Log in

View Full Version : Senate Bill Defines 'Political Paranoia' As Mental



Skeptic
10th January 2005, 19:38
Incredible - Frist's Bill Defines
'Political Paranoia'
As 'Mental Illness'
From Christopher Rudy
1-10-5

"When the 109th Congress convenes in Washington in January, Senator Bill Frist, the first practicing physician elected to the Senate since 1928, plans to file a bill that would define 'political paranoia' as a mental disorder"

Wow! The medical-industrial complex and Big Brother growth industry will make a killing on these drug pushers while eliminating those pesky patriot types.

Might even help Wall Street show "growth" another year while these wolves devour what remains of the body politic. A true win/win for insanity. - CR

"If you're still convinced that President Bush won the election because Republicans figured out a way to hack into electronic voting machines, you've obviously got a problem," says Smith. (or see www.heartcom.org/20reasons.htm for the truth - CR)

"If we can figure out a way to ease your suffering by getting you into therapy and onto medication, that's something that we hope the entire 109th Congress will support."

Holy Nut-case! These guys aren't joking! Is that how far GONE "our" government is? Can you see where it's going if we let it? --CR


Opposing Bush - A Form of Mental Illness?

By Kurt Nimmo
1-7-5

It's not the stolen election or the war crimes committed in my name. It's not the fact Bush is a liar and a criminal. It's not the Strausscons in the White House and the Pentagon, plotting multiple wars in the Middle East and elsewhere. It's not Congress, sold out to neolibs, multinational corporations, and Wall Street loan sharks.

It's me.

I'm suffering from "political paranoia" and need Paxil, a prescription drug for the treatment of anxiety and depression. It's not the 100,000 dead killed by my government in Iraq. It's not torture or loose talk of nuking enemies. It is a serotonin imbalance in my brain. I suffer from any number of possible maladies­depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (thus writing this blog every day), and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. I suffer from mental illness and need help.

Congress may come to the rescue­and soon.

"When the 109th Congress convenes in Washington in January, Senator Bill Frist, the first practicing physician elected to the Senate since 1928, plans to file a bill that would define 'political paranoia' as a mental disorder, paving the way for individuals who suffer from paranoid delusions regarding voter fraud, political persecution and FBI surveillance to receive Medicare reimbursement for any psychiatric treatment they receive," writes Hermione Slatkin, Medical Correspondent for the Swift Report. "Rick Smith, a spokesman for Senator Frist, says that the measure has a good chance of passing­something that can only help a portion of the population that is suffering significant distress."

"If you're still convinced that President Bush won the election because Republicans figured out a way to hack into electronic voting machines, you've obviously got a problem," says Smith. "If we can figure out a way to ease your suffering by getting you into therapy and onto medication, that's something that we hope the entire 109th Congress will support."

Characterizing political dissent as a form of mental illness is the hallmark of authoritarian government. In China, for instance, forensic psychiatrists label dissent "political lunacy" (see Jacob Sullum, Head Games: What are the rules for defining mental illness?) and in Soviet Russia political dissenters were routinely cosigned to mental hospitals. Nowadays, with modern pharmacology, mental hospitals are no longer required­the mental hospital is internalized through chemical intervention.

No need for FEMA camps or "preventive detention" when we have a "medical armamentarium" of serotonin uptake inhibitors. All that is needed now is for Frist and the Republicans to devise a law defining "political paranoia" and determining that "political paranoiacs" are a threat to society.

You will take your Paxil­or something far more debilitating­and by court order. Recall Bush's effort to screen the entire population for mental illness, i.e., the New Freedom Initiative. Bush's commission found that "despite their prevalence, mental disorders often go undiagnosed" and recommended comprehensive mental health screening for "consumers of all ages." Naturally, Frist and the Republicans are mostly concerned about the "political paranoia" form of mental illness, as the above news item indicates.

As a "consumer," is it possible I am suffering from "political paranoia." or is the whole thing a product of my feverish imagination and the result of reading too many news items on the web?

Finally, note that I could not find mention of Frist and the classification of "political paranoia" after a lengthy Google news search. Mention of it only appeared on the Swift Report website. Rick Smith's above quote returned no results. Of course, this does not mean that Bill Frist and the Republicans do not consider the opposition­including more than a few Democrats­as mental cases and tinfoil hatters. Rush Limbaugh calls us nutters every day and millions of gullible Americans take what he says as gospel.

http://kurtnimmo.com/blog/index.php?p=485

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In America, the criminally insane rule and the rest of us, or the vast majority of the rest of us, either do not care, do not know, or are distracted and properly brainwashed into acquiescence." -- Kurt Nimmo

http://www.counterpunch.org/nimmo06172004.html

"No one in public life has the courage to explain how those people who died when New York City skyscrapers collapsed were killed by plans concocted by the same people who seek your votes on election day, and still talk about freedom and justice while they pocket checks from large corporations intent on profiting from rebuilding the faraway cities we reduce to rubble." -- John Kaminski

'Power Hour Blocks Kaminski At Last Miinute' http://www.worldnewsstand.net/04/John_Kaminski/3.htm

"Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to kill on that fateful morning, I would have done everything in my power to protect the American people." -- Lying Monkey Boy Bush, chimp off the old block

"Will the peons of America, the shirtless ones, the common folk, be cursed by failing to somehow stop the rise of America's Hitler?" -- Sherman H. Skolnick

From 'Bush White House Created Violence'

"We are a discreet sheep; we wait to see how the drove is going, and then we go with the drove." -- Mark Twain

http://www.rense.com/general61/emen.htm

Rage Against the Right
10th January 2005, 19:46
That BLOWS MY MIND. Thanks for bringing that to my attention I'll be sure to show it to a lot of people. I wish there were 1 or 2 politicians that weren't rat bastards.

NovelGentry
10th January 2005, 20:43
I'll do my best to get the bill when it goes on the floor. I can't find a draft yet, and I'm not sure of the name. As the article points out this seems as though it's going to piggy back the new freedom initiative. It will more than likely get passed because of the other seemingly good things in the new freedom initiative.

For a direct link to information on that you can see:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/newfreedom/toc-2004.html

NovelGentry
10th January 2005, 20:59
It would seem, as I pointed out because it's going to piggy back the new freedom initiative it is brought under the watchful eye of the new freedom commition on mental heatlh. From what I've found elsewhere such disorders will more than likely be classified as:

"Disorder of Infancy, Childhood, or Adolescents, Not Otherwise Specified"

In short, this broad category will fit any disorder which they claim to be a disorder... as it is non-specific if it is declare a disorder that does not meet the criterea of others, it will meet this.


Due to psychiatric influence, parents have been reported to Child Protective Services and charged with medical neglect for refusing to give their child a psychiatric drug, such as those currently under investigation for causing suicidal reactions. Parents have been charged with "medical neglect" for refusing psychiatric treatment—despite the fact that there is no scientific proof that there is anything medically wrong with the child.

The quote above is one way in which the drugging would be enforceable.

Check out: http://www.cchr.org/publications/brave.htm

It lists all these points as well as others which LEGALLY justify the grounds for such a bill. To know how it will truly pan out we'll probably have to wait for the bill itself.

Skeptic
11th January 2005, 19:39
Thanks for all the updates and info 'NovelGentry,' I passed it along.

trex
11th January 2005, 20:10
America is in a sad state and is over dosing on the snuff. :(

Discarded Wobbly Pop
11th January 2005, 21:07
Embrace insanity

encephalon
11th January 2005, 22:37
no better method of control exists than drugging one into submission. This has been going on for decades. It's simply the next logical step towards the the crest, then crash. Although definitely different in terms of technology, similar things have happened throughout history as empires build to their climax, then rapidly falter. This isn't something that might happen. It will, and a lot more.

Which brings me suddenly to thoughts of Rome. I'm not saying that communism is anywhere near a religion--hopefully you don't take it that way--but they are both, in a sense, ideologies that embrace the fall of an empire, and christianity was once an underground network much like communism exists today. Christians were persecuted in Rome, Communists in America. Both were reduced in number greatly--and, the question remains--will communism explode back into action as did Christianity?

Does anyone else see the connection here?

cormacobear
12th January 2005, 01:26
That's extremely frightening, If I lived in the United States that would be where I drew the line. With those kind of dangerous new powers in terrible hands I would move. That's where the risk outweighs the good of continueing to stick it out and fight the good fight.

encephalon
12th January 2005, 03:59
it's funny you say that, because the day election results were announced, application forms for canadian citizenship were downloaded by americans ten times more than previously.

Where do you suggest we move? Nobody wants us ;)

pandora
12th January 2005, 06:02
This is something many of us who have dissented in public have faced for a long time in professional situations. It is becoming more and more dangerous to have an opinion in the United States. I believed this, but more so when i returned from other countries such as Mexico where people were openly Communist. I began saying Marxist ideas publically just as ideas some people have in context to things and offering alternative points of view. At first people were shocked, but many people opened to share some ideas. But then later I found this intimacy created fear for those trying to hide their feelings professionally. That my presence became a dread for them that they were not living up to their ideals or mocking them even when I was silent, when I had no such intention.

Unfortunately I feel some of these sort of middle of the road leftists may agree with the idea of "political paranoia" out of fear of being associated with we who practice our beliefs and work for community is leftist ways.

Also I wanted to add that this is more severe than paxil and serotoin inhibitors. That now they are advising giving delusional clients electro stimulation.

That's right electric shock treatment to make you forget all your worries.
This is not a joke, and should not be taken as such, at expense of seeming paranoid :D politically paranoid. I think they will go after teachers, organizers, and leftists who have any public appearence, but are far enough down the totem pole to be "realligned" without too much political schism. I think evaluation for this new type of "mental illness" will be part of official licensure along with background tests and pee tests for almost all positions of authority in the United States.
I wish this were not true. Lets work against it, but I fear it's happening.
This is facism, on a world wide basis

bolshevik butcher
12th January 2005, 16:39
Originally posted by [email protected] 12 2005, 06:02 AM
This is something many of us who have dissented in public have faced for a long time in professional situations. It is becoming more and more dangerous to have an opinion in the United States. I believed this, but more so when i returned from other countries such as Mexico where people were openly Communist. I began saying Marxist ideas publically just as ideas some people have in context to things and offering alternative points of view. At first people were shocked, but many people opened to share some ideas. But then later I found this intimacy created fear for those trying to hide their feelings professionally. That my presence became a dread for them that they were not living up to their ideals or mocking them even when I was silent, when I had no such intention.

Unfortunately I feel some of these sort of middle of the road leftists may agree with the idea of "political paranoia" out of fear of being associated with we who practice our beliefs and work for community is leftist ways.

Also I wanted to add that this is more severe than paxil and serotoin inhibitors. That now they are advising giving delusional clients electro stimulation.

That's right electric shock treatment to make you forget all your worries.
This is not a joke, and should not be taken as such, at expense of seeming paranoid :D politically paranoid. I think they will go after teachers, organizers, and leftists who have any public appearence, but are far enough down the totem pole to be "realligned" without too much political schism. I think evaluation for this new type of "mental illness" will be part of official licensure along with background tests and pee tests for almost all positions of authority in the United States.
I wish this were not true. Lets work against it, but I fear it's happening.
This is facism, on a world wide basis
this is the kinda thing that starts with commies like us and goes on until it's being targeted at people like Ralph Nader, eventually only Neo Conservatives will be left :o

encephalon
12th January 2005, 20:43
it will further widen the gap politically, as the gap has widened financially. It will push people further left or further right. Though I don't think by any means it will be a "final blow" of sorts, that is the beginning of the condition for social revolution.

bolshevik butcher
14th January 2005, 13:57
Originally posted by [email protected] 12 2005, 08:43 PM
it will further widen the gap politically, as the gap has widened financially. It will push people further left or further right. Though I don't think by any means it will be a "final blow" of sorts, that is the beginning of the condition for social revolution.
How, it seems more likely to push everyone to the right.

encephalon
15th January 2005, 17:06
Historically, in times of war and political oppression, social viewpoints typically polarize in reaction. Those who leaned slightly towards the right go all the way right, Those who leaned to the left go further left.