Log in

View Full Version : Iranian resistance and West's anti-war movement



Conghaileach
30th December 2004, 19:58
CounterPunch
December 28, 2004

Iran 2004
The Resistance and the West's Anti-War Movement
By RON JACOBS

Imagine yourself coming of age in a country where speaking out against the government is severely repressed. Activism of any sort is met with torture, imprisonment and even death, all courtesy of the US-trained secret police employed by a ruler who owes his very existence to the CIA. In turn, the United States has access to the seemingly endless oil resources underneath your country's sands. Because you oppose the ruler, his decadence and his repressive government, you join an opposition movement. Many of its members are in prison and many have been executed by the regime.

Finally, after years of struggle and countless murders and tortures by the regime, the movement opposing the ruler and his government has reached across class, religion, and social situation to become the majority in the country. After months of mass demonstrations and some acts of resistance, the oppressive ruler is forced out of power. In the period that follows, all of the popular forces vie for a role in the new democratic political climate that has replaced the old regime. Then strange things began to happen. Thanks to a confluence of domestic and foreign influences and intrigue, social and political reactionaries hiding under the cloak of religion began to consolidate their power, taking over the reins of government and stealthily excluding all other popular voices from the discussions about your country's future. Soon, restrictions are applied to women's social standing and their employment and attire, worker-run oil wells are taken over by the religious leaders' militias, and these same militias fire into mass demonstrations opposed to this new repression, killing hundreds. Some groups who were part of the popular opposition to the old regime have joined ranks with the new regime, claiming that the regime's opposition to foreign powers (esp. the US) is more important than democracy. Your group begs to differ, believing that the only true way to ensure Iran's independence is by creating a truly democratic, popular and secular government. The next thing you know, the group you belong to is once again the object of repression. This time, more ominously, the government uses religion in addition to the state powers to enforce its will. Your insistence on a secular government makes you the enemy once again.

Full Article (http://www.counterpunch.org/jacobs12282004.html)

Severian
1st January 2005, 00:08
In practice, the Mujahedeen Khalq, under whatever name, became an agency of the Saddam Hussein regime some time back. They were based out of Iraq for many years, including during the Iran-Iraq war. Now they're looking for a new sponsor, and hope it'll be Washington.

From the linked article: "After the mullahs' consolidated their power, it meant going underground and waging armed struggle while simultaneously waging a popular political struggle around the issues of democracy and individual rights."

In reality, they waged a terrorist campaign against the will of most Iranians. At that time (early 80s), it was however possible to regard the Mujahedeen Khalq as well-meaning though misguided people. No longer (see above).

Their statements about Iran's nuclear program are no more inherently reliable than those of Chalabi and other Iraqi exiles about Iraq's weapons programs.

Their stated reasons for their statements are politically wrong; Iran has as much right as any country to develop nuclear weapons and nuclear power. If they were to develop weapons, it would tend to deter U.S. and Israeli aggression in the region. Nuclear power could give Iran a source of electricity that would outlast the finite oil reserves and promote a more rounded economic development of the country.

It might be pointed out as well that the Iranian regime has not, for the last 25 years, been unusually prone to military adventures, compared to other capitalist governments.