Log in

View Full Version : Bill Clinton and his “meetings” with Osama Bin lad



Rex_20XD6
21st June 2004, 06:07
Years before the public knew about bin Laden, Bill Clinton did. Bin Laden first attacked Americans during Clinton's presidential transition in December 1992. He struck again at the World Trade Center in February 1993. Over the next eight years the archterrorist's attacks would escalate killing hundreds and wounding thousands, while Clinton did his best to stymie the FBI and CIA and refused to wage a real war on terror. Why?

The answer is here in investigative reporter Richard Miniter's stunning expose that includes exclusive interviews with both of Clinton's National Security Advisors, Clinton's counter-terrorism czar, his first CIA director, his Secretary of State, his Secretary of Defense, top CIA and FBI agents, lawmakers from both parties and foreign intelligence officials from France, Sudan, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates, as well as on the scene coverage from Sudan, Egypt, and elsewhere.

Losing bin Laden is a dramatic, page-turning read, a riveting account of a terror war that bin Laden openly declared, but that Clinton left largely unfought. With a pounding narrative, up-close characters and detailed scenes, it takes you inside the Oval Office, the White House Situation Room, and within some of the deadliest terrorist cells that America has ever faced. If Clinton had fought back, the attacks on Septe

And you thought it was the Republcan party was the unintellagent ones.

Guerrilla22
21st June 2004, 06:34
At one point during the mid 90's the Pakastani intelligence service, the ISA actually detained Bin Laden inside a house in Afghanistan. They then offered Bin Laden to the Saudis for expeidition because there was a warrant for his arrest in Saudi Arabia, for whatever reason the Saudis turned down the offer and Bin Laden was let go.

Supposedly Clinton had a phone conversation with Mullah Mohammed Omar, the former leader of the Taliban. In this conversation, Clinton supposedly told Omar that the US would "strike" Afghanistan unless Bin Laden was turned over. It cannot be proved that this conversation ever happened though.

h&s
21st June 2004, 09:49
Apparently in early 2001 the Taliban were in talks with the U$ government to discuss the path of an oil pipeline through Afghanistan. In May the Taliban changed their minds and pulled out of the deal. In June, 2001, a U$ official was sent to Pakistan to warn them of an "imminent attack" on Afghanistan. Sounds suspicious to me....

Comrade BNS
21st June 2004, 11:02
Originally posted by [email protected] 21 2004, 06:34 AM
At one point during the mid 90's the Pakastani intelligence service, the ISA actually detained Bin Laden inside a house in Afghanistan. They then offered Bin Laden to the Saudis for expeidition because there was a warrant for his arrest in Saudi Arabia, for whatever reason the Saudis turned down the offer and Bin Laden was let go.

Supposedly Clinton had a phone conversation with Mullah Mohammed Omar, the former leader of the Taliban. In this conversation, Clinton supposedly told Omar that the US would "strike" Afghanistan unless Bin Laden was turned over. It cannot be proved that this conversation ever happened though.
Sorry just one minor corection it's the ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence agency). but yeah they did have bin laden, in fact he and Mullah Omar are probably kicking back in one of the ISI's private, in vogue "detention compunds"(mansion with big walls and security to keep ppl out not it) in Lahore right now.

Comrade BNS

Guerrilla22
21st June 2004, 21:50
whoops