edwonders
25th January 2005, 02:21
Salutations,
Please find attached :
Permanent Revolution 'Che' 1024x768
Download at will if it catches your fancy.
The following 'explanation' has been posted post-'critique' by 'JudgeKure' & 'Tupac'.
Explanation:
Different people focus on different things or bring into focus different things. That does not mean that a focus on one as opposed to another is preferable though this is not to say that it is not debatable. In this context, it depends on what the artist wants to highlight and how this is achieved.
Che, embedded within the communist symbol, with a blurred revolutonary background, harkens to his specific quest in a broader scheme transcending time and space (as denoted by the revolutonary background and it being blurred.) He is one perspective in a revolutionary time that extends beyond his. The background (permanent revolution) will always remain. Only the actors (i.e. che, etc.) will change.
As for superimposition with the Da Vinci piece (the nude man). This is an allusion to the need to study the basic nature of humanity systematically (as brought out by the symetry and almost perfect proportion of Da Vinci's work) whilst debating on the proper system required to nurture this identity. Da Vinci's piece also admirably illustrates the western european cultural movement away from the subjectivity of 'christian' europe towards the 'objectivity' of scientific critique. Thus my usage of this image with the entire piece.
Simply translated : Che's (amongst others) quest in the revolutionary history, present and future of humanity for an egalitarian society has to be pursued with an ongoing systematic analysis of the nature of humanity and the socio-economic-political conditions that will best provide it the nurturance it rightly deserves.
postscript:
please disseminate at pleasure. No copyright imposed as all that i am, and thus, all that i create, is but one variant of that which can be created from the cultural/material/genetic resources that has been passed on to myself, as it has to all others, from time immemorial. All that is, is a variational development of all that has been. One generation to the next adding strokes to a myriad of masterpieces-in-progress. I am but one in a line of persons transcending time and space, passing on that which i receive, including my own contribution which is itself a concoction of the concotive creation of selfsame others.
Copyright Is Arrogance
edwonders
Please find attached :
Permanent Revolution 'Che' 1024x768
Download at will if it catches your fancy.
The following 'explanation' has been posted post-'critique' by 'JudgeKure' & 'Tupac'.
Explanation:
Different people focus on different things or bring into focus different things. That does not mean that a focus on one as opposed to another is preferable though this is not to say that it is not debatable. In this context, it depends on what the artist wants to highlight and how this is achieved.
Che, embedded within the communist symbol, with a blurred revolutonary background, harkens to his specific quest in a broader scheme transcending time and space (as denoted by the revolutonary background and it being blurred.) He is one perspective in a revolutionary time that extends beyond his. The background (permanent revolution) will always remain. Only the actors (i.e. che, etc.) will change.
As for superimposition with the Da Vinci piece (the nude man). This is an allusion to the need to study the basic nature of humanity systematically (as brought out by the symetry and almost perfect proportion of Da Vinci's work) whilst debating on the proper system required to nurture this identity. Da Vinci's piece also admirably illustrates the western european cultural movement away from the subjectivity of 'christian' europe towards the 'objectivity' of scientific critique. Thus my usage of this image with the entire piece.
Simply translated : Che's (amongst others) quest in the revolutionary history, present and future of humanity for an egalitarian society has to be pursued with an ongoing systematic analysis of the nature of humanity and the socio-economic-political conditions that will best provide it the nurturance it rightly deserves.
postscript:
please disseminate at pleasure. No copyright imposed as all that i am, and thus, all that i create, is but one variant of that which can be created from the cultural/material/genetic resources that has been passed on to myself, as it has to all others, from time immemorial. All that is, is a variational development of all that has been. One generation to the next adding strokes to a myriad of masterpieces-in-progress. I am but one in a line of persons transcending time and space, passing on that which i receive, including my own contribution which is itself a concoction of the concotive creation of selfsame others.
Copyright Is Arrogance
edwonders