View Full Version : More Accusations
Paradox
19th November 2004, 04:24
So who's tired of hearing accusations against Iran? Well, in case you've haven't heard, they've made new accusations. From what I heard on tv, there's supposedly a nuclear plant near Tehran. I was just talking about this with my father, and he said that they might make some strategic strikes on Iran's facilities. The troops are overextended, so they can't just invade Iran right now. But, soon as they can, they probably will. After all, Iran is part of the "axis of evil." Putin also announced plans for new nuclear missile systems, which amerikkka said didn't worry them. No surprise there. We can have these weapons to defend ourselves, but Iran!?! Their terrorists! So what if we use depleated uranium in our ammunition; so what if it's hazardous to people's health, including our own soldiers; we're fighting for "freedom." ;) I swear, the hypocrisy of these idiots makes me sick! Only we can defend ourselves, no one else! These people disgust me.
h&s
19th November 2004, 08:39
Somehow I doubt that any of these allegations against Iran are true. The Americns just keep making vague and false claims against Tehran to cary on 'reminding' its people about the axis of evil to constatnly keep the 'war on terror' idea in their heads. That way there is less opposition to what they do in Iraq and Afghanistan.
If the allegations about the nuclear plant are true, there's no way in my opinion that America would launch a strike (they don't want open war with Tehran -not yet anyway) they would get Israel to do the dirty work for them.
refuse_resist
19th November 2004, 12:45
Just more propaganda is all. As long as they are making someone or something seem very bad or evil, they'll use it as some sort of reason to justify action towards them while people will agree with it and follow blindly like sheep.
Paradox
20th November 2004, 04:17
Well, earlier today on fox news (of course) they had a guest who said the only real option amerika has is to make a regime change, like they're doing with Iraq. I forget who the guy was, but he said amerika should "help" the Iranian people accomplish this. He said that he believes the Iranian people want the regime change just as much as the amerikans, if not more so. Yeah, like the Iranian people are going to trust the amerikans after the shah. As h&s said, they just keep making vague, unverified claims against Iran. u.$. officials claim that Iran is 3 to 5 years from making a nuclear weapon, if they're successful in enriching uranium, as they claim Iran is doing. And I think I remember hearing that guy on fox call Iran fascist. So, as soon as they can manage to, I think it's safe to say Iran is their next target. Yup, they want to "liberate" them too. I hope people don't buy these lies, and question the authenticity of these claims. But then again, people think we're liberating Iraq, even though the original case for invasion was saddam's WMDs. And we all know how that turned out, and where he got those weapons he used against Iran, and later his own people, in the first place.
KrazyRabidSheep
20th November 2004, 13:32
And I think I remember hearing that guy on fox call Iran fascist. So, as soon as they can manage to, I think it's safe to say Iran is their next target. Yup, they want to "liberate" them too.
That would be kinda out of charecter, for the most part the U.S. has liked fascists because fascists hate communists (whilst communists strive for the rights, wellbeing and freedoms of the individual, fascists stand for a centralized autocratic government, limiting the power of the individual in favour of the "party".)
It is much easier to control a fascist state then others simply becasue you have to control only one person (whoever the dictator is).
The U.S. had little intrest in a war with Hitler until the war in the Pacific was started, and Germany declared war with the U.S.
The only fascists that come to mind that the U.S. didn't really care about were Juan and Evita en Isabel Peron.
Americans do not know what fascist really are. Americans use the term facist as "one who does not agree with me."
So fascist is used to discredit political rivals whilst the real fascist are ignored and labels less abusive terms that the average person dose not understand
komon
22nd November 2004, 21:26
divide and rule ,nothing new under fascism
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.