Log in

View Full Version : Troops grill Rumsfeld over Iraq



Intifada
8th December 2004, 21:18
US Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld faced a grilling when he visited troops about to face combat in Iraq.

Mr Rumsfeld was at Camp Buehring, Kuwait, to deliver a pep-talk to soldiers about the significance of the task ahead of them.

But he faced tough questions from soldiers anxious about their equipment and how long they will stay.

Pentagon staff said troops regularly quiz senior officers, adding that it was a way of boosting morale.

One soldier said troops were forced to root through rubbish to reinforce their armoured vehicles.

"Why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to uparmour our vehicles?" Army Spc Thomas Wilson asked.

His question brought cheers from some 2,000 fellow soldiers - mostly Reserve and National Guard troops - assembled in an aircraft hangar for the question-and-answer session that followed Mr Rumsfeld's speech.

Mr Rumsfeld paused, before asking him to repeat the question, AP news agency reported.

Spc Wilson did so, adding, "we do not have proper armoured vehicles to carry with us".

"You go to war with the army you have," Mr Rumsfeld replied, saying vehicle armour manufacturers were being exhorted to crank up production.

Mr Rumsfeld added that vehicle armour might not provide total protection from the perils faced by soldiers in Iraq - such as roadside bombs.

"You can have all the armour in the world on a tank and it can [still] be blown up," Mr Rumsfeld said.

'Unfair' treatment


The BBC's Nick Childs at the Pentagon says that while questioning at rallies can often be critical, the comments from the troops this time did seem particularly pointed and some of Mr Rumsfeld's responses rather blunt.

Mr Rumsfeld denied the charge from another soldier that active-duty troops were prioritised above Reserve and National Guard soldiers to receive the best military equipment.

Another soldier asked how long the army would continue to use its powers to extend tours of duty - the so-called stop-loss policy which is currently estimated to be keeping some 7,000 soldiers in Iraq beyond their expected return date.

Mr Rumsfeld said this was simply a fact of life for soldiers at time of war.

"It's basically a sound principle, it's nothing new, it's been well understood" by soldiers, he said.

"My guess is it will continue to be used as little as possible, but that it will continue to be used."

At one point Mr Rumsfeld's voice broke as he delivered prepared comments to troops before the question-and-answer session.

"You know there are those who see the violence taking place in Iraq... and they say we can't prevail," he said.

"I see that violence and say we must win," he said.

Pentagon officials are likely to be concerned because the questions were being asked by troops about to head for the front line.

Although the Pentagon insists that troop recruitment and morale remain good overall, the longer the conflict in Iraq goes on, the more difficult an issue that's likely to become, our correspondent notes.

BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4079201.stm)

timbaly
9th December 2004, 00:48
That solider who mentioned lack of armor should have challenged Rumsfeld's response. He should have said that despite it not guaranteeing complete safety that is not good reason for the world's most powerful nation not to equipt its troops with items that could possibly save their lives.

comrade_mufasa
9th December 2004, 01:23
i read that, too. but i dont get what "you go to war with the army you have" means. I would like to see the army go on strike becouse of something that is a needed tool for the military. this goverment really dosn't care about its people.

Intifada
9th December 2004, 10:02
It seemed as if Rummy couldn't care less about the problems which US troops are facing.

Osman Ghazi
9th December 2004, 10:45
Seemed? No, I think that's an exact summation of the situation.

Non-Sectarian Bastard!
9th December 2004, 17:18
Who cares?

One fucktard aks the master fucktard why he doesn't get more armor, so he could be more efficient in killing and you all start cheering. :angry:

comrade_mufasa
9th December 2004, 18:24
Originally posted by Non-Sectarian Bastard!@Dec 9 2004, 12:18 PM
Who cares?

One fucktard aks the master fucktard why he doesn't get more armor, so he could be more efficient in killing and you all start cheering. :angry:
its not that we want the soldier to keep killing. its that this regime dosnt even care about the soldiers so what does that tell you about how much they care about the rest of us.

Latifa
9th December 2004, 19:18
Originally posted by [email protected] 9 2004, 12:48 AM
That solider who mentioned lack of armor should have challenged Rumsfeld's response. He should have said that despite it not guaranteeing complete safety that is not good reason for the world's most powerful nation not to equipt its troops with items that could possibly save their lives.
The man was just another retarded soldier type. He had the question written down on a sheet of paper, and even if he did think of an answer off the fly he would not have had it in time. It wasn't a debate situation.