Log in

View Full Version : THE SPANISH CGT - The New Anarcho-syndicalism



PRC-UTE
13th November 2004, 18:50
THE SPANISH CGT - The New Anarcho-syndicalism (http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=04/11/11/9459137)

by Larry Gambone

I was well received by the International Relations representative of the CGT, (Confederacion General de Trabajo) Angel Bosqued. At first he thought I might be a member of NEFAC as they had recently done a tour of Europe, but I explained that I was only representing myself. We talked for about an hour and I learned a great deal about the history and practices of the CGT. I told him that people in the English-speaking world know almost nothing about contemporary Spanish anarcho-syndicalism and I, in my small way, would do what ever was possible to change that situation. He gave me a pile of CGT literature and took me on a tour of the Barcelona CGT headquarters.

The headquarters was very impressive, consisting of the top floors of a ten or eleven story building. Each of the individual industrial unions, such as teachers, metal workers or communications workers, has its own office. There are several larger meeting rooms, offices of the Salvador Segui Foundation (a CGT cultural grouping) and a bar-cafeteria with a tiled outdoor lounging area. This has a wonderful view of Barcelona as it is on the ninth floor. Next we went to the archives and library that comprised much of the tenth floor. The library alone consists of some 10,000 volumes on anarchism, syndicalism and related topics.

Now the CGT is not some tiny anarchist sect with a dozen members, but is the representative of some one million workers. The Confederation is found in every corner of Spain, and is in fact, the third largest trade union grouping, only exceeded by the Socialist UGT and the Communist CCOO. The CGT is strong among bank workers, television, postal and hotel workers, but also has support among teachers, chemical workers, graphic artists, and cleaning workers.

The Confederation is composed of two basic structures, geographical and industrial. At the base lies the local union which is autonomous. Where there are 75 or more members in a vicinity they can form a union local which is open to all trades. Locals federate together at the city level, or where the city is very large, at the district level. These in turn, federate at the provincial level. The provincial federations confederate at the territorial level, Spain being made up of Catalunia, Euskadi, Astrurias, Castile, etc. All of these form the national confederation.


When enough members are organized in an industry they can form an industrial branch. These industrial branches federate, for example bank workers have a federation for each of the major banks. The next level, is like a regular industrial union. For example, bank workers belong to the Federation of Bank, Credit and Office Workers. The territorial confederation and the industrial union federations form a Confederal Commitee. There is an annual general meeting of the CGT as well. It must be emphasized that the union operates from the bottom-up and members are not controlled by the confederal level.


How does the CGT differ from the usual far-left groupings and regular trade unions? First of all, they do not think they have all the answers, or the answers they do have are written in stone for all eternity. As they state in their Agenda Confederal 2004, "Anarchism is not a closed or final doctrine, it expresses ideas that could appear contradictory; radical pacifism, or the justification of violent acts as social protest, extreme individualism and membership in syndicalist unions, absolute rejection of institutions and limited participation in them. Anarchism is characterized by its confidence in individual liberty and in the capacity to judge and act..."

Rather than forcing dogmas down people's throats they actually listen to working people and the union gives workers what they want, not what intellectuals think they ought to want. I think much of the CGT's success is to be found here. Their direct-democratic structure allows the membership and not bureaucrats to control the union. While not pushing dogmas, they promote a vision of society, an anarchist ethical encompassing individual liberty, autonomy, direct action, self-management and federalism. The union attempts as much as possible in daily life to live by this vision.

While highly critical of all forms of authoritarianism, they do not spend their energy attacking other radical groups. The CGT is a militant union, but you never see the sort of rhetorical radicalism - violent images or shouting about class war - in their press. They eagerly work with other unions which in some manner share their attitudes, attempting to create a global movement of "alternative unionism" and have strong relations with other anarcho-syndicalists such as the Italian USI, the Swedish SAC, and the French CNT-F.

The CGT does not regard itself, or even the working class, as the whole struggle, seeing their union as one part of a broad movement comprising peasant unions, ecologists, cooperatives, women's and community groups. They have good relations with the Zapatistas in Mexico and consider their union to be a member of the Anti-globalisation Movement. "The CGT is an anarcho-syndicalist organization... which acts in the working world. But not all the problems are just in this area, nor are workers unaware of this fact. Thus, syndicalists, anti-authoritarians, pacifists, immigrants, ecologists, movements against sexism and the Anti-Globalisation Movement are in the end one movement, one without `professional revolutionaries' in charge and with the consciousness that the transformation will involve all groups."

The CGT spends much time attacking the wave of so-called privatizations going on in Spain and everywhere else. Many union members are government or social service workers. However, while defending social services and public workers, they do not defend the state or merely tail the statist left. The state is clearly seen as the enemy along with corporate capitalism and the vision of self-management and decentralization is offered as an alternative. Once again in the Agenda Confederal, "Self-management combined with direct democracy, mutual aid and solidarity present the complete and total alternative to the pyramidal, hierarchical, authoritarian and exploitative model of capitalist society incarnated in neoliberal ideology."

A narrow anti-political ideology they consider divisive. Many union members belong to, or vote for political parties, yet in practice are good syndicalists. But at the same time, the CGT never fails to point out the problems inherent in parliamentary politics and parties. Nor does the union have any time for nationalism but the autonomy of union branches and decentralization allows historically oppressed peoples such as the Basques and Catalonians to have their own language publications and federations.

The CGT's success will hopefully rub off on other syndicalists. Already in France the CNT-F has experienced a surge in support, with some 5000 members, compared with a few hundred a decade ago. Syndicalist groups have appeared in the former Stalinist countries, and although small, may experience growth. Orthodox unionism has crumbled in the face of neoconservatism and maybe workers are open to the ideas of autonomous direct action. And since nothing exists in isolation, a rebirth of anarcho-syndicalism will only benefit anarchists of all varieties.




Link: http://www.cgt.es

Non-Sectarian Bastard!
13th November 2004, 19:51
Damn the non-english anarcho-syndicallist Spanish sites. Same with the CNT site.

But what's the difference between this one and the CNT?

redstar2000
14th November 2004, 03:14
Excellent post! :D

Now, do they have a message board? In multiple languages?

They should!

:redstar2000:

The Redstar2000 Papers (http://www.redstar2000papers.fightcapitalism.net)
A site about communist ideas

1949
14th November 2004, 03:22
The CGT does not regard itself, or even the working class, as the whole struggle, seeing their union as one part of a broad movement comprising peasant unions,
I didn't realize there were peasants in Spain. I assumed Spain was a developed capitalist nation with an agricultural proletariat.

Red Heretic
14th November 2004, 23:44
Originally posted by Non-Sectarian Bastard!@Nov 13 2004, 07:51 PM
Damn the non-english anarcho-syndicallist Spanish sites. Same with the CNT site.

But what's the difference between this one and the CNT?
The CGT and the CNT have the exact same politics with the exception of one aspect. The CGT has candidates in the elections, while the CNT refuses to participate. Admitting anarcho-syndicalist candidates into the elections for propagandistic reasons has made the CGT about 6 times larger than the CNT, and has actually proven benficial, which shows a break off from some of the more dogmatic anarchist theory.

Red Heretic
14th November 2004, 23:45
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 03:22 AM
I didn't realize there were peasants in Spain. I assumed Spain was a developed capitalist nation with an agricultural proletariat.
What's the difference?

The Garbage Disposal Unit
15th November 2004, 03:40
A peasant owns their land/means of production - they are small producers, who neither employ nor are employed. Individualist-Anarchists everywhere idolize, and wish to make love to them.
An agricultural-proletarian does not own the means of agricultural production - they work the land for an owner. If I work for a big nasty agricorp, and harvest beets or tobacco for a wage, I'm agricultural proletariat as fuck.

redstar2000
16th November 2004, 03:08
Originally posted by makhno
The CGT and the CNT have the exact same politics with the exception of one aspect. The CGT has candidates in the elections, while the CNT refuses to participate. Admitting anarcho-syndicalist candidates into the elections for propagandistic reasons has made the CGT about 6 times larger than the CNT, and has actually proven beneficial, which shows a break off from some of the more dogmatic anarchist theory.

That sounds implausible.

If the CGT and the CNT have "the exact same politics", then it doesn't make sense that one would run candidates in bourgeois elections and the other would not.

Clearly there must be some important political differences that are, perhaps, "beneath the surface".

Just as a guess, perhaps the CGT is better at class struggle than the old CNT...and workers see that.

:redstar2000:

The Redstar2000 Papers (http://www.redstar2000papers.fightcapitalism.net)
A site about communist ideas

PRC-UTE
16th November 2004, 04:19
I'm wondering if there isn't a lot of baggage with the CNT whereas the CGT is making a fresh start. I for one wouldn't want to be associated with the CNT given their track record of selling out their best militants to appease liberals.

Red Heretic
16th November 2004, 05:00
Originally posted by redstar2000+Nov 16 2004, 03:08 AM--> (redstar2000 @ Nov 16 2004, 03:08 AM)
makhno
The CGT and the CNT have the exact same politics with the exception of one aspect. The CGT has candidates in the elections, while the CNT refuses to participate. Admitting anarcho-syndicalist candidates into the elections for propagandistic reasons has made the CGT about 6 times larger than the CNT, and has actually proven beneficial, which shows a break off from some of the more dogmatic anarchist theory.

That sounds implausible.

If the CGT and the CNT have "the exact same politics", then it doesn't make sense that one would run candidates in bourgeois elections and the other would not.

Clearly there must be some important political differences that are, perhaps, "beneath the surface".

Just as a guess, perhaps the CGT is better at class struggle than the old CNT...and workers see that.

:redstar2000:

The Redstar2000 Papers (http://www.redstar2000papers.fightcapitalism.net)
A site about communist ideas [/b]
I said with the exception man... don't pick at my words. I have talked to many Spanish workers, all of which have told me that that is the only serious ideological difference, but that at this point the CNT is dormant becuase of it's low membership, while the CGT its active and powerful, attracting more workers.

The CGT became this powerful through usage of the bourgeois elections, while the CNT bickered over it.

redstar2000
17th November 2004, 04:55
Originally posted by makhno
...but that at this point the CNT is dormant because of its low membership, while the CGT is active and powerful, attracting more workers.

Well, there's an explanation right there...an active union is going to attract members; a dormant one will have difficulties.


The CGT became this powerful through usage of the bourgeois elections, while the CNT bickered over it.

I wasn't trying to "pick at your words" but you have just said something that is plainly impossible.

I readily admit ignorance of the details of Spanish politics, but there's no country where 2 + 2 = 5 or where workers join a union "because" it runs candidates in bourgeois elections.

Moreover, running candidates in bourgeois elections makes no sense from an anarcho-syndicalist standpoint.

Why in the world would they want to do such a thing?

:redstar2000:

The Redstar2000 Papers (http://www.redstar2000papers.fightcapitalism.net)
A site about communist ideas

Blackberry
17th November 2004, 07:02
The claim by Larry Gambone that the CGT is an "anarcho-syndicalist union" is misleading. The fact is that it is made up of many different members of differing ideologies, and there is a continual struggle for "power" within it.

(The CNT was very much the same. There was a power struggle up to and including 1936. The FAI was created by anarchists to help them in their own struggle for "power" within the CNT.)

Lambone's claim that the CGT represents 1 million workers can be somewhat misleading as he did not put that number in context. The CGT is said to contain some 50,000 paying members, while it is the "representative of 1 million workers" due to its participation in some sort of "enterprise committees" election (they received 1 million votes and thus have a proportionate number of representatives based on percentage) which is some sort of company meant to represent labor-management relations (the details on what this could be are fuzzy, but not well spoken of by one CNT Madrid member).

Of course, there is no use championing the CGT over the CNT because of their "bickering and refusal to participate in enterprise committee elections". We know very well that those who participate in elections to "represent" people in capitalist societies are going to fair well than their similar counterparts who refuse to do so. Those who refuse to do so, such as the CNT, are up against the dominant culture of our time, and thus find it harder to build upon what they have. "Makhno's" championing of the CGT is, of course, ideological on his part. I would imagine that not too many anarchists would want to gloat about the CGT's work in such elections, and that it was "beneficial", seeing now as the CGT is now attracting reformists to its ranks.

(For those interested to know, the CNT has between 5000 and 10,000 members. They failed to have reimbursed most of the assets that were stolen from them by Franco's regime. The CNT member from Madrid who posted on Infoshop claims they are effective in the struggles they take upon themselves, despite their size. They are hardly dormant.)

Here is an interesting discussion where I base quite a bit of my information from: http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?...459137#comments (http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=04/11/11/9459137#comments)