ComradeChris
11th February 2005, 21:05
Originally posted by
[email protected] 10 2005, 10:10 PM
I've seen it , basically they try to blame either Moore for distorting information or they try and blame all of bush's wrong doings on clinton. Which is sort of true, its not that we believe that bush was the mastermind behind all this, its the government, whether it be clinton or bush. But they try to clear Bush by blaming clinton for not apprehending Osama when he had the chance, i forget what country had him, but they offered him to the states and clinton turned them down. But the arguments they have about Moore and so pointless, like this one part they show a clip of Fahrenheit where moore shows a newspaper headlining that Gore won in Florida, when in that article was never printed and moore fabricated it. And its just like, well yea ok he lied about that, but so what, there are bigger truths in the movie than petty little lies.
It was Bush who right after he came into office cut the terrorism budget so he could give his wealthy tax cuts. Also they're blaming the Clinton administation for the poor equipment the army has. Well Bush went to war, he should have been the one to increase that funding. It's just more distortions of the truth. I mean Mikael Moore is one sided...there's no doubt about that. But when you're trying to prove a point, you don't include information that could possibly be a set-back. That's just the Repukelicken's rhetoric I guess. Like the:
orwellian doublethink.
SLAVERY IS FREEDOM
TRUTH IS A LIE