what's against big brother in these aspects

[Anonymous]

isnt a system of almost full control necessary to prevent all crime
to keep a left-wing community alive,
there is need to prevent agression i guess because otherwise if people set themselves up against each-other they would fight for power over the other one.
and that causes hate, discrimination, racism and so on

[honest intellectual]

In a socialist society, there would be little motivation to commit crime. Most crime is a result of capitalist competition.
There will of course always be a certain amount of crime, but there is no need to go to the lengths of big brother-esque monitoring. Such crime would be dealt with in the same way as it is now

[Socialmalfunction]

i agree, in a state where everyone is equal you really wouldnt have a need to commit a crime because your possession would be equal too. i dont think BB monitoring would be neccessary except in extreme cases of like martial law.

[Infamy]

in the perfect society, there is no crime. . . . i agree with you on that, but to get to that point, what will it take? you know not everyone will take to the new changes. there will always be people who belive otherwise. i mean come on now, look at us!