Log in

View Full Version : ARMS FOR ALL! - ARMS FOR ALL!



Franco
2nd April 2002, 23:20
Consider the despicable global arms trade in which the U.S. dominates. The U.S. will sell weapons, gear and training to all comers with cash or a country with exploitable geography and resources. The U.S. War Corporation counts as its clients Chad, with an annual per capita income of $230, and Kenya, whose law enforcement is skilled at "common methods of torture…including hanging persons upside down for long periods, genital mutilation, electric shocks, and deprivation of air by submersion of the head in water", according to the Council for a Livable World (CLW). Despite all this, the American citizenry refuses to heed Eisenhower’s warning and has taken its liberty "for granted," placing its trust in U.S. officials who see "evil" and threats in every corner.

For this ignorance-of-the-damned, the American people have now brought upon themselves the militarization of American society that Eisenhower so feared, and that Herbert Marcuse so eloquently described in One Dimensional Man. The American people are routinely psyop’ed by the War Corporation into an "us-versus-them" mentality; we’re right, your wrong—no argument allowed. Is it any surprise that a less enlightened retired U.S. Army General, Colin Powell, recently admitted that the War on Terrorism will never end "in our lifetime"? Today, sadly, the U.S. War Corporation has taken almost complete control of America and has marshaled its entire war machinery against approximately 33 foreign terrorist groups, numbering perhaps 5,000 to 8,000 individuals who are mostly impoverished and oppressed by ruthless regimes who retaliate with the armaments, strategies and tactics purchased from the U.S. War Corporation.

GlobalIssues.org reports that close to $1 trillion dollars is spent on worldwide military expenditures and the international weapons trade. They rightly point out that globalization has caused weapons makers to take a globalization and porous border approach to selling weapons. In the words of one U.S. "defense" contractor, "We have no allegiance, this is a business and we sell to whatever country can afford them." The CLW’s research indicates that U.S. military spending comprises over half (53 percent) of total discretionary spending ($755 billion), an increase from 48 percent in fiscal year 2001. The proposed military budget of $396.1 billion is 15 percent higher than the average Cold War budget, even in today's dollars. CLW reports that from 1946 to 1989 the U.S. budget authority for defense was an average of $343 billion a year (fiscal year 2003 dollars). In terms of outlays, according to the Senate Budget Committee minority staff, the proposed spending in fiscal year 2003 exceeds the Cold War average by $44 billion. How much money is enough?

guerrillaradio
2nd April 2002, 23:41
That's all well and good, but why are you naming yourself after a fascist dicator??

PunkRawker677
3rd April 2002, 01:10
His real name is Franco.. hes not 'named' after anyone..

I Will Deny You
3rd April 2002, 03:40
There was a fake organization a while back called Arm the Homeless and it was supposed to be a mixing of left-wing values (helping the homeless) and right-wing values (giving everyone a gun). The idea was to give guns to homeless people, obviously. Of course it was a joke, but some people actually took it seriously! It just goes to show how casually the American public views weapons, which is why it's no surprise that what you wrote about hasn't caused very much of a stir.

RedCeltic
3rd April 2002, 04:54
I agree Lindsay, the best aid the government can give the homeless is to arm them all with AK47s.

*Wondering if anyone can think of why this would be a bad idea...*

Angie
3rd April 2002, 11:38
Add to that the fact that it's not easy to aim straight when you're starving. They'd be shooting wide 80% of the time, which is kind of pointless.

Zippy
4th April 2002, 10:23
Quote: from Angie on 12:38 pm on April 3, 2002
Add to that the fact that it's not easy to aim straight when you're starving.
They could shoot cats and have something for their dinner.

Zippy.

Kez
4th April 2002, 14:16
Shoot George and Bungle and have feast for the homeless, then for dessert.......ZIPIE CAKE!

yum yum

comrade kamo

honest intellectual
4th April 2002, 22:42
Quote: from Zippy on 11:23 am on April 4, 2002

Quote: from Angie on 12:38 pm on April 3, 2002
Add to that the fact that it's not easy to aim straight when you're starving.
They could shoot cats and have something for their dinner.

Zippy.

Zippy always does that

RedRevolutionary87
5th April 2002, 01:51
whats wrong with arming the poeple, they could overthrow the government! we need to arm the masses!

Zippy
5th April 2002, 13:30
Quote: from TavareeshKamo on 3:16 pm on April 4, 2002
Shoot George and Bungle and have feast for the homeless, then for dessert.......ZIPIE CAKE!
Id laugh but your humour always causes my bowels to clamp up. http://www.placeboforum.com/vb/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif

Zippy.

Malvinas Argentinas
6th April 2002, 01:01
Only use arms when institutinal resources are unavailable.