Log in

View Full Version : The Rise of Civilization



Zingu
18th December 2004, 01:06
I was looking into the alien threads, and I started typing about the development of civilization, so I decided to make it its own topic! I used quotes from other threads as well, interesting read.




Technological civilization (radio) is less than 100 years old.

That suggests that 0.00003 percent of all planets will have intelligent life.

And only 1 out of every 480,000,000 planets will have intelligent technological life.

That's the bad news. The good news is that planets are common as...well, dirt. Our galaxy probably has a couple of billion or more. Most are lifeless--too hot, too cold, no atmosphere, wrong kind of atmosphere, etc.

A few will be "lucky".

I think what we'll ultimately discover is that intelligent life with technological civilization is very rare...maybe only a half-dozen or a dozen varieties per galaxy.



I disagree (sort of)


I will post this again:

Our galaxy for example, contains about 200 billion stars. Lets make a crude and conservative estimate; lets say 10% of the stars are yellow stars like the sun, that 10% of this 10% has planets orbiting around them, that 10% has 10% earthlike planets, that 10% has 10% which has earthlike atmospheres and life forms growing on them, and 10% of that is intelligent life. so thats about 1 millionth of 200 billion stars;

thats 200,000 alien civilizations within our galaxy


Also in recent research by a computer simulation of the birth of planets, that many planets at the similar size of earth are easy to evolve out of rocky cores, masses coalesced between 80% to 130% were found with planets that were. This will increase probability

It also turns out that without a planet like Jupiter in orbit , it makes it 1,000 times more likely for a comet to smash into a planet making life destroying impact every 100,000 years or so. This is decrease the number a bit.

So, with probabilty, it favors the existance of many civilizations. Now here is the strange part, with a 10 billion old galaxy, there has been much time for other civilizations born before us to develop and so shouldn't these civilizations be emitting electromagnetic radiation that we can detect?
No radiation detected yet!


It might be because we can only detect the probability and when these planets attain such a level of development. Take this example:

Our solar system is about 4.5 billion years old, life started here on earth 4 to 5 billion years ago, only within the past million years has intelligent life developed on this planet, only in the past decades have we developed radio stations capable of sending radio waves into outer space.
But, 1 million years of the scale of billions is only an instant in comparison. So it is reasonable to say that many civilizations have rose, fell and perished before our ancestors even left the forests on earth.




Maybe there is sentient life out there. What then? Do we become friends with them, trading cultures, languages, goods and services?

No, if a advanced civilization found us, I think their first impulse would be to ignore us. To them, seeing such an inferior civilization, it would be like finding an ant pile,
would you stop, present yourself, demand to see the leader of the ants, present them with wonderous and advanced technology past their comprehesion, wave trinkets in front of their eyes?
Or keep walking on ignoring them?


Technological civilization (radio) is less than 100 years old.

True, but you have to take one thing into account, civilization has rised exponentially. Today we have 200 horsepowered engines, but the enegry avaible to a single human was far less during the most part of our history. Most of the time it was the power of our own hands, one eigth of horsepower. Humans roamed the earth has hunter gatherers. In terms on energy this has only changed within the last 100,000 years.

Within the past 10,000 years, the energy output has doubled, the invention of hand tools at the end of the Ice Age, which retarded human development for thousands of years.

Soon the discovery of arigculture lead to agarian life and then came the division of labor; this is were the transistion to slave society began. Now, one person could control the labour power of hundreds of slaves, enegry output had multiplied dramatically, soon rulers could command slaves to erect giant fortresses with the use of pulleys and cranes, soon giant cities arose from forests.

In energy terms of view 99.9% of our existance, our technological level has been only one step above animals. It has only been in the past few hundred years that humans have more than 1 horsepower avaible to them.

This changed with the industrial revolution, Newton's laws made it possible to reduce mechanics to a set of well defined equations, steam powered machines made it possible for humans to command tens to hundreds of horsepower, soon steamships introduced widespread international trade.

It took over 10,000 years for humanity to produce the modern face of Europe, with steam driven machines America industrialized within a century.

By the nineteeth century, Maxwell's mastery of electromagnetics set off a revolution of energy power. It made electrification of factories and cities possible, now steam machines would taken over by power dynamos.

Within the past 50 years the discovery of nuclear force has increased the power avaible to a single human by a factor of a million, we have increased the enegry power to us by a millionfold within 50 years, while it took before hundreds of years to increase horsepower.

For only .01% of our existance we have drastically increased our enegry levels far beyond animals. In just a few centuries we have released the forces of electromagnetism and nuclear power.

Basically, the further we progress, the faster we progress. We increase exponentially.


Source: "Hyperspace" by Michio Kaku, theoretical physicist

CorporationsRule
18th December 2004, 04:10
With agriculture came slavery and work, which you so insightfully put in bold.

With industrial society, slavery ended, work continued, and wage slavery began, along with the exponential increase in our ability to destroy each other and the planet on which we live.

With high-tech society came the rise in a bunch of morons hunched over computer screens all day, nuclear weapons, oil dependence, and the soon to be mass die-off of human beings as the oil energy on which our exponential growth is predicated begins to diminish and we overrun our biosphere.

And you call this progress.

Because I hate to see suffering, I hope to god your mathmatical logic is wrong and the rest of the universe was smart enough not to go anywhere near civilization.

Zingu
18th December 2004, 04:21
I mean progress as in technological and energy advancement, not in what it has produced in society.


Oil is only a primitive source as enegry. We have not harnessed the power of the oceans (there is alot of talk about the potentional of the oceans among the scientific community) which is a gold mine to be opened. Plus solar, electrical and nuclear power are examples of what can replace crude oil.

Exponential growth has already been seen throughout history to be a factor of human progression, but there are valid points you bring up, humankind does have obstacules to overcome, the mixed blessing of isotope 236, ecological collapse, lowering fertility rates ect.



Because I hate to see suffering, I hope to god your mathmatical logic is wrong and the rest of the universe was smart enough not to go anywhere near civilization.

Well, no pain, no gain......the shitty reality of life.....

ÑóẊîöʼn
18th December 2004, 05:45
Zingu, I disagree with your contention that advanced civilisations would ignore primitive ones. This seems to suggest that stone age man was more stupid than modern man, which is not true, he was simply less well informed.
An ant cannot grasp even the basic tenets of a philosophy, or understand a circuit diagram, or write poetry. This is because it is not sentient.

Sentience is the key. With sentience, it does not matter if you have been living in a cave all your life, given enough time you can understand the most advanced concepts that an interstellar civilisation can come up with. I personally do not feel that there is 'another level' of conciousness beyond sentience.

One more thing; people tend to forget just how massive time and space are, our own galaxy is mind-bogglingly big, the distance to the nearest star is so vast in human terms as to be unimaginable, the universe has existed for billions of years. Galaxies formed quite quickly after the big bang.

To get an idea of just how long the universe has been around, next time you are at the beach, think of every little grain of sand as a single year. Then look at all the sand around you. Disturbing eh?


With high-tech society came the rise in a bunch of morons hunched over computer screens all day, nuclear weapons, oil dependence, and the soon to be mass die-off of human beings as the oil energy on which our exponential growth is predicated begins to diminish and we overrun our biosphere.

What are you reading the screen with mate?

We've been through this before. The end of oil is not the end of the world. Although we should act fast when it comes to exploiting the vast resources of the Solar System, to make the transition from planetary to interplanetary society less painful.
Oh yeah, we should take with us to other worlds a social system without national, economic or racial boundaries.


Because I hate to see suffering, I hope to god your mathmatical logic is wrong and the rest of the universe was smart enough not to go anywhere near civilization.

The universe does not conform to the expectations of the ignorant.

Zingu
18th December 2004, 05:54
Originally posted by [email protected] 18 2004, 05:45 AM
Zingu, I disagree with your contention that advanced civilisations would ignore primitive ones. This seems to suggest that stone age man was more stupid than modern man, which is not true, he was simply less well informed.
An ant cannot grasp even the basic tenets of a philosophy, or understand a circuit diagram, or write poetry. This is because it is not sentient.

Sentience is the key. With sentience, it does not matter if you have been living in a cave all your life, given enough time you can understand the most advanced concepts that an interstellar civilisation can come up with. I personally do not feel that there is 'another level' of conciousness beyond sentience.



Well, I hope they will leave us alone, think of what the technologically advanced Britain did when it found India.
Maybe among the first civilizations in early times on exploration. But one a civilization enters Type III status, where it is already invinicable from annilation, harnesses the energy of an entire galaxy, can manipulate space-time allowing it, in theory, travel anywhere its wants, will a single planetary type 0 civilization be of any importance?

CorporationsRule
18th December 2004, 07:39
"What are you reading the screen with mate?"

I'm hunched over my computer, which is my point.

You were unable to understand that because you're unable to comprehend the fact that, unlike you, I don't think of myself as the ubermensch

ÑóẊîöʼn
18th December 2004, 07:49
Well, I hope they will leave us alone, think of what the technologically advanced Britain did when it found India.

I don't see why a spacefaring civilisation would need to exploit a primitive one - there are plenty more accessible resources elsewhere and they won't need any labour.
They can either ignore us or speed up our social and technological progress.

ÑóẊîöʼn
18th December 2004, 08:07
You were unable to understand that because you're unable to comprehend the fact that, unlike you, I don't think of myself as the ubermensch

I don't think of myself as an ubermensch. I am a human being.

Commie Rat
18th December 2004, 09:08
Maybe be there are races that ae older but not advanced as us
some that did not get to social equality and end up as a master - slave race there technology would be signifcant ly diminshed wouldn't it

and as we devolped into a agricultur/ industry society maybe they went into a hunter gathere society ?

i dunno thats seem pretty rare that of all the stars that they could search that they would serch that they would search ours?

wat have we got i rekon they would jus pass us by

Zingu
5th January 2005, 01:10
Originally posted by Commie [email protected] 18 2004, 09:08 AM
Maybe be there are races that ae older but not advanced as us
some that did not get to social equality and end up as a master - slave race there technology would be signifcant ly diminshed wouldn't it

and as we devolped into a agricultur/ industry society maybe they went into a hunter gathere society ?

i dunno thats seem pretty rare that of all the stars that they could search that they would serch that they would search ours?

wat have we got i rekon they would jus pass us by
The point is Commierat, once a civilization gains the power to fold space time, they could go anywhere, meaning searching star systems could be a relatively painless process, expect there are so many stars that the arguement can go either way.

Commie Rat
9th January 2005, 23:12
Very Tru Comissar Of Cheese

guerillablack
16th January 2005, 20:34
Explain to me what's too hot and too cold?

Who says that a planet has to have X conditions in order to support life? Didn't they find life in the least likely places here on earth? Some of the hottest and coldest places on the planet?

redstar2000
17th January 2005, 15:29
Originally posted by guerillablack
Explain to me what's too hot and too cold?

Life is just a short word for directed electro-chemical processes which can only take place within a relatively narrow range of temperatures.

The reason humans "freeze to death" is not because they literally freeze but because their internal temperatures fall too low for the electro-chemical reaction that keeps your heart beating to take place (I think it's about 80 degrees F).

At the other end, as temperatures rise, electro-chemical reactions take place faster and faster...until the living organism's "cooling system" breaks down and new (destructive) reactions take over that could not happen at cooler temperatures.

Since life (as we know it) is carbon-based, carbon begins to undergo different kinds of chemical reactions that are destructive to life when temperatures rise past a certain point.

Simple bacteria are the most versatile form of life...some have adapted to temperatures not far below the boiling point of water and others can live at the freezing point of water and even successfully "hibernate" for considerable periods at temperatures well below freezing.

Nevertheless, there are obvious limits...and they are even narrower for large multi-cellular organisms.

This is what is meant when we say a planet is "too hot" or "too cold" for life...the electro-chemical reactions that power carbon-based life can't take place on those planets.

Many otherwise inhospitable planets may still have a "biosphere" -- a small part of the planet where bacteria may flourish (there might well be living bacteria a few feet below the surface of Mars, for example). But a large intelligent form of life can't evolve there...any mutation in that direction would be lethal.

:redstar2000:

The Redstar2000 Papers (http://www.redstar2000papers.fightcapitalism.net)
A site about communist ideas