View Full Version : Communism And Anarchism
RABBIT - THE - CUBAN - MILITANT
7th October 2004, 23:38
Why do you think that anarchists and communists get along so well . I personally have no anarchist friends so I was wondering why 2 opposing ideologies are able to co exist in the same environments like the community that we have here? Post your oppinons
redstar2000
7th October 2004, 23:54
This might help explain things a bit...
The Convergence of Marxist and Anarchist Theory, what do you think about this? (http://www.che-lives.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=28799)
:redstar2000:
The Redstar2000 Papers (http://www.redstar2000papers.fightcapitalism.net)
A site about communist ideas
Major. Rudiger
8th October 2004, 00:18
I tell you my little grasshopper....
well the only way to get communism is so the socitey around you goes into anarchy. Then its your duty to start a farm, base, hippie farm, what ever you want to call it. No one well be making money becasue first theres no currency anymore and second they'res no point for currency in anarchy or comunism. know you have a communsim state in a anrachy state.
i dont know if thats going to make sense or not but you understand it in like a year.
LSD
8th October 2004, 00:41
well the only way to get communism is so the socitey around you goes into anarchy. Then its your duty to start a farm, base, hippie farm, what ever you want to call it. No one well be making money becasue first theres no currency anymore and second they'res no point for currency in anarchy or comunism. know you have a communsim state in a anrachy state.
You appear to be confusing anarchism with anarchy.
I would suggest you research what anarchism actually is.
i dont know if thats going to make sense or not but you understand it in like a year.
What precisely happens in a year?
RABBIT - THE - CUBAN - MILITANT
8th October 2004, 01:01
What I truly don’t understand is why the leading political view of the left can be comfortable with probably the most right wing ideology ( even though it is not “right wing “ in the traditional sense) and vice versa.
RABBIT - THE - CUBAN - MILITANT
8th October 2004, 01:24
Originally posted by RABBIT - THE - CUBAN -
[email protected] 8 2004, 12:01 AM
What I truly don’t understand is why the leading political view of the left can be comfortable with probably the most right wing ideology ( even though it is not “right wing “ in the traditional sense) and vice versa.
That didn’t come out the way I meant it ... I' want to know if any one who’s either a communist or anarchist agrees with the others ideals or are just Comrades because of both our goals do destroy imperialism and crush fascism and why
STI
8th October 2004, 01:56
Communism and Anarchism are, in themselves, not all that "different" (so long as we're not talking about Leninism et al.)
Classless, Stateless society.
apathy maybe
8th October 2004, 06:08
I would say that communism is basically a subset of anarchy. It is not completely compatible. The major difference is that generally people who call themselves communists call themselves Marxists as well. But both want a stateless, classless society.
Guest1
8th October 2004, 08:05
Originally posted by
[email protected] 7 2004, 08:56 PM
Communism and Anarchism are, in themselves, not all that "different" (so long as we're not talking about Leninism et al.)
Classless, Stateless society.
Even Leninists agree that the end result of Marxism is stateless, classless society. The only meaningful differences between most Marxists and Anarchists center around how to get there.
sanpal
8th October 2004, 08:55
Under anarchism and communism it is meant the classless and stateless society. In that case no matter how you name this kind of society, as communism, anarchism, abracadabraism, blahblahism or something else, the thing is not changed. So I see no reason to change the scientific name of this kind of society - communism.
If to look from another side in the anarchist society the freedom is
proclaimed as full freedom for individuum except the actions which restrain
interests of others. It is as a high goal.
In communist society, as I understand it, the freedom is interpreted as deliberate necessity.It means that every individuum sees himself as an
indissoluble part of the collective (the commune). He/she understands that
doing good for others is doing good for him/her-self.
In the same time such relations could work perfectly in micro-collectives but modern industrial production is unpossible without a complex structure of administration, etc. Such kind of problems must be solved in limits of self-government of communist society, i.e. without violation of main principles of communist relations. It'll be need in the higher level of consciousness of people and (it's important) the clear and understandable system of showing up the necessity of population, stock-taking and distribution of ware.
If anarchists want the same what to use the term of "anarchism" for?
More popular? :lol:
IMO the communist society will be more complicated than capitalist one.
Guest1
8th October 2004, 09:39
Once again, Anarchists don't believe in the transitional state, that is all.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.