Log in

View Full Version : profits of war



MJM
25th April 2002, 04:11
Got this in my email.

-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the April 25, 2002
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

ENDLESS WAR=ENDLESS PROFITS:
WHAT KIND OF "PEACE" DOES THE U.S. WANT?

By Sara Flounders

What kind of "peace" do President George W. Bush and the
rest of the U.S. establishment want to see in Palestine and
throughout the Middle East?

A brief look at the role of the U.S. in the region answers
that question.

Every U.S. administration, Republican or Democrat, has given
complete military, economic and diplomatic support to Israel
since its establishment in 1948. Israel acts as a secure
base in a region where 300 million Arab people are
struggling to throw off colonial domination.

During the eight years that the Clinton administration was
brokering the "Oslo Accords" that were supposedly to lead to
a Palestinian homeland, it was pumping billions of dollars
of military aid into Israel. During those "peace talks," the
number of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and Gaza more
than doubled. The number of settlers in the Israeli-occupied
West Bank rose to more than 400,000.

An extensive system of Israeli-only bypass roads carved the
very land that was supposed to become the new Palestinian
state into smaller and smaller cantons cut off from each
other. This was not done in secret, or without Washington's
backing.

It's also no secret the United States has continued to
heavily arm Israel during the last 18 months of the
Palestinian Intifada, or Uprising. An estimated 1,300
Palestinians have been gunned down by Israeli fire and more
than 30,000 wounded.

The purpose of Secretary of State Colin Powell's current
Middle East trip is to try to paper over the brutality of
the Israeli occupation with a temporary cease-fire so that
the United States can proceed with all-out war against Iraq.
The Pentagon is the most powerful military machine in world
history, but U.S. leaders fear unleashing its terror because
of aroused mass anger throughout the Arab world.

When Bush demands that the Palestinians renounce violence in
the face of an Israeli onslaught, he's really saying: End
the resistance and submit to occupation.

U.S. aid to Israel--the largest recipient--now exceeds $12-
$15 million dollars a day, every day of the year. The money
goes to Boeing, Lockheed, General Dynamics and other U.S.
corporations. It is delivered to Israel as tanks, jet
aircraft, helicopter gunships and ammunition.

This is a source of endless profit for the powerful, tiny
ruling class in the United States.

Instability in the region means continuing U.S. domination
and an ongoing stream of lucrative military contracts.

So the owners of the U.S. military-industrial complex don't
want peace in Palestine or anywhere in the world. War is too
profitable.

The Bush administration is determined to open a new
devastating war against Iraq, in spite of the opposition of
every country in the region. U.S. corporations are hungry to
control the vast Iraqi oil reserves, estimated at more than
100 billion barrels. In the meantime they are determined to
keep Iraqi oil off the markets, continue starvation economic
sanctions and control the revenue from the small amount of
oil Iraq is permitted to pump.

ADDICTED TO WAR PROFITS

More than $50 billion a year is reportedly spent on Pentagon
bases in the Persian Gulf region to maintain U.S. corporate
control of the largest source of oil wealth in the world.
The Pentagon military bases throughout the Persian Gulf keep
the whole region in a prison lockdown.

This vast military presence benefits the biggest U.S.
corporations in several ways. The system of bases, aircraft
carriers and thousands of troops in the Persian Gulf gives
the United States a dominant position, even against other
competing imperialist powers, in the control of two-thirds
of the world's known oil reserves.

These bases help prop up the tiny, corrupt monarchies in the
oil-rich states. The royal families in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait,
Qatar and United Arab Emirates hand over the majority of oil
revenue to purchase weapons from U.S. military corporations.
The richest oil monarchies, such as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait,
have ended up as debtor nations. The average person in Saudi
Arabia, where illiteracy is still 60 percent, doesn't
benefit from the oil wealth.

In addition, the enormous U.S. military expenditure amounts
to a direct subsidy of guaranteed super-profits to the
biggest U.S. oil and military corporations. It is paid for
with the tax dollars of working people.

Today more than half the federal budget is spent on past,
present and future wars. This was true even before George W.
Bush said in his State of the Union speech asking for a $43
billion Pentagon increase, "The budget I have submitted is
the largest single increase in military spending in a
generation."

How will this war budget be paid?

Hundreds of desperately needed programs will be slashed. For
example, the $225 million dollars slated for youth job
training grants to 36 cities has been cut to a mere $45
million.

Just one Osprey aircraft costs $84 million. The Pentagon has
50 on order.

The cost of three of these aircraft could pay for the youth
job training program. So why isn't this far more rational
choice made by Congress, the White House and U.S. policy
makers? Don't the majority of people in this country want
and need job training, education, universal health care and
decent housing?

Yes. But social programs don't provide as high a rate of
profit as military contracts. In a profit-driven capitalist
economy, this propels capital investment in the direction of
larger and larger military contracts. New expenditures can
only be justified by new military threats and provocations.

That's why the U.S. capitalist economy is addicted to war.

To pay for this addiction, Social Security retirement funds
are being looted to insure the profits of the giant oil and
military corporations.

Capitalism is a system of ruthless competition among giant
monopolies that need and feed on war. The very survival of
these corporations is entirely dependent on their control of
markets and an endless stream of billions of dollars in
military contracts.

The U.S. portrays its military juggernaut as all-powerful
and invincible. But the small nation of Palestinian people
who have courageously stood up to the military might of the
U.S.-backed occupation have ignited an explosive global
movement in solidarity that is challenging the U.S. military
machine and its drive for war.

Now it's important within the United States to widen
solidarity with the Palestinian liberation struggle. And
building broad opposition to the Pentagon's "endless wars"
is an indispensable part of fighting the whole rotten
capitalist system.

- END -

Dhul Fiqar
25th April 2002, 12:16
Here's another good article on the subject of war for profit, with some interesting facts about Dubya's connections to the big business of war:

---

Who’s making money off the war?

By Barbara Ferguson, Arab News Corespondent


WASHINGTON, 12 November — With the war grinding on in Afghanistan, low-voiced rumors are beginning to circulate in Washington regarding who stands to profit from the war.

It is the Carlyle Group, a Washington-based private equity investment firm, which is raising inevitable questions about waging war for profit.

David Rubenstein, a staff member in the Carter White House, founded the Carlyle Group in 1987. The firm has succeeded in recruiting former politicians as consultants, including former President George H.W. Bush, along with several of his associates.

The Bush connection to the Carlyle Group is nothing short of scandalous, says Larry Klayman, a notable government watchdog.

Now that the United States is bombing Afghanistan and allocating huge sums of money for defense, including $40 billion for the "war on terrorism" and more than $200 billion for the Joint strike Fighter (JSF), the conflict of interest is "direct," Klayman says. "President Bush should not ask, but demand that his father pull out of the Carlyle Group," as Carlyle owns many of the companies that will share in the $200 billion JSF deal.

"Carlyle is as deeply wired into the current administration as they can possibly be," Charles Lewis, executive director for the Center for Public Integrity, recently told reporters. "George Bush is getting money from private interests that have business before the government, while his son is president. And, in a really peculiar way, George W. Bush could, some day, benefit financially from his own administration’s decisions, through his father’s investments. The average American doesn’t know that. To me, that’s a jaw-dropper."

The Carlyle Group, which claims to be the largest US private-equity fund with some $14 billion in assets, makes money by investing in undervalued companies and reselling them at a profit. The Washington Business Journal said in May that the Carlyle Group "seems to play by a different set of rules."

Open only to the very rich, Carlyle owns numerous defense- related companies, and has considerable business with the US government. It is now one of the biggest US defense contractors, and a major force in global telecommunications. Carlyle employees many former top-level government officials from the Bush and Reagan administrations, including former President Bush. The chairman is Frank Carlucci who was Ronald Reagan’s defense secretary.

Former Secretary of State James Baker III, former Budget Director Richard Darman, and Arthur Levitt, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission through most of the Clinton Administration are all senior advisers to the firm.

"Nothing in recent history seems to approach the success this group has had in the wholesale conversion of former high government rank to gigantic profits," Dan K. Thomasson, former editor of Scripps Howard News Service wrote in March 2001. The success of the relatively young Carlyle Group is hardly surprising given that it primarily buys companies that are regulated by government. Nearly two-thirds of its investments are in defense and telecommunications companies, which are affected by shifts in government spending and policy.

Additionally, with Carlucci as chairman, it is no surprise that Carlyle is drawn to defense firms. Carlyle owns numerous defense and aerospace firms such as United Defense Industries, which makes tanks, guided missiles, space vehicles, and weapons delivery systems.

Carlucci’s knowledge of the Pentagons’ inner workings gives Carlyle an advantage when buying defense companies that have fallen in market value. The fact that President Bush’s father and his secretary of state, James Baker, serve as senior advisers to the company has raised red flags in Washington. Bush senior and Baker reportedly use their extensive government contacts to further their business interests as Carlyle Group representatives. "It punches up the brand awareness for us globally," said Carlyle partner Dan D’Aniello. "We are greatly assisted by Baker and Bush. It shows that we are associated with people of the highest ethical standards."

Baker’s stake was estimated to be worth more that $180 million when the fund was valued at $3.5 billion; today it is worth much more.

Bush senior has no ownership stake in Carlyle. As an adviser and an investor, however, Bush is allowed to put the money he earns giving speeches, between $80,000 and $100,000 per speech, into Carlyle’s investment funds.

deimos
25th April 2002, 17:08
yes thats true!We have to fight against it!Don't by israeli made products!