Log in

View Full Version : What makes an anarchist…anarchist?



Blackberry
13th June 2004, 16:30
Note: Original article edited. (16/6/04)
- Voluntarism content added.
- Last paragraph of "non-hierarchy" sub-heading slightly changed.

--------------------

What makes an anarchist…anarchist?

Anarchism is simply a word with minimal meaning to many people. It could either be the doctrine of chaos, or of the abolition of government, and maybe it describes an ideal society to some people.

Whatever the meaning, it is important to recognise that there is a set of principles that are inherent in anarchism. It is an ideology that has been developed by many people over centuries that are recognised as anarchists.

While there are some radical differences between a variety of anarchist thinkers and other anarchists, it is important to recognise that there is a set of principles that make a person an anarchist or not.

Although a clear list is often not clear and mostly it is unspoken of, it can frustrate anarchists with a level of understanding of what anarchism is when someone may call themselves an anarchist but reject one of the core principles.

This is what this paper will explain; exactly what are these core principles. It does not, however, attempt to justify anarchist principles.

Non-Hierarchy

The most important core principle is non-hierarchy, as opposed to hierarchy -- the institutionalisation of authority within a society. According to anarchist theory, hierarchy is harmful and unnecessary to society; including its institutions and relationships. Control in any hierarchy is maintained by coercion -- that is, by the threat of negative sanctions of one kind or another: political, social, economic, physical, psychological, etc.

Anarchists therefore reject the state, class, and capitalism, which all allow individuals to have authority over another, whether political, social, or economic. Racism, sexism, and homophobia are rejected as hierarchical attitudes as well, as hierarchy provides the justification for domination and exploitation involved in these three attitudes.

Participation in or advocacy of any form of authoritative power is rejected in the state, including all levels of government, judiciaries, and security services. However, anarchists may have no choice but to live in a hierarchical society. What is important is that they do not participate in its institutions in order to gain authority.

Direct Democracy or Consensus

Direct democracy is one of the most important fundamentals, and consequently another principle that define an anarchist. Direct democracy is a non-hierarchical form of decision-making, since it is based on equal decision-making power for all people in non-hierarchical political, social, and economic structures. A minority cannot be trusted to make the decisions of a majority, as it is hierarchical.

However, some anarchists disagree with direct democracy, preferring consensus. Consensus is based upon everyone in an organisation or institution agreeing to a decision before it can be put into action.

Voluntarism

Voluntarism is an essential anarchist principle as well. It is important is that an individual is not compulsorily forced to comply with decisions in an anarchist society.

They may choose to withdraw themselves from a decision or actions, but they must not contradict it. Forcing a task upon someone, or contradicting a decision by carrying out contrary actions, is coercion -- a hierarchical and authoritarian mean.

Due Process

Another important core anarchist principle is due process. A society without due process is harmful and cannot let an individual or a group make arbitrary on the spot decisions for them.

Due process -- knowing and following a series of steps that guarantee an individual's security within an anarchist organisation or wider anarchist society is paramount. Automatic access to due process in a society guarantees individuals and small groups rights in that community.

These four key principles is the bread and butter of any anarchist. A rejection of any of these four core principles, including any of the concepts introduced as being contrary to the political theory of anarchism, renders any self-labeled anarchist a non-anarchist. To ignore these is to reject centuries of anarchist history.

apathy maybe
14th June 2004, 02:13
Does your theoretical anarchist see the need for a revolution?

I think most people on the left (or at least most anti-authoritarians) would agree with all these points (even if it is a "yes that would be ideal, but ..." agreement). So what distinguishes an Anarchist from say a Communist? Is it simply a matter of how, or why? Or is there some fundamental difference between Anarchism and Communism (I don't think there is, I'm just putting the point forward).

Organic Revolution
14th June 2004, 04:58
a communist believes in steps to acheive pure anarchy while anarchists, like my self, believe in the jump from capitalism to anarchism. and yes a revolution is needed.

Blackberry
14th June 2004, 09:50
Originally posted by apathy [email protected] 14 2004, 12:13 PM
Does your theoretical anarchist see the need for a revolution?
No. Individualist anarchists consider revolution as being in contradiction to anarchist principles as it involves the expropriation of capitalists, which is consequently authoritarian means. They prefer the creation of alternative institutions and education to gradually develop society into an anarchist society.

What I listed was not a theoretical anarchist. I listed what are considered to be accepted core anarchist principles. They are the very minimum core values required to consider oneself an anarchist.


So what distinguishes an Anarchist from say a Communist? Is it simply a matter of how, or why? Or is there some fundamental difference between Anarchism and Communism (I don't think there is, I'm just putting the point forward).

Anarchism is merely an umbrella name for an extremely wide variety of ideas. It might all be very well to say that there is not much of a difference between "real communists" (as Redstar2000 calls them) and anarcho-communists and anarcho-collectivists. However, would anarcho-mutualists (http://www.infoshop.org/faq/secI3.html#seci33) even be compatiable with communists? I do not think so. And there are no doubt many more different trends within anarchism that are not compatible with communism either. Anarcho-primitivism springs to mind.

apathy maybe
15th June 2004, 03:41
Thanks for the reply. So basicly there are almost as many types of anarchism as there are anarchists. I like that (now if would could all agree with what I think that would be wonderful).

apathy maybe
9th August 2004, 02:54
bumpity bumpity.

I think this should be placed in new to it all.

I just went and found this again. I'll just make the point again, anarchists are anti-hierarchical. Thus if you are opposed to hierarchy, if you don't like people having power over you, then you maybe an anarchist.

The Feral Underclass
16th August 2004, 05:39
Maybe it can be added to the 'Anarchism for Dummies' thread?

Lacrimi de Chiciură
18th August 2004, 07:19
"The Idiots Guide: To Anarchism"

Blackberry
18th August 2004, 07:28
It has been added to http://www.che-lives.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=6421.