NEWS FLASH!!!

[Rasta Sapian]

vote kerry, or subject yourselves to a bankrupted nation, full of fat cat, oil drinking beurocrats, feeding off the lower and middle classes.

its time to push the bush to the curb, with all of the other unemployed american people who deserve a better future!

[Y2A]

Indeed. Getting rid of the 200,000K+ income tax cut will be a great way to help reduce the deficit. But I fail to see how we can do this, while at the same time pledging billions to better health insureance, and other programs, without raising taxes for everyone else.

[Guest1]

A vote for Kerry is a vote for the status-quo.

Stop kidding yourself.

[Solzhenitsyn]

Originally posted by [email protected] 20 2004, 10:43 PM
Indeed. Getting rid of the 200,000K+ income tax cut will be a great way to help reduce the deficit. But I fail to see how we can do this, while at the same time pledging billions to better health insureance, and other programs, without raising taxes for everyone else.
Ever heard of the Laffer curve?

[Ortega]

Why not vote Kerry? He might only be "Bush Lite", but at least he's "lite"! At least he'll bring some change!

[Guest1]

The point is, he won't. He's even more of a waste of time than the usual clap-trap the second side of the coin offers up every four years. He doesn't even try to look like a reasonable alternative anymore. It's disgusting.

George Bush recently asked "I want to know if, knowing what he knows now, John Kerry would have still voted for the war on Iraq". Simple answer right? Here's a chance for Kerry, who did vote for it, to redeem himself and demonstrate that he is a progeressive alternative! His answer? "I would have definitely still voted for war powers". What the fuck is that? What happened to all the anti-war sentiment that he's supposedly riding on?

Oh, but maybe he'll be better at foreign policy in different areas, right? Wrong. Asked about Hugo Chavez, Kerry described him as a serious threat to world stability that must be "dealt with". He spoke of sanctions and he spoke of paying and training the opposition.

Well, what about domestic policy you say? Surely he's going to provide health-care, education and all of these things with more funding and cut the military, right? Kerry has promised alot of things. So many meaningless things in fact, that it's hard to imagine any of them being implemented, except for one promise. Under Kerry, the army will in fact grow from George Bush. He has promised expansions. As for healthcare and the like, universal free healthcare is very simple. It really is not complicated. Instead you get "medicaid for seniors" that makes 60 year olds jump through hoops to get their perscriptions.

So fuck Kerry. Stop choosing between Kudos or Kang, and take your destiny into your own hands! Revolution is the only answer!

[Vinny Rafarino]

Originally posted by Jacobo [email protected] 23 2004, 12:36 AM
Why not vote Kerry? He might only be "Bush Lite", but at least he's "lite"! At least he'll bring some change!
Change for whom?

What kind of "change"?

You cats will never get it.

[Rasta Sapian]

push the bush.........................

help save democracy and vote Kerry!

[BOZG]

Originally posted by Rasta [email protected] 23 2004, 05:24 PM
push the bush.........................

help save democracy and vote Kerry!
And how exactly will Kerry save democracy?

[Capitalist Imperial]

"A dying America"

LOL, geez, get serious.

[Ortega]

At least Kerry will lift the travel embargo on Cuba...

...but only the travel embargo.

What I would do for a third party that was actually different from the existing major two, and actually had some shot at putting a candidate or two in office.

Revolution is unrealistic. But so is change in this two-party system.

Hard to say what to do. If more Americans were politically involved, if a third party worked hard to "get out the word", who knows, maybe that party could actually make a difference. Maybe that party could get some votes.

[CanadianCommie]

Originally posted by Jacobo [email protected] 25 2004, 02:52 AM
What I would do for a third party that was actually different from the existing major two, and actually had some shot at putting a candidate or two in office.

...
...

Hard to say what to do. If more Americans were politically involved, if a third party worked hard to "get out the word", who knows, maybe that party could actually make a difference. Maybe that party could get some votes.
I think its called the Green party. ;)

The Green party while it may not win this election is trying to do what your saying and they are very different from the Republicans and Democrats

[Y2A]

Nader is a fool. I like the guy, and want to see him in office, but the way he's going about things are illogical, He should run for the Senate, he'd have a much better chance of winning and be able to make some real changes.