Iepilei
27th February 2005, 10:07
Among the readings in the scientific community, nothing I've read fascinates me more than the prospect of advanced gene therapy. The ability to essentially eliminate hazardous genetic-based diseases may bode well for the future of humanity.
This brings me to my point: Do you think that people planning to have children and have a known or detectable history of genetic diseases should be required to undergo gene therapy for the betterment of the child? Especially in parents with problems such as asthsma and diabetes?
What do you think?
This brings me to my point: Do you think that people planning to have children and have a known or detectable history of genetic diseases should be required to undergo gene therapy for the betterment of the child? Especially in parents with problems such as asthsma and diabetes?
What do you think?