Log in

View Full Version : Work As A Prostitute Or Risk Losing Benefits



Skeptic
30th January 2005, 21:27
'Work As A Prostitute
Or Risk Losing Benefits'
By Clare Chapman
The Telegraph - UK
1-29-5

A 25-year-old waitress who turned down a job providing "sexual services" at a brothel in Berlin faces possible cuts to her unemployment benefit under laws introduced this year.
Prostitution was legalised in Germany just over two years ago and brothel owners ñ who must pay tax and employee health insurance ñ were granted access to official databases of jobseekers.
The waitress, an unemployed information technology professional, had said that she was willing to work in a bar at night and had worked in a cafe.
She received a letter from the job centre telling her that an employer was interested in her "profile" and that she should ring them. Only on doing so did the woman, who has not been identified for legal reasons, realise that she was calling a brothel.
Under Germany's welfare reforms, any woman under 55 who has been out of work for more than a year can be forced to take an available job ñ including in the sex industry ñ or lose her unemployment benefit. Last month German unemployment rose for the 11th consecutive month to 4.5 million, taking the number out of work to its highest since reunification in 1990.
The government had considered making brothels an exception on moral grounds, but decided that it would be too difficult to distinguish them from bars. As a result, job centres must treat employers looking for a prostitute in the same way as those looking for a dental nurse.
When the waitress looked into suing the job centre, she found out that it had not broken the law. Job centres that refuse to penalise people who turn down a job by cutting their benefits face legal action from the potential employer.
"There is now nothing in the law to stop women from being sent into the sex industry," said Merchthild Garweg, a lawyer from Hamburg who specialises in such cases. "The new regulations say that working in the sex industry is not immoral any more, and so jobs cannot be turned down without a risk to benefits."
Miss Garweg said that women who had worked in call centres had been offered jobs on telephone sex lines. At one job centre in the city of Gotha, a 23-year-old woman was told that she had to attend an interview as a "nude model", and should report back on the meeting. Employers in the sex industry can also advertise in job centres, a move that came into force this month. A job centre that refuses to accept the advertisement can be sued.
Tatiana Ulyanova, who owns a brothel in central Berlin, has been searching the online database of her local job centre for recruits.
"Why shouldn't I look for employees through the job centre when I pay my taxes just like anybody else?" said Miss Ulyanova.
Ulrich Kueperkoch wanted to open a brothel in Goerlitz, in former East Germany, but his local job centre withdrew his advertisement for 12 prostitutes, saying it would be impossible to find them.
Mr Kueperkoch said that he was confident of demand for a brothel in the area and planned to take a claim for compensation to the highest court. Prostitution was legalised in Germany in 2002 because the government believed that this would help to combat trafficking in women and cut links to organised crime.
Miss Garweg believes that pressure on job centres to meet employment targets will soon result in them using their powers to cut the benefits of women who refuse jobs providing sexual services.
"They are already prepared to push women into jobs related to sexual services, but which don't count as prostitution," she said.
"Now that prostitution is no longer considered by the law to be immoral, there is really nothing but the goodwill of the job centres to stop them from pushing women into jobs they don't want to do."
© Copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 2005.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/

pandora
30th January 2005, 22:31
I think this is a good addition to the employment article printed above under articles. This is a natural consequence of the capitalist system. It is telling that in supposedely "third world countries" the state would not legally force a woman to work as a prostitute, but in the capitalist "first world" they would.

It's sad to say, but if I were that woman I would come up with a religous reason for not taking the position and let it play out in the newspapers. :P The church would get very angry at a "parisioner" being forced into "sin" and it would be the begining of a nice big cat fight! :lol:

This is worse than even in the United States where there is no dole, and unemployment is almost impossible to receive, where I live your past employer has to give it to you as a gift :lol: and can refuse for any reason, as it is determined that the only reason, and this is stated on the forms, for unemployment benefits is to benefit the economy not the unemployed :lol: plus it only lasts 6 months thanks to BUsh and then you're out on your ass.

As a result we've seen a 300% increase in the homeless population, but the government has decided to focus in the middle of winter on "permenant housing" ie. most likely with the most eligible for employment, and jailing or forcing the rest out of downtown areas so they won't bother shoppers :lol:

You see the biggest problem here according to the government with thousands of homeless street people without jobs roaming the streets and eating out of garbage cans who had jobs even in the past year, and were good employs is that it is unsightly and may bother the shoppers. So they simply allude that they must be GOTTEN RID OF, but don't say how.

KrazyRabidSheep
1st February 2005, 00:04
I had to stop and read the rest later.

The article literaly made me feel physicaly sick.

amusing foibles
1st February 2005, 01:14
Hooray for good old non-coercive capitalism...

Latifa
1st February 2005, 05:33
Ask the people in Parliment whether they would allow their sons or daughters to work as prositutes.