Log in

View Full Version : Bush Rallies Behind Columbian President



Skeptic
4th August 2004, 01:41
Bush Administration Rallies Behind Colombian President

Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON, Aug 2 (IPS) - The administration of President George W Bush on Monday rallied behind Colombian President Alvaro Uribe in the face of allegations contained in a 13-year-old Pentagon intelligence report that he was a ''close personal friend'' of drug lord Pablo Escobar and had worked for his Medellin drug cartel.

''We completely disavow these allegations about President Uribe'', said State Department spokesman Adam Ereli. ''We have no credible information that substantiates or corroborates these allegations that appeared in an unevaluated 1991 report, linking President Uribe to the narcotics business or trafficking''.

''What I can tell you is that this was a report that included information that was based on input from an uncorroborated source'', said State Department spokesman Adam Ereli. ''It is raw information ... (not) finely evaluated intelligence, and my understanding from my Department of Defence (DOD) colleagues is that it did not constitute an official DIA (Defence Intelligence Agency) or DOD position''.

The document, which was released last weekend by the independent National Security Archive (NSA) at George Washington University under the Freedom of Information Act, consists of a list and brief profiles of 104 of the ''more important Colombian narco-terrorists contracted by the Colombian narcotic cartels for security, transportation, distribution, collection and enforcement of narcotics operations in both the U.S. and Colombia''.

It also includes a warning at the top that not all of the intelligence has been ''finally evaluated".

Uribe is listed as number 82, just after Pablo Escobar, ''maximum chief of the Medellin cartel'', Yair Klein, a retired Israeli Army colonel and mercenary who helped train cartel paramilitary forces, and Berta Inez, described as a ''direct collaborator with Escobar'', who was killed in a shoot-out with Colombian national police (backed up by U.S. intelligence and special forces) in 1993.

''Alvaro Uribe Velez'', according to the document, is a ''Colombian politician and senator dedicated to collaboration with the Medellin cartel at high government levels. Uribe was linked to a business involved in narcotics activities in the U.S. His father was murdered in Colombia for his connection with the narcotic traffickers."

''Uribe has worked for the Medellin cartel and is a close personal friend of Pablo Escobar Gaviria'', the document went on. ''He has participated in Escobar's political campaign to win the position of assistant parliamentarian to Jorge (Ortega). Uribe has been one of the politicians, from the Senate, who has attacked all forms of the extradition treaty''.

While Uribe has staunchly denied any connection to drug trafficking -- as he did again in a strong statement Sunday that was also published on the NSA website -- some of the allegations contained in the profile have been raised in the past, notably by his political foes in the 2002 presidential elections.

''It's something the left has been trying to pin on him for a while, and this gives them new ammunition'', said Adam Isaacson, a Colombia specialist with the Centre for International Policy (CIP), a Washington-based centre-left think tank.

But Isaacson himself said no solid connections between Uribe and Escobar have ever been solidly established, and that the newly released document, which was fraught with factual errors, was unlikely to change many minds. He pointed in particular to the inclusion on the list of Adnan Khashoggi, a well-known Saudi arms dealer, as well as Carlos Vives, a Grammy-winning pop star, as likely mistakes.

U.S. counter-drug and counter-insurgency assistance to Colombia has increased during the Bush administration and that country is the biggest recipient by far of U.S. military and security assistance in the Americas.

In his statement issued from Bogota, Colombia's capital, Uribe noted he was attending Harvard University in 1991 and was not living in Colombia. He also insisted that he had no business of any kind outside of the country and that his father, Alberto Uribe Sierra, was murdered by left-wing guerrillas in 1983 while resisting a kidnap attempt.

He added that he did not actively oppose extradition of alleged drug-traffickers to the United States but spoke out only in favour of delaying a referendum on the issue until after parliamentary and presidential elections pending at the time. In that connection, Uribe stressed he had authorised the extradition of more than 170 individuals to various countries on drug-trafficking and related charges since becoming president.

At the same time, Uribe's statement did not deny what the NSA called the ''most significant allegation reported in the document: that Uribe had a close personal relationship with Pablo Escobar and business dealings with the Medellin Cartel''.

''Because both the source of the report and the reporting officer's comments section were not declassified, we cannot be sure how the DIA judged the accuracy of this information'', said Michael Evans, director of the NSA's Colombia Documentation Project. ''But we do know that intelligence officials believed the document was serious and important enough to pass on to analysts in Washington''.

NSA also noted that much of the information on other individuals identified in the report ''is accurate and easily verifiable. It is evident that a significant amount of time and energy went into compiling this report, and that it did not come from a single source at a cocktail party as these reports often do''.

In a book published late last year entitled 'More Terrible Than Death: Massacres, Drugs and America's War in Colombia'', Robin Kirk, who has been chief Colombia researcher for the group Human Rights Watch (HRW) since 1992, noted that none of Uribe's political foes had been able to prove his alleged links to drug trafficking ''beyond the inevitable contact that anyone living in Antioquia during the 1980s might have had, particularly if that person had interests in land and politics''.

In 1984, according to Kirk, Colombian police seized a helicopter at whose registry number corresponded to a machine purportedly owned by Alberto Uribe, Alvaro's father. Investigators also once identified a brother's telephone number stored in one of the cell phones used by Escobar.

''But on the day the calls were logged, the family claims that the brother was mute, hospitalised with throat cancer. Alvaro claims that the telephone had been 'cloned', a technique used by Medellin criminals to steal cell phones to make free calls'', adds Kirk.

Michael Shifter, vice president of the establishment oriented Inter-American Dialogue, predicts the release will not immediately affect Uribe.

"I think it's going to reinforce on both sides: for those who are anti-Uribe, it will give them more ammunition; and Uribe defenders will see this as part of a smear campaign. So, at the end of the day, I don't think it will make much difference in terms of Uribe's bid to change the constitution to run for re-election or U.S. support for Colombia under Uribe, unless more evidence comes out to confirm or corroborate the report," he said.

''In the big picture'', according to Isaacson, ''almost everybody in Colombia's ruling class was mixed up in drugs until (former U.S. President) Ronald Reagan declared war on drugs in the mid-1980s''.

Read rest of the story at:

Copyright © 2004 IPS-Inter Press Service. All rights reserved


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6614.htm

Louis Pio
4th August 2004, 01:52
Interesting.
It's just strange that the article don't look at the even more direct links between the cali cartell and government officials. They got those while chasing Pablo Escobar, the USA backed their deathsquads which were used to attack his family, employies and family of emploies.

Guerrilla22
4th August 2004, 02:11
It's interesting that the US is always willing to overlook the misdeads, of those it seems to have in its pocket. Anyone remember Noriega?

Louis Pio
4th August 2004, 02:16
Yes I remember Noriega, Saddam, Pinochet, Musharaf, King Faud of Saudi Arabia and so on, the list is milelong. The USA don't care one bit about democracy obviously, but it's a rather nice cover for them. So it's not too obvious for their own population and the population of their allies. Like Denmark :(

all-too-human
4th August 2004, 02:18
The united states has a history of propping up dictators in latin america, this is no different. The only consideration that the bush administration had when making these decisions was the price of coffee, which is extremely important to the lobby in washington.

Louis Pio
4th August 2004, 02:28
The only consideration that the bush administration had when making these decisions was the price of coffee, which is extremely important to the lobby in washington.

Back in the days the price of coke was also a consideration for Bush :D
Maybe it still is? ;)

h&s
4th August 2004, 10:12
Well Bush snr. has been desribed as a 'Drug Lord,' so maybe Dubya's taking a leaf out of daddie's book?

all-too-human
4th August 2004, 17:39
What about the bush and reagan administration's ridiculously moralist drug policy? didn't they lead a holy crusade against marijuana users everywhere?

Skeptic
5th August 2004, 03:04
I think the most important aspect about this subject is that the United Snakes government is the largest entity world wide, growing drugs, protect drug fields, shipments and drug dealers, as well as the largest entity importing drugs into its own borders and using the secret police and regular police agencies distribute the poison to a volunerable population. This has been true at least since the 1940s, from Viet Nam, Burma, the Golden Triangle, to the Golden Cresent, Afghanistan. Britain and the USA forced opium poppies grown in Indian on the Chinese popluation. A government can get rid of drug use but that's not what you'll hear Libertarians say. Mao erridacted drug use and there were 15 million addicts in China when the PLA won it's revolution.

fernando
7th August 2004, 11:07
Im waiting for Colombia's (user here) reaction

Colombia
7th August 2004, 12:55
The US is probably just providing a front with backing Alvaro Uribe.I'm sure they're doing something behind the lines.

refuse_resist
7th August 2004, 23:07
Originally posted by [email protected] 4 2004, 02:28 AM

Back in the days the price of coke was also a consideration for Bush :D
Maybe it still is? ;)
Of course, that's the family business. International drug and weapons trafficing, and scamming everyone.

Guerrilla22
8th August 2004, 01:15
Originally posted by [email protected] 7 2004, 12:55 PM
The US is probably just providing a front with backing Alvaro Uribe.I'm sure they're doing something behind the lines.
Yeah, like arming and trainning far right para military outfits and giving them the green light to terrorize the population.

Colombia
8th August 2004, 20:28
Originally posted by [email protected] 8 2004, 01:15 AM
Yeah, like arming and trainning far right para military outfits and giving them the green light to terrorize the population.
Can you back that up with a source?

Guerrilla22
9th August 2004, 00:09
http://www.amnestyusa.org/countries/colomb...ny10122000.html (http://www.amnestyusa.org/countries/colombia/congressional_testimony10122000.html);)

Colombia
9th August 2004, 20:21
The report shows no conclusive evidence of US backing of paramilitaries.

Guerrilla22
9th August 2004, 22:11
http://www.colombiapeace.org/documents_2001_16.html

h&s
10th August 2004, 08:54
Here's an excerpt from the link for those of you who can't be arsed to read it:

Western governments are at best guilty of passive consent to paramilitary activity, particularly the US, by supporting a military with documented links to death squads. Colombia is the 3rd largest recipient of US military aid and receives the highest amount of US ‘counter-narcotics’ aid, despite the Colombian military having the worst human rights record in the western hemisphere. In 1991 the CIA and US military oversaw a restructuring of military intelligence, an intelligence network which over the last ten years has been responsible for creating numerous paramilitary units, and carrying out hundreds of extrajudicial executions and disappearances. Although the restructuring order (200-05/91) was sold as aiding counter-narcotics, there were no references (at all) to drugs in the 16-page pamphlet. At worst Western governments are actively supporting the paramilitaries and their activity in Colombia. Although there is as yet no direct evidence to link the US to the paramilitaries, it would not be the first time the US military has used illegal paramilitary groups to protect their interests - for example, the Contra in Nicaragua. There are unsubstantiated (as yet) claims that the US have links to Carlos Castano (retired AUC leader). It is documented that the DEA used the Cali Cartel in their fight against drug kingpin Pablo Escobar, a cartel of which Castano was a member. Furthermore Amnesty International recently filed a lawsuit against the CIA who are accused of improperly withholding information concerning their relationship with Carlos Castano. If this proves to be the case, such action would suggest direct links to the paramilitary death squads and their activities in Colombia.