Looking back at election results

[New Tolerance]

Not sure if someone's already pointed this out, but here are some facts concerning the voters from the 2004 US election:

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/res...0/epolls.0.html (http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html)

1% of the voters who earn more than 100,000 dollars a year voted for Nader.
While 0% of the voters who earn less than 100,000 dollars a year voted for Nader.

It would also appear that generally the more educated you are the more likely you are to vote for Kerry.

About 23% of the voters who were gay, or bisexual actually voted for Bush (how is this freaking possible?!).

[FriedFrog]

The majority of the Union workers voted for Kerry. Thats interesting.
Probably shows that the Unionists (and therefore further left, usually) voted for Kerry. Wheter or not it was a 'lesser of two evils' vote is still unsure, obviously, but he seems to be their faviroute.

And heres something i don't really understand:

Why did 6% of Republicans vote for Kerry? <_<

[NovelGentry]

Well they obviously rounded. I&#39;m guessing if they were more precise you&#39;d be able to see a lot more out of it, at least in Nader&#39;s direction. He&#39;s sorta "robbed" by the rounding, particularly in the place where it looks like rich people voted for him.

As far as the homosexual vote going for Bush, there&#39;s this rather famous homosexual web logger who supported Bush. I wouldn&#39;t be surprised if his influence and other&#39;s like him is felt in that community. He was on real time with Bill Maher a few times. I was always amazed at how anyone homosexual could vote for someone who very strictly opposed their equal rights, but I suppose watching out for terrorists is much more important&#33; Can&#39;t get married if you&#39;re dead cause Saddam killed you with WMDs that don&#39;t exist&#33; :lol: