Log in

View Full Version : Russian School Siege Bears Hallmarks of Potential



Skeptic
6th September 2004, 20:54
Russian School Siege Bears Hallmarks of Potential Staged Psy-Op

Paul Joseph Watson | September 5 2004

The murky events of the school siege in which hundreds of children were killed are raising disturbing questions as to which entities were actually behind the co-ordination of the attack. Subsequent developments will bring a clearer picture but many indicators point to this event being a staged psy-op.

Most prominent terror incidents over the past twenty years have been state sponsored. That is not to say that the incident in North Ossetia hasn't been a harrowing experience for the victims involved. For them, the events were all too real.

The wave of terror began when two Tupolev passenger airliners crashed within minutes of each other on the night of August 26th.

The election of the Chechen president which took place two days later saw the Kremlin's choice overwhelmingly win with a landslide. The London Guardian called it a 'farcical election'.

The Russians were the only ones to benefit from the plane crashes.

The independent Russian media, what's left of it after years of brutal crackdown, are saying that the planes were not hijacked and bombed by terrorists on board, but that the Russian air defenses purposefully shot down the airliners to then blame the Chechens. The fact that the aircraft wreckage was strewn across a large area supports the shoot down theory more so than the contention that a small shoe bomb was detonated on board.

The past track record of the FSB, the former KGB also lends credence to this contention.

There is a sub-section on Prison Planet.com within the 9/11 archive which details how the apartment bombings of the late 90’s which were blamed on the Chechens, were actually carried out by the Russian FSB. A particular example was in a place called Ryazan, where people witnessed FSB agents planting hexogen explosives, the same explosives we’re told were used to bring this plane down. The first call the 'terrorists' placed was traced to the highest office of the FSB and they were allowed to leave the country.

Whether these planes were taken down by missiles or hexogen explosives, the culprits are still unknown and I firmly believe that we’ll see yet more evidence emerge that this was a staged action, albeit sloppily carried out, as was the March train bombing in Madrid, Spain.

Furthermore, we're now told now that the black boxes were found and that they indicate the pilots tried to save the plane after the explosion had taken place. But initially they said the black boxes hadn’t recorded anything, but now suddenly, after they had blamed the Chechens, they miraculously fix themselves.

In the case of the school siege, one would expect the terrorists' identity to be clear and their demands clearly understood. In this instance, the opposite is the case as a result of a conscious effort by the Russian government to cover-up the true identity and motive of the terrorists.

Any real terrorist organization would claim responsibility for an event almost immediately. Chechen separatist leaders have stated that the Chechens had nothing to do with the plane crashes or the school siege.

The Russian government took the action of blocking all telephone communications in Beslan, supposedly to prevent the terrorists from communicating with outside organizers who were not at the scene of the events. However, if the terrorists had planned to do this, wouldn't they just use radio communications or satellite phones?

The videotape that the hostage-takers gave to the Russian authorities was blank. Why would a tape supposedly containing the demands of the terrorists be blank unless it was deliberately erased by the Russians?

Akhmed Zakayev, a special envoy to Chechen separatist leader Aslan Maskhadov, told the Caucasus Times newspaper, "a third force that brought Russian President Vladimir Putin to power” is behind all the terrorist attacks committed in Russia over the past two weeks.

For weeks myself and Alex Jones stated many times on Alex's radio show that we would probably see a major terrorist incident abroad during the Republican National Convention.

In a sick twist of fate, Bush re-election campaign commericials have been running for weeks where Bush makes reference of a mother being forced to choose between which child she wants to pick up from school in the event of a terrorist attack.

Similar stories have been carried by US news networks related to the school siege in Russia.

Was this merely a coincidence or a carefully crafted brainwashing technique. If it is deliberate then Bush and the people who control him had advanced knowledge of the school siege.

Click here to watch the Bush commercial.

There are several other contradictions to the story that haven't been resolved. Exactly how many of the terrorists escaped and where are they now?

Were FSB agents involved in gunning down any of the victims when the building was stormed?

We will continue to track the fallout of this story as more develops.

---------------------------

E mail your comment on this article to [email protected] and have it posted here.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/s...050904psyop.htm (http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/september2004/050904psyop.htm)

commiecrusader
6th September 2004, 23:05
this is an interesting idea but there are several problems.


The Russian government took the action of blocking all telephone communications in Beslan, supposedly to prevent the terrorists from communicating with outside organizers who were not at the scene of the events. However, if the terrorists had planned to do this, wouldn't they just use radio communications or satellite phones?
it is not uncommon, especially in MEDCs for terrorist organisations to use mobile phones to communicate. they are small and quick to use. it is also harder for conversations to be monitored, and harder to pinpoint where the phonecalls are being made from and to, since they can only be located in a phone mast's zone, and not the location of a sattelite signal or landline. furthermore, it is much easier to pick out a radio or satellite phone signal than a mobile phone signal, due to the relative rarity of the former.


The videotape that the hostage-takers gave to the Russian authorities was blank. Why would a tape supposedly containing the demands of the terrorists be blank unless it was deliberately erased by the Russians?
there is any number of reasons as to why the tape was blank. been to close to something magnetic? damaged during the attack? disorganisation on the part of the terrorists?

Sovietsky Souyuz
7th September 2004, 13:45
i seriously find it hard to believe that the russian government actually ordered the murder of all those children, and then managed to so carefully choriograph the whole event for world wide media benefit .

the russians are incompetent at controlling these situations, they managed to get the red army beaten in afghanistan , and cant even solve their problems in chechnya, in my opinion this is just more childish conspiracy theory crap made simply to get attention and notoriety for its author.

and with reference to the two aircraft , wreckage couldnt have been cause to be scattered unless it was shot at by air defence ? silly person whoever wrote that, what do you think happens to an airplane when its fuel catches fire ? yes, you guessed it. BOOM, and a small show bomb is perfectly capable of causing enough distress to an airframe to cause an explosion

h&s
7th September 2004, 15:03
I certainly think the Russian government want these thype of attacks to happen to consolidate their power and to ain support for their policies, but only in the way Bush administration needed 11.9.01 to carry out their PNAC plan. Any allegations that it was done by the government are just crazy, completly un-credible conspiracy theories.

kami888
11th September 2004, 11:45
IMO, the author is a bad ass idiot. Governemnt never ordered to storm the building and long time before the fight began, the officials have said that they would never storm anything. Whatever was on the tape, i would no want to see it anyway. Just recently the chchen terrorists announced that they fight for, and they will destroy "The heretic country called Russia".

The reason for so heavy casualties is the extreme inexperience and super bad condition of russian armed forces.

However, don't mention afganistan here plz.
If you say that the Red Army was BEATEN in Afganistan, same way I can say that the U.S. army was BEATEN in vietnam. But we all know that both of these statements are wrong. It was just a matter of time needed for the Russians to stabalize the situation in Afganistan, same way i believe if U.S. kept fighting in Vietnam, sooner or later they would have conquered it.

Though, I too have to agree that these kinds of attacks help the governent to further centralize power, but it is just crazy to think that the attack was planned by the government officials.

Sovietsky Souyuz
13th September 2004, 08:16
the US army was being systematically destroyed in vietnam ? how many years had they been in the jungles.............fighting poorly armed rebels....and loosing hundred of soldiers each month to combat and all kinds of interesting diseases.

and i apologise for being such a heathen. i shall never ever badmouth the red army again. of course it was a matter of time, they didnt leave in the face of mounting losses and opposition that was being american and british trained (and armed) . i shall repent, for i have sinned <bows> long live mother russia <cue sarcastic grin>

Valkyrie
13th September 2004, 18:41
The problem with conspiracy theorists is that they not only tell us their theories but they premise how we are supposed to compartmentalize them. They do this because they think their audience are idiotically receptive to suggestion and dysfunctional in forming logical conclusions, so hey.. they&#39;ll do it for us, because, we are a bunch of assholes.

I tend to think the guy who wrote this piece shot down the plane and took the school hostage so he&#39;d have some conspiracy to expound upon.

For me to read without any kind of gullibility, he would have had to stop writing here.....


Furthermore, we&#39;re now told now that the black boxes were found and that they indicate the pilots tried to save the plane after the explosion had taken place. But initially they said the black boxes hadn’t recorded anything, (HERE )but now suddenly, after they had blamed the Chechens, they miraculously fix themselves.


In the case of the school siege, one would expect the terrorists&#39; identity to be clear and their demands clearly understood. In this instance, the opposite is the case (HERE) as a result of a conscious effort by the Russian government to cover-up the true identity and motive of the terrorists.


(HERE) Any real terrorist organization would claim responsibility for an event almost immediately. Chechen separatist leaders have stated that the Chechens had nothing to do with the plane crashes or the school siege.


The Russian government took the action of blocking all telephone communications in Beslan, supposedly to prevent the terrorists from communicating with outside organizers who were not at the scene of the events. (HERE) However, if the terrorists had planned to do this, wouldn&#39;t they just use radio communications or satellite phones?


The videotape that the hostage-takers gave to the Russian authorities was blank. (HERE) Why would a tape supposedly containing the demands of the terrorists be blank unless it was deliberately erased by the Russians?


(HERE)Was this merely a coincidence or a carefully crafted brainwashing technique. If it is deliberate then Bush and the people who control him had advanced knowledge of the school siege



Where is the Bush commerical?.. I&#39;ve gotta see that.

Guerrilla22
13th September 2004, 22:49
The person who wrote this article ranks right up there with those conspiracy theorist, who claim that the CIA ordered the 9-11 attacks, it&#39;s ridiculous. No government would kill hundreds of children fo purposes of justifying the occupation of Chechenya, especially after they already carry out operations against the Chechens.

KickMcCann
14th September 2004, 03:49
Guerrilla22,

I disagree. In the 1960&#39;s the CIA had well organized plans to conduct terrorist operations against american cities and civilians then blame it on Cuba, just so they could go to war with Cuba. If the US would do it, why not Putin&#39;s Russia?