Log in

View Full Version : oppose osama but support castro? - hypocrisy!!!!



new democracy
5th August 2002, 08:49
do you oppose bin-laden but support castro? if you are your an hypocrite!!! castro let the ussr put nuclear missiles in cuba!!!! if the missiles were launched they were kill more civilians then osama kiled!!!

oconner
5th August 2002, 16:08
but they weren't lauched and probably never would have been. Castro would never kill innocent cilvilians, bin Laden would.

Anonymous
5th August 2002, 16:29
So anybody with Missisles is as bad as osama? Doesnt say much for the American authorities. Their arsenal could kill countless civilians!

j
5th August 2002, 17:33
Yes, the USSR put missles in Cuba. But the USA put missles in Afganistan before the USSR put them in Cuba. The USSR was responding to the USA's missle placement. (You can even watch that movie, 13 days [isn't that what it was called] with Kevin Costner).

To follow your logic, JFK would be the same as Castro and in turn the same as Osama. I would place neither Castro or JFK in the ranks of Osama bin Laden. While I'm on the topic of killing innocent civilians, you need to put Reagan and Bush on an equal plane (no pun intended) with bin Laden. Remember Nicaragua? How about the Mosque in Lebanon? The USA supported the killing of innocent civilians in these two places. Tell me when Castro killed innocent civilians.

j

Vladimir
5th August 2002, 18:54
Dont ya hate these anti commy know nothing at all, they post some untrue lies and then ppl respond and he shuts up and leaves.
Fucking idiots!

IrishGuevara

Nateddi
5th August 2002, 18:56
speaking of nukes and cuba, the united states has more nukes than cuba ever did or ever will have. and we are the only nation in history to use them.

Dynatos
5th August 2002, 19:01
Osama attacked the WTC to kill. Castro let the U.S.S.R put missles in Cuba to Protect his people from american oppresion.

pastradamus
5th August 2002, 19:55
The missiles were to tell ameriKKKA to back up or get smacked up.

Reuben
5th August 2002, 21:24
All that cuba did was try to enable itself with the same weapons that an aggressive nation which had already attempeted to invade had at its disposal.

Although i must admire your logic that anyone who has nukes is as bad as Osama Bin Laden... very sophisticated

Supermodel
5th August 2002, 21:48
Well, it was really Kruschev who put the nukes on Cuba, there is really a lot of doubt about whatever Castro could do about it at all. He could neither order the missiles fired nor stop them.

bluerev002
5th August 2002, 21:59
hey new democracy? wered he go?

oh well i guess he got scared.

i could tell you stuff but its already been said, bin laden kills .........and castro didnt. simple sinchy and poof. its gone

j
6th August 2002, 15:52
It seems that new democracy is one of those idiots who comes accross a forum like che-lives, signs himself up, makes a post, and then leaves. People like this seem to think they are making a difference in the way we think. People like this do not want to debate. People like DieMoussaoui....I had a healthy debate with him and he fell off the end of the earth.

I just don't get some people sometimes. Does he think that he is actually right? Does he even know what happened during the "cuban missle crisis?"

j