Were is the revolution you speak of?

[crazyman]

I have been hearing about a communest revolution but haven't seen anything.
You guys are all talk and no bite.
Also inorder to do this wouldn't you need most of the United States military on your side?

Good luck on this revolution.

[Zingu]

We need no-one on our side; we are on the working class's side. All we need is a revolutionary counscience to be realized among the working class, that is our goal as communists, not to lead the revolution by any means. Its not "our" revolution that will happen, it will be the proletarian's revolution.

Once that happens; a firestorm will start that no army or power will be able to suppress forever.

[New Tolerance]

Good luck on this revolution.

thanks. ;)

[crazyman]

Originally posted by New [email protected] 4 2005, 03:14 AM

Good luck on this revolution.

thanks. ;)
You are going to need all of the luck you can get.

[StrikeSDX]

Originally posted by New [email protected] 4 2005, 03:14 AM

Good luck on this revolution.

thanks. ;)
LOL, Good luck... as in "Good Luck" before you're about to do a theatrical performance =D.

[New Tolerance]

I'm sure feudal monarchs have said similar things about liberal democrats.

[Zingu]

Originally posted by [email protected] 4 2005, 03:16 AM

You are going to need all of the luck you can get.


No luck is needed, it is invetiable.

[crazyman]

Originally posted by [email protected] 4 2005, 03:10 AM
We need no-one on our side; we are on the working class's side. All we need is a revolutionary counscience to be realized among the working class, that is our goal as communists, not to lead the revolution by any means. Its not "our" revolution that will happen, it will be the proletarian's revolution.

Once that happens; a firestorm will start that no army or power will be able to suppress forever.
Yeah and how many people do you have on your side now?

[New Tolerance]

how many liberal democrats were there in the middle of the Dark Ages?

[crazyman]

Hey wasn't there one revolution in Russia a while back?
What happed there that you now dissown them?

[Zingu]

Originally posted by [email protected] 4 2005, 03:26 AM
Hey wasn't there one revolution in Russia a while back?
What happed there that you now dissown them?
Yes, only ONE revolution.

Unluckly, humans can be impatient.

Capitalism must run its course before a successful revolution is going to be achieved.

Think of it like a snake shedding skin.

Feudalism was kept in place until it was rendered outmoded and useless by the new effects of technology and social factors.
Feudalism was then "shed" by humankind in a global Capitalist takeover or revolution.
Now Capitalism must run its destructive force; until it is also outmoded and overthrown by the proletariat.

Russia, by 1917, was by no means capitalist.

The Russian Revolution was a Marxist-Leninist lead revolution.

I am not a Leninist.

I hope that is simple enough.

[RhetoricalAbsurdity]

Originally posted by StrikeSDX+Feb 4 2005, 03:17 AM--> (StrikeSDX @ Feb 4 2005, 03:17 AM)
New [email protected] 4 2005, 03:14 AM

Good luck on this revolution.

thanks. ;)
LOL, Good luck... as in "Good Luck" before you're about to do a theatrical performance =D. [/b]
Actually, that would be bad luck, and you'd probably be yelled at for saying that. The correct phrase would be "break a leg." And thanks.

[redstar2000]

Originally posted by crazyman
Were is the revolution you speak of?

I was going to suggest that you check under your bed...but looking at the thread title you posted, perhaps it's hiding beneath the dusty covers of your dictionary.

http://www.websmileys.com/sm/cool/123.gif

[progressive thinker]

Originally posted by New [email protected] 4 2005, 03:22 AM
how many liberal democrats were there in the middle of the Dark Ages?
That is good, but how many people could actually have a political opinion in the dark ages? The king/queen was the only one. Just consider how many of them said lets convert to Catholicism/Church of England/Puritinism.

As for any revolution gaining steam. Just watch out, the citizens of this country are well armed and most of them don't like any sort of big government.

[StrikeSDX]

Originally posted by RhetoricalAbsurdity+Feb 4 2005, 03:33 AM--> (RhetoricalAbsurdity @ Feb 4 2005, 03:33 AM)
Originally posted by [email protected] 4 2005, 03:17 AM

New [email protected] 4 2005, 03:14 AM

Good luck on this revolution.

thanks. ;)
LOL, Good luck... as in "Good Luck" before you're about to do a theatrical performance =D.
Actually, that would be bad luck, and you'd probably be yelled at for saying that. The correct phrase would be "break a leg." And thanks. [/b]
Okay, I'll do the equivelent of saying MacBeth before a performance then...

[Guest1]

The US will be the last, and least important step in the revolutionary process.

By the time it comes around to the US, the success of the revolution will be a foregone conclusion.

That process has already begun in many places across the world, and it will continue to establish itself over the coming century.

As for Russia, remember that France's revolution failed spectacularly, resulting in Napoleon, before Capitalist revolutions were able to take root in Europe.

[New Tolerance]

That is good, but how many people could actually have a political opinion in the dark ages? The king/queen was the only one. Just consider how many of them said lets convert to Catholicism/Church of England/Puritinism.

As for any revolution gaining steam. Just watch out, the citizens of this country are well armed and most of them don't like any sort of big government.

religions are political opinions, and most people had those.

and just what the heck are governments? (from where you are standing)