Log in

View Full Version : Protest against WAL-MART



red_orchestra
20th April 2005, 04:23
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. says it will close one of its Canadian stores, just as some 200 workers at the location are near winning the first-ever union contract from the world's largest retailer.

Wal-Mart said it was shuttering the store in Jonquiere, Quebec, in response to unreasonable demands from union negotiators that would make it impossible for the store to sustain itself.

"We were hoping it wouldn't come to this," Andrew Pelletier, a spokesman for Wal-Mart Canada, said Wednesday. "Despite nine days of meetings over three months, we've been unable to reach an agreement with the union that in our view will allow the store to operate efficiently and profitably."

Pelletier said the store will close in May. The retailer had first discussed closing the Jonquiere store last October, saying the store was losing money.

The United Food & Commercial Workers Canada asked Quebec labor officials to appoint a mediator last week, saying negotiations with Wal-Mart had reached an impasse.

Union leaders dismissed Wal-Mart's reasons for closing the store and promised to fight the move.

"Wal-Mart has fired these workers not because the store was losing money but because the workers exercised their right to join a union," Michael J. Fraser, national director of UFCW Canada, said in a written statement. "Once again, Wal-Mart has decided it is above the law and that the only rules that count are their rules."

Wal-Mart's decision to close the store reflects the retailer's deeply rooted aversion to unions, and its worries that organized labor had nearly established a beachhead, said Burt Flickinger III of Strategic Resource Group, a consulting firm specializing in retailing and consumer goods.

But he said the move could backfire for Wal-Mart, which has worked hard to counter a wave of bad publicity and portray itself as a generous employer.

"The store closing may potentially catalyze the combination of the government (officials in Canada), organized labor and consumers working together against Wal-Mart," Flickinger said.

Claudia Tremblay, a cashier at the store, said many employees burst into tears when managers told them the news Wednesday morning.

"Many people cried, including myself," Tremblay said. "I'm a mother of two children and I'm separated from my husband. It's very difficult."

Tremblay said she abstained from the unionization vote. She said she was upset her noncommittal stance won't save her job.

The store in Jonquiere, about 240 miles northeast of Montreal, became the first unionized Wal-Mart store in North America last September, after the bargaining unit was certified by provincial labor officials. Since then, workers at a second Quebec store have also been granted union status. Neither has reached a contract.

The union efforts at both stores are part of a larger chess game labor organizers are waging with Wal-Mart at stores across Canada. The campaign, financed by UFCW money from both Canada and the United States, is also geared toward capturing workers' attention in Wal-Mart's home country.

The closest a U.S. union has ever come to winning a battle with Bentonville, Ark.-based company occurred in 2000 at a store in Jacksonville, Texas, where 11 workers in the store's meatpacking department voted to join and be represented by the UFCW.

That effort failed when Wal-Mart eliminated the job of meatcutter companywide, and shifted from in-store meatcutting to stocking only pre-wrapped meat.

Recently, some workers in the tire department of a Wal-Mart store in Colorado have sought union representation, and the National Labor Relations Board has said it intends to schedule a vote.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm pissed...but the move doesn't surpise me. I'm supporting the union members and activist groups who will be handing out information at local Wal-Marts informing the public of the abuses that have been occuring. Actually...I'd like to block access to Walmart using a few cement barcades...

Aurora(inactive)
20th April 2005, 05:19
I hate wal-mart. They do all this nasty shit behind close doors, yet they can't sell un edited c.d's!

Plus a wal-mart came to my town and killed most of the local businesses. stupid shit-cocks.

aztecklaw
20th April 2005, 07:56
You think that's the worst of it?

This is what really pisses me off about that store chain:

http://www.azcentral.com/specials/special0...rtfinal-ON.html (http://www.azcentral.com/specials/special03/articles/0217walmartfinal-ON.html)

When Wal-Mart began construction last year on a store near some of Mexico's most famous Aztec ruins, protesters showed up by the thousands.

Aurora(inactive)
20th April 2005, 18:41
Oh I know they do way worst stuff than what I mentioned. I'm going to e-mail my dad that link. He can go off for hours about Wal-Mart.

red_orchestra
20th April 2005, 19:18
good news...labour union leaders will be protesting outside several undisclosed WalMart locations. This will happen in Quebec, Ontario and BC as far I know. Still, I'm generating a list as we speak.

coda
20th April 2005, 21:39
What dirty tactics. Of course Walmart could pay their employees at Union wages. Their yearly profits are larger than the ecomonies of 7 developed countries, and all undeveloped countries.

Well, it's good to know how we can get rid of Walmarts Inc. atleast -- Unionize every store.
Who needs them? Just as long as the workers are able to get unemployment benefits from the State and find better jobs thereafter.

Nothing Human Is Alien
20th April 2005, 22:03
Here's a website with very comprehensive coverage on Wal-Mart and the recent events it has been involved in http://www.labourstart.org/wal-mart/

red_orchestra
21st April 2005, 01:15
Originally posted by [email protected] 20 2005, 08:39 PM
What dirty tactics. Of course Walmart could pay their employees at Union wages. Their yearly profits are larger than the ecomonies of 7 developed countries, and all undeveloped countries.

Well, it's good to know how we can get rid of Walmarts Inc. atleast -- Unionize every store.
Who needs them? Just as long as the workers are able to get unemployment benefits from the State and find better jobs thereafter.
:P heheh, thats very true! Force WalMart to unionize and they will run scared...no more WALMART ---victory for the working class :rolleyes: of course they will have to find new jobs, which may be a little tough. Oh well. :lol:

red_orchestra
4th May 2005, 18:23
..sorry about the double post :)

This Saturaday their will be a protest against the breaking-up of Unions--and the closure of the Quebec store by WalMart Corperation. Several other powerful unions will be aiding our cause...I hope to give an account of what happens. My feeling is WalMart will be trying their best to kick us off their property...who knows.
Anyone else protesting?

MKS
4th May 2005, 18:55
of course they will have to find new jobs, which may be a little tough. Oh well.

yeah, oh well. What a bunch of crap. I know Wal Mart is one of the worst companies in the US, not sure of thier Canadian situation. However, the jobs at Wal Mart arent that bad compared to other working conditions in other nations including canada and USA. Its easy to be glad at the "downfall" of such a capitalist giant, however it is very disheartening to see the numerous people who now will have no source of income. And with the unemployment situation in Canada it wont be easy for them to find re-employment.

Im just as anti-wal mart as the next guy, but there has to be a balance in this current econmoic climate. Labour unions are great but sometimes they ask too much (not realising that thier demands could cause to shut downs and layoffs, much like the American auto industry), and speak not for the labour but for a small portion of the labour. As a member of a large union I see this type of action all the time. The union dosent care about the workers so much as they care about their power.

bolshevik butcher
4th May 2005, 20:34
you sound like a typical libreal, these people are safgurading there jobs, and all you do is criticize them.

MKS
4th May 2005, 21:14
you sound like a typical libreal, these people are safgurading there jobs, and all you do is criticize them

How are they safeguarding their jobs? Obviously they had no clue that wal mart would be willing to close rather than succumb to pressure from the union, the union should have known this, it is irresponsible and hypocritical to endanger the jobs of the same people you claim to be helping.

I know many revolutionaries dont like to hear the word bablnce or compromise, but the reality is that the people who once had a job now do not. Not very good for the working man. And the admission that such a loss is ok as long as Wal-Mart closes is ubsurd. Do you think Wal Mart has really lost anything? Not at all, its a drop in the bucket to them. However the workers have lost an important source of income, which may be almost impossible to recover.

red_orchestra
5th May 2005, 09:47
hey, all i'm trying to do is educate the masses about the true nature of WalMart. I'm not preventing anyone from working...
MKS, WalMart unions had formed across North America because of the Corperations notoriously bad reputation for putting untrained people in DANGEROUS situations. As well their are several large cases in both the US and Canada where customer safety has been put at risk because this corperation wanted to save money...

Domingo
5th May 2005, 15:00
This is rather funny to me. Yes, Wal-Mart is one of the greatest examples of corporate greed, but being as it is, it is also the most powerful.

I favor and encourage protest, but a couple of people with signs wont stop a corpoate empire that is global. I always have to be the downside of things!

The only way you could beat Wal-Mart is to kill it economicly, via: a store better than Wal-Mart. Fight money with money. That is the only way that you could truely do it in my mind, beside using a little bit of SEMTEX global wide.

MKS
5th May 2005, 15:54
MKS, WalMart unions had formed across North America because of the Corperations notoriously bad reputation for putting untrained people in DANGEROUS situations

But what the unions fail to understand either through ignorance or arrogance, is that Wal-Mart can operate without giving into concessions from the union. They can close a store and wont be affected financially. The only way to stop a giant like wal mart is through governemt intervention, which will probably never happen. Until the giant is stopped, the unions must be careful not to put workers jobs at risk, like what happened in canada.

Like I said befroe Wal Mart is not a very bad place to work, compared to other working conditions inside and outside of north america. For many people, Wal Mart is the only employer in thier towne.

Is protesting Wal Mart a good idea, sure it is, boycotts are more effective, and produce the kind of results that motivate change, if the companies profit margins fall due to boycott, their will be real change. As long as their are consumers who do not care about wal mart's labour practices, discrimination, and use of sweatshop production, than wal mart will always be around.

The consumers, the people could be Wal Marts strongest opponent, educate the consumer, give them alternatives, and soon the giant will fall. Do not put working peoples jobs at risk by staging grandiose union protests and demands, which are shallow and motivated not out of intrest for the workers but in the intrest of growth and power for the union.

986Boobop424
8th May 2005, 00:23
You jackasses shouldn't just protest against Wal-Mart, you should be attacking their corporate headquarters and then attacking the stores as well. But you know, everybody wants to fight the Mahatma Gandhi way. :rolleyes:

red_orchestra
9th May 2005, 17:44
The protest worked out very well..
Several Unions banded up together to inform the public of the anti-union behavior Wal-Mart was showing. The general public in seemed fairly shocked to find out about Quebec WalMart closure.

...no police, but several security officers showed up. It was fairly peaceful protest.

OleMarxco
9th May 2005, 19:57
...........................And that's not a good thing :D
Or perhaps not. If not: That is a good thing because? ;)