Ah, more manipulation of my title

[Capitalist Imperial]

I see you have labelled me with my own tag line, "cutie pie". How ingeneous. You also removed my "3000+ posts" to "-2".

Wow, you sure showed me.

Can I have my own name and post count back, please?

[Pedro Alonso Lopez]

No.

[James]

I agree.
Even though i don't "like you" (as in what you post, i'm sure you a capital [no pun intended] chap in real life though etc etc): this is going "too far".

If people don't like what you have to say, they should either;
1: participate in a mature and decent debate with you (even though you may not always be decent)
2: don't read your posts

I really don't see how this is sooo difficult...

[MiDnIgHtMaRaUdEr]

Why did you ever come here? Why don't you just take the hint and mosey over to *************** (http://***************)

[LuZhiming]

MiDnIgHtMaRaUdEr < Capitalist Imperial

[MiDnIgHtMaRaUdEr]

:blink: Is that good?

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 06:12 PM
Why did you ever come here? Why don&#39;t you just take the hint and mosey over to *************** (http://***************)
I keep my frinds close, and my enemies closer.

Why are you in opposing ideologies?

Isn&#39;t the name of this forum self-evident as to my reason for being here?

Besides, this forum really benefits from me being here. Lets no kid ourselves, I submit posts that are very popular and provoke controversy, as well as a lot of discussion.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 06:16 PM
MiDnIgHtMaRaUdEr < Capitalist Imperial


Incorrect, sir.

I&#39;ve never used a shadow ID.

Or are you are saying (with the "<") that MM was worse than me?

If so, thanks, then.

[LuZhiming]

Originally posted by Capitalist [email protected] 14 2004, 06:40 PM
Or are you are saying (with the "<") that MM was worse than me?

If so, thanks, then.
Yes, he is worse than you.

[Misodoctakleidist]

It means "Capitalist Imperial is greater than MM," I&#39;m not sure how great that actauly makes him though.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Am I being damned with faint praise? LOL

[canikickit]

"cutie pie".

:D :lol:

[Sabocat]

....

[MiDnIgHtMaRaUdEr]

Care to elaborate a bit how how Capitalist Imperial is "greater" then me? Is their something about his obnoxiousness that you find attractive? Why don&#39;t you two hook up and perhaps you can have a bunch of lovely Republican babies? I&#39;m stuck in opposing ideologies because I said somethings that offended the more anarchistic members on the board a very long time ago. If you are really here just to submit posts that piss people off, then don&#39;t be surprised when people take those sort of actions.

[Invader Zim]

I dont see the point in removing your post count, very stupid. Who ever did it has way too much time on their hands.

Though cutie pie is rather funny, I must say.

[Lardlad95]

what I&#39;m wondering is...what did you do to piss off whoever did that so bad that they would do that...if that makes any sense

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 07:49 PM
"cutie pie".

:D :lol:
someone obviously manipulated they system so that when I type "commie-puke" (without the hyphen), it automatically changes to "cutie pie"

Censorship, a hallmark action of Pinko Gadflies.

Stupid Cutie - Pies

[Stapler]

Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 09:58 PM
Care to elaborate a bit how how Capitalist Imperial is "greater" then me? Is their something about his obnoxiousness that you find attractive? Why don&#39;t you two hook up and perhaps you can have a bunch of lovely Republican babies? I&#39;m stuck in opposing ideologies because I said somethings that offended the more anarchistic members on the board a very long time ago. If you are really here just to submit posts that piss people off, then don&#39;t be surprised when people take those sort of actions.
not greater, just larger.

[Guerrilla22]

[QUOTE]Besides, this forum really benefits from me being here. Lets no kid ourselves, I submit posts that are very popular and provoke controversy, as well as a lot of discussion.

Pretty much everything you write is nothing more than stupid rhetoric that leaves you open to getting slammed on by every Che lives member including myself. I&#39;ve posted replys to your threads quite often, but for some reason you lack the courage to try and debate me.

[Capitalist Imperial]

Originally posted by [email protected] 15 2004, 12:12 AM
[QUOTE]Besides, this forum really benefits from me being here. Lets no kid ourselves, I submit posts that are very popular and provoke controversy, as well as a lot of discussion.

Pretty much everything you write is nothing more than stupid rhetoric that leaves you open to getting slammed on by every Che lives member including myself. I&#39;ve posted replys to your threads quite often, but for some reason you lack the courage to try and debate me.
There are plenty of posts in which I debate. You can check the archivves. I just need something more than the usual canned answers that I&#39;ve been addressing for 2 years. I refuse to have the same debate 10x over. Also, it doesn&#39;t matter what you are saying or what your beliefs are, internet chat rooms have little to do with either having or not having courage.

As far as your 2nd paragraph goes, you have to understand that I see most of the slams in response to me as B.S. rhetoric just the same as you claim that I propogate.

[MiDnIgHtMaRaUdEr]

not greater, just larger.

And that has what to do with the manipulation of Capitalist Imperial&#39;s title?

[synthesis]

For God&#39;s sake, if this is the worst thing you have to complain about while posting on a board run by people who are so radically opposed to everything you stand for, really, consider yourself lucky.

[Commie Girl]

Okay...this is really funny :lol: , but I must say I look forward to seeing what CI has to say....I think you liven up the discussion quite a bit...&#39;nuff said.

[Daniel Karssenberg]

I wouldn&#39;t call this censorship I think it is funny to be honest...

[Capitalist Imperial]

Well, its not true censorship of course, and it is somewhat funny.

You are still all mostly still pinko bastards, though.

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

You are still all mostly still pinko bastards, though.

Pinko? I&#39;m a full-blooded Red, Red to the bone, and you&#39;d better believe it crapitalist pig. :P

[Danton]

Ha&#33; Crapitalist, that&#39;s hilarious, do you see what he&#39;s done there? It&#39;s a play on the word capitalist but he&#39;s made it Crapitalist, it&#39;s fucking genious, genious Noxion you dumb fucking brute.

[Daniel Karssenberg]

On the other hand... the reason Capitalist Imperial is disliked is probably because of his ideologies. If he&#39;d say the same things only pro-Communist you&#39;d all love him.

[Urban Rubble]

I actually agree with CI, his shit should be changed back. This is why this place continues to be a big circle jerk, because nobody is down to have a rational debate with someone of a differing ideology.

[Guest1]

Originally posted by Urban [email protected] 15 2004, 03:34 PM
I actually agree with CI, his shit should be changed back. This is why this place continues to be a big circle jerk, because nobody is down to have a rational debate with someone of a differing ideology.
Blah blah blah... <_< I can think of bigger things to complain about than our treatment of the Capitalists. Just because we give him a funny title, doesn&#39;t mean we won&#39;t refute his bullshit anymore.

I didn&#39;t give him this new title, I think my "reagan&#39;s *****" one was funnier, but I&#39;m gonna leave it. I think it has become funny, cause of the reaction its gotten.

As for the rest of you, why don&#39;t you get up and organize a union instead of worrying about Capitalist Imperial&#39;s own insults being slung back at him? See if you did that, and if this fascist asshole gave everyone the respect you expect us to give him, your complaints may be taken a bit more seriously.

Move along, go read up on Syndicalism or something, cause there&#39;s nothing to see here :P

[Urban Rubble]

Blah blah blah... I can think of bigger things to complain about than our treatment of the Capitalists. Just because we give him a funny title, doesn&#39;t mean we won&#39;t refute his bullshit anymore.

No need to be a dick, it&#39;s just how I feel. Personally, I enjoy having Capitalists here to debate with, and I feel like if we keep doing this immature bullshit that we won&#39;t have anymore, which I&#39;m sure most of you wouldn&#39;t mind. I guess it comes down to this: Do we want people of opposing ideologies to come here and debate or do we want to be immature and fuck with their accounts. If you don&#39;t want them here, fine, fuck with them all you want, but if you like having these guys to debate with I&#39;d leave them alone. Prove them wrong in debate, don&#39;t go fucking around with their account. That&#39;s the equivelant of calling someone a name rather than debating them.

No hard feelings CyM, no need to get angry, I just disagree with all this.

[Ortega]

This is ridiculous. Why mess with his post count as well as his title?&#33; It crosses the line from "funny" to "immature", and makes this site look awful&#33;

[ÑóẊîöʼn]

Originally posted by [email protected] 15 2004, 03:25 PM
Ha&#33; Crapitalist, that&#39;s hilarious, do you see what he&#39;s done there? It&#39;s a play on the word capitalist but he&#39;s made it Crapitalist, it&#39;s fucking genious, genious Noxion you dumb fucking brute.
HAHAHA restricted Member&#33;

[enigma2517]

Mixed feelings about this. I actually know what its like to be in his position. I used to argue somewhat on the Capitalist Paradise message board. They just kept deleting my posts and calling me a commie, overall being really disrespectful. It wasn&#39;t fun. I too felt relentless in refuing the same canned responses. There was probably only one guy (Inviticus) which helped stimulate some developed thought.

Anyway, as long as u guys aren&#39;t downright mean to CI then who cares. Funny titles and post numbers are pretty frivlous. Lets just keep debating, thats the important thing.