Originally posted by
[email protected] 23 2005, 01:56 PM
Thank you for the Info my friends, I never new so much was out there. Also what about
one claimimng that she and many other middle class were forced from their homes to relocate while giving their home to someone else? One also stated she was forced to flee because of her political beleifs.
Do you think there is Any validity to this ?
The middle class in Venezuala may not relate directly to the rich, but they are still the upper crust of their society. In Venezuala the middle class really do prop up the rich, as they too benefit from the rich folks endevours. Chavez works for the good of the poor, thus the middle class (having always acted as a prop for the the wealthy) become "victims" of Chavez' policy.
However in the true context of things, the poor make up more than half the nation. As such these women do truly have legitimate problems regarding Chavez, but they are not seeing it in the proper context. It's simple to see how they would feel that way, they themselves are being made to suffer to help the poor. Chavez does reposses wealthy estates and redistribute them, he is nationalizing industries. It is a bad thing for the wealthy, which also equates to problems for the middle class.
Who cares about the middle class, let them have a little taste of suffering. They know nothing of the destitution that their support of the wealthy helped foster. Generally (also true in the case of Cuba) most refugee's that end up in America are former wealthy folks, that could no longer exploit their native system well enough to keep them wealthy. Hence their abandonment of their nation, simply to be able to have the "opportunity" to exploit folks somewhere else.
Edit:
You asked for sources.
http://www.wsws.org/sections/category/news/am-samer.shtml
The world socialist website does a really good job of dissecting world problems from a workers stand point. Scroll down to the beginning of the entire Chavez conflict to see what happened.