Iran do we wait or do we move? [Archive]

View Full Version : Iran do we wait or do we move?

Big_Don

26th February 2005, 13:57

Iran and its Biologial weapons
All signs point to a terrible thing upcoming possible nuclear weapons and of course biological weapons. Iran do we wait or do we move? How much longer do we give the european union to resolve this.

Non-Sectarian Bastard!

26th February 2005, 14:01

What are you talking about?

Please, don't start threads with one line.

redstar2000

26th February 2005, 15:47

I smell another pro-imperialist thread coming. :angry:

http://www.websmileys.com/sm/cool/123.gif

MeTaLhEaD

26th February 2005, 18:57

I smell a poser... with a che guevara avatar

Sabocat

26th February 2005, 19:05

I smell another tragically uninformed, uncaged cappie.

:lol:

So are you saying that any country that develops weapons should be a target of the U.S.?

Are you saying you advocate "pre-emptive strikes"?

Red Robe Majere

26th February 2005, 19:45

i smell a pro-imperialist also but if we do go to war at this rate a revolution will a walk in the park since the us's soliders will be all over the middle east

codyvo

26th February 2005, 20:34

Why is it that middle eastern nations aren't allowed to have nuclear weapons but we are?

dso79

26th February 2005, 23:03

I haven’t seen much concrete evidence that proves that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, but with the recent US/Israeli threats against them, it’s not hard to see why they might want them. And as long as countries like the US are holding on to their nukes it’s hypocritical to forbid other countries from having them.

Why is it that middle eastern nations aren't allowed to have nuclear weapons

That’s not true. There is one middle eastern nation that is allowed to have nukes...

MeTaLhEaD

26th February 2005, 23:34

Originally posted by [email protected] 26 2005, 11:03 PM
I haven’t seen much concrete evidence that proves that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, but with the recent US/Israeli threats against them, it’s not hard to see why they might want them. And as long as countries like the US are holding on to their nukes it’s hypocritical to forbid other countries from having them.

Why is it that middle eastern nations aren't allowed to have nuclear weapons

That’s not true. There is one middle eastern nation that is allowed to have nukes...
yes the fucking zionist pigs

Iepilei

27th February 2005, 01:04

They're just going to keep spreading the force so thin that eventually the cost of supporting them will be too great to bear.

Put your sunglasses on, kids, and wait for the ride.

:ph34r:

KrazyRabidSheep

27th February 2005, 01:45

All things point to Iran possesing nuclear weapons?
All things pointed to Iraq possesing biological weapons!

Iepilei

27th February 2005, 01:54

Originally posted by [email protected] 27 2005, 01:45 AM
All things point to Iran possesing nuclear weapons?
All things pointed to Iraq possesing biological weapons!
Until we get there and find the whole thing was a farce.

Oops!

:ph34r:

Red Robe Majere

27th February 2005, 02:03

Lol. nice

Paradox

27th February 2005, 02:17

That’s not true. There is one middle eastern nation that is allowed to have nukes...

Israel. <_<

Also Pakistan. Another ally in the war on "terror." <_<

Red Robe Majere

27th February 2005, 02:21

Iraq might have someform of a nuke but it is owned and made by the us

Wurkwurk

28th February 2005, 02:53

Originally posted by [email protected] 26 2005, 06:57 PM
I smell a poser... with a che guevara avatar
Uh huh. Got that right.

QUOTE:
All things point to Iran possesing nuclear weapons?
All things pointed to Iraq possesing biological weapons!

:lol: how true that is!

We should be more worried of the US using its unique weapon of mass destruction: its president. Its already been used once, and the consquences are well known.

Watch out for Israel too. Who knows what a bunch of paranoid jews surrounded by muslims will do with a nuclear warhead? They're FAR more likely to use them than Iran, that is, if they had any :P

bolshevik butcher

28th February 2005, 18:34

The U$ wouldn't go near iran if it actually had a nuke :P

codyvo

4th March 2005, 22:13

boy you best not drop that yellow cake, god help us if you drop that yellow cake

Mitch Flo

4th March 2005, 23:56

I don't think we are going to attack Iran any time soon, syria would back them up and that would lead to WWIII, which america can't quite afford...

Jina

24th March 2005, 05:44

Originally posted by [email protected] 27 2005, 02:17 AM

That’s not true. There is one middle eastern nation that is allowed to have nukes...

Israel. <_<

Also Pakistan. Another ally in the war on "terror." <_<

Why is it that middle eastern nations aren't allowed to have nuclear weapons but we are? :rolleyes: Iran is not a Middle Eastern nation and same goes for Pakistan... get your geography right... god you guys are bunch of typical Westerner but say idiotic thing like revolution and all that crap... but don't have a clue what you guys are talking about.