevik butcher
21st April 2005, 21:46
yeh i'd have thought that was pretty obvious!!!!!
{GR}Raine
21st April 2005, 21:56
Yes I know, but who writes the laws that we vote on?
OleMarxco
21st April 2005, 22:01
Uhm....we choose a guy or gal and calls them "law-writer": Their job will be to write a law. Equal in benefits as everyone else, of course, so no openings for "perks" for writing laws...or making up ones - They just write the laws the proletars vote for ;)
NovelGentry
21st April 2005, 22:07
Anyone should be able to write a law. Laws should be applied locally, upheld by the workers themselves "community enforcement" -- etc. But you could propose a "law" just the same as the next guy and get it to vote. If people agree, it's something you can seek to uphold.
I don't think you need a law writer per se. There are obvious laws, and most of the other laws we see today are designed to protect bourgeois property rights. So much of the superflouous bullshit that law makers write and lawyers interpret shouldn't be necessary.
{GR}Raine
21st April 2005, 22:13
ok, thank you. I was trying to tell this girl that the people write the laws, either that, or a comittee, of the best law-making professionals.
Freidenker
21st April 2005, 22:15
Originally posted by
[email protected] 21 2005, 09:07 PM
Anyone should be able to write a law. Laws should be applied locally, upheld by the workers themselves "community enforcement" -- etc. But you could propose a "law" just the same as the next guy and get it to vote. If people agree, it's something you can seek to uphold.
I don't think you need a law writer per se. There are obvious laws, and most of the other laws we see today are designed to protect bourgeois property rights. So much of the superflouous bullshit that law makers write and lawyers interpret shouldn't be necessary.
Gent, you're such a cutie. Haha.
Naturally the people would vote on it. Community run society. Picture you're entire town working as one unified equal people.
SpeCtrE
1st May 2005, 13:08
Laws are only made to be broken... we don't need them
ANARCHY < DRUGS > BOOZE > CAMARADERIE> AK>
Essential Insignificance
2nd May 2005, 03:43
Eh.....the proletariat, of course
Wrong.
The proletariat class will cease to exist.
The communistic revolutionary movement seeks to systematically destroy capitalism and the class distinctions that it "naturally" gives rise too.
It seeks to destroy all "class orientation".
The bourgeois and proletarian classes are essentially "characterized" by their "social relations" to the means of production.
If you destroy the "system" that gives rise to this occurrence... you in turn, destroy the classes that arise out of it.
Therefore the proletarian (and bourgeoisie) class "will be a thing of the past".
The Z-Man
3rd May 2005, 00:42
Originally posted by {GR}
[email protected] 21 2005, 08:56 PM
Yes I know, but who writes the laws that we vote on?
The workers. The people.
Dwarf Kirlston
3rd May 2005, 04:24
... "is this true" - "how are ____ and ____"
It is not true!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.