Log in

View Full Version : Two Funerals, Two Americas



RedCeltic
17th June 2004, 21:28
Here is a really good article about these two men.

http://www.ericlee.me.uk/archive/000081.html


June 14, 2004

Two Funerals, Two Americas

Ronald Reagan and Victor Reuther were born only months apart in the years before the first world war. They both died last weekend in America, aged 92 and 93. One is being mourned by the rich and powerful, with a lavish state funeral planned. The other is being honored more quietly by ordinary working people. Their lives ran along strangely parallel lines, but in the end they came to represent two very different Americas.

Reagan was the son of a shoe salesman in Illinois, while Reuther came from a family of a steel worker in West Virginia. Both were sons of the working class.

Both men eventually became active trade unionists. Reuther helped to found the United Auto Workers (UAW) together with his brothers Walter and Roy. Reagan was repeatedly elected president of the Screen Actors Guild.

Both men played controversial roles in the cold war within the American unions. The Reuther brothers, though committed democratic socialists themselves, purged their union of Communist influence. Reagan was also involved in struggles against both Communist and mob-dominated unions, and apparently quietly informed on Communists in Hollywood to the FBI.

By the 1940s both men were supporters of the Democratic Party -- Reuther having abandoned the Socialists, and Reagan not yet having embraced the Republicans.

And both men were the targets of assassination attempts. In the case of Victor Reuther, a 1949 gunshot attack on his home cost him his eye.

Victor became active in the trade union movement many years before Reagan did -- perhaps inspired by the example of his father who was an active trade unionist.

And while both men opposed Stalinist totalitarianism, Victor Reuther remained a committed democratic socialist even as Reagan drifted further and further to the right.

Victor Reuther retired from the UAW, where he had headed the education department and worked in international affairs in 1972, not long after his brother Walter was tragically killed in a plane crash. At the same time, Ronald Reagan's career was just beginning to take off, leading to a nearly-successful bid for the Republican nomination four years later, when he was already at retirement age, and his election at the age of 69.

Though the two men's lives were lived in parallel, they represented two sides of American life.

Ronald Reagan began his presidency by destroying the air traffic controller's union in the most unabashed and shameless union-busting ever undertaken by the federal government. The unions never forgave him. Reagan's years in office were marked by a spectacular decline in union strength -- a decline from which unions have yet to recover.

Reagan represented that side of America which believed in the individual, distrusted government, and yet wanted to strengthen the military.

Reuther came from that wing of the American trade union movement which promoted "social movement trade unionism." His brother Walter was the outstanding trade union opponent of the Vietnam War, incurring the wrath of more traditional labour leaders like George Meany who supported every military action so long as the enemy was perceived as being "Communist".

Ronald Reagan is today being mourned by the rich and the powerful and by the millions who voted for him and even by some who did not. He is admired for his wit and his charm, and some give him credit for ending the cold war and bringing about the downfall of Communism.

Victor Reuther will not have a grandiose state funeral. Newspapers will not devote pages and pages to his memory. But for trade unionists everywhere, the death of the last of the Reuther brothers is a sad moment indeed.

Moveable Feast
17th June 2004, 21:52
May both men rest in peace. That article is great proof that fortune comes not to the socialist, but to the man with enough common sense to embrace capitalism and live for thyself.

Stapler
18th June 2004, 00:20
Originally posted by Moveable [email protected] 17 2004, 09:52 PM
May both men rest in peace. That article is great proof that fortune comes not to the socialist, but to the man with enough common sense to embrace capitalism and live for thyself.
That's Impressive, you managed to chalk the success of two lives down to monetary wealth and fame, if you could call ronald reagan famous, or even popular.

So please, don't oversimplify.

RedRevolution
18th June 2004, 01:13
This is a great example that Capitalism is a ruthless cycle.


May both men rest in peace. That article is great proof that fortune comes not to the socialist, but to the man with enough common sense to embrace capitalism and live for thyself.


Although the majority of the population of my country try and embrace capitalism very few actually succeed, and All of this wealth does nothing for you and me.

RedCeltic
18th June 2004, 03:24
Originally posted by Moveable [email protected] 17 2004, 04:52 PM
May both men rest in peace. That article is great proof that fortune comes not to the socialist, but to the man with enough common sense to embrace capitalism and live for thyself.
What an odd comment.

The truth is that Ronald Reagan's political beliefs had nothing to do with his fortune. His wealth had been gained as an actor... and therefore by his own labor ulike an actual capitalist. Jack London for example was a very well known author who became quite wealthy from his writing. He also happened to be a socialist. Mark Twain had thought this was funny and asked London once how he could be a socialist and wealthy at the same time. London remarked that he had earned his wealth by his own labor. Therefore, for both men their fortune had nothing to do with poltical ideology.

The Reuther brothers are of course among the most famous American Trade Unionists. My only criteque of this article is how it fails to mention exactly why Reuther broke with the socialist party to support the democrats.

Back when the brothers were founding the UAW, they went on strike to get union representation. Now, back in those days the government had a nasty habit of calling in the national guard to break strikes.

The brothers went to the governer and pleaded their case, asking him to help support the worker's right to organize a shop union by not calling out the guard. The governer didn't call out the guard dispite the bosses peading him to do so. As a result the UAW was born.

Latter, the same governer was up for reelection, and there was going to be a close race between him and an anti-union republican. They went to the Socialist Party and pleaded with them not to run a candidate in that race. The socialist party didn't understand this and said that they had to fight for socialism. So they ran a candidtate who split the vote, and a republican won.

Since than... the Reuther brothers were socialists within the democratic party.