Give em a REAL communist state and watch em scream

[Pancho_Villa]

It appears to me that many of the folks here just want to shout 'I'm a Commuist'. If it was the other way around they'd shout 'I'm a capitalist'. they want to be thought of as being 'naughty' and reactionary

Before they shout anything they ought to look at the blatant opression that had and has to be utilised in 'Red' countries.

Now I accept that no matter who is in charge I as a human will be 'opressed' one way or another until I die, so I vote with my feet, wallet whatever to make MY world comfortable.Bugger the rest of you.... you are mere sheep for wolves like me.

I have to also say that I find the idea of 'organised anarchists' a bit of a living oxymoron. But hey they maybe think that an oyxmoron is someone who does not know how to breathe.

[themessiah]

this ideology is so old its a science

text book rejection of society by the youth

it is clear to me that all of the facets of rebellion, mostly those as displayed and developed here and in other boards like this, are controlled debates and topics that exist to serve the status quo. that is, the ruling class develops them and allows the youth to "rebel" against them, IN SAFETY, without actually challenging the ruling class. all of the recurring debates on this board reflect this.

there are many ways to punch through this

however, as long as the text book discussions get repeated, it's a game of checkers and not chess.

the only variation are the insults and order of the words

[Osman Ghazi]

Now I accept that no matter who is in charge I as a human will be 'opressed' one way or another until I die

What a sad existance you live. I feel sorry for you. Personnally, I would never accept that, but whatever floats your boat, right?


I have to also say that I find the idea of 'organised anarchists' a bit of a living oxymoron.

Anarchists are not 'anti-organisation' because that would be stupid. How would anything ever get done? What they are is anti-hierarchy, so as long as the organisation isn't hierarchical, there is no contradiction.


Before they shout anything they ought to look at the blatant opression that had and has to be utilised in 'Red' countries.


'Red' countries like what? North Korea? Please don't make me laugh. There can be no 'red' countries because communism is stateless and international. So, you are either 'red' or a country but you can't be both.

[New Tolerance]

Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 01:08 PM
It appears to me that many of the folks here just want to shout 'I'm a Commuist'. If it was the other way around they'd shout 'I'm a capitalist'. they want to be thought of as being 'naughty' and reactionary

Before they shout anything they ought to look at the blatant opression that had and has to be utilised in 'Red' countries.

Now I accept that no matter who is in charge I as a human will be 'opressed' one way or another until I die, so I vote with my feet, wallet whatever to make MY world comfortable.Bugger the rest of you.... you are mere sheep for wolves like me.

I have to also say that I find the idea of 'organised anarchists' a bit of a living oxymoron. But hey they maybe think that an oyxmoron is someone who does not know how to breathe.
What's your point?

[redstar2000]

Before they shout anything they ought to look at the blatant oppression that had and has to be utilised in 'Red' countries...so I vote with my feet, wallet, whatever, to make MY world comfortable. Bugger the rest of you... you are mere sheep for wolves like me.

How "red" the "red" countries really were is a matter of dispute on this board...not to mention how "repressive" they actually were.

Setting aside your obvious ignorance of these matters for the moment, I am puzzled by someone who calls himself "Pancho Villa" and yet declares himself a "wolf among sheep".

Did you think you had to have a "left" username in order to post rightist clichés?

We can give you a more appropriate username if you wish; how about La Cucaracha?


It is clear to me that all of the facets of rebellion, mostly those as displayed and developed here and in other boards like this, are controlled debates and topics that exist to serve the status quo.

You could've fooled me. Granted the extensive efforts of the capitalist class to recuperate opposing views, I don't think your judgment is confirmed by the contents of this board.


There are many ways to punch through this.

Indeed? What do you suggest?

:redstar2000:

The Redstar2000 Papers (http://www.redstar2000papers.fightcapitalism.net)
A site about communist ideas

[Invader Zim]

'I'm a Commuist'

I love it...

Maybe this "wolf" should learn to spell the word, before he tries to understand what it means.

[The Feral Underclass]

Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 03:08 PM
they want to be thought of as being 'naughty' and reactionary
Communists who want to be reactionary?


Now I accept that no matter who is in charge I as a human will be 'opressed' one way or another until I die

I have some rope if you're interested.


I have to also say that I find the idea of 'organised anarchists' a bit of a living oxymoron.

Shows how little you know about anarchism the doesnt it.

[redstarshining]

Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 02:08 PM
It appears to me that many of the folks here just want to shout 'I'm a Commuist'. If it was the other way around they'd shout 'I'm a capitalist'. they want to be thought of as being 'naughty' and reactionary

Before they shout anything they ought to look at the blatant opression that had and has to be utilised in 'Red' countries.

Now I accept that no matter who is in charge I as a human will be 'opressed' one way or another until I die, so I vote with my feet, wallet whatever to make MY world comfortable.Bugger the rest of you.... you are mere sheep for wolves like me.

I have to also say that I find the idea of 'organised anarchists' a bit of a living oxymoron. But hey they maybe think that an oyxmoron is someone who does not know how to breathe.

they want to be thought of as being 'naughty'

+


you are mere sheep for wolves like me.


=

:D

[Nas]

based on the first post , i say Pancho is selfish , which is no problem really until he finds out how Capitalism has him locked



ps: " It appears to me that many of the folks here just want to shout 'I'm a Communist'. If it was the other way around they'd shout 'I'm a capitalist'."
yeah , sadly i think so too, maybe you are wrong about the "many" part

[Deathb4Dishonor]

Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 01:08 PM
It appears to me that many of the folks here just want to shout 'I'm a Commuist'. If it was the other way around they'd shout 'I'm a capitalist'. they want to be thought of as being 'naughty' and reactionary

Before they shout anything they ought to look at the blatant opression that had and has to be utilised in 'Red' countries.

Now I accept that no matter who is in charge I as a human will be 'opressed' one way or another until I die, so I vote with my feet, wallet whatever to make MY world comfortable.Bugger the rest of you.... you are mere sheep for wolves like me.

I have to also say that I find the idea of 'organised anarchists' a bit of a living oxymoron. But hey they maybe think that an oyxmoron is someone who does not know how to breathe.
YOU GO PANCHO VILLA STICK IT TO THESE WANNA BE COMMUNIST!

[Misodoctakleidist]

"Wanna be communist," how can you want to be a communist without actualy being one?

[Osman Ghazi]

YOU GO PANCHO VILLA STICK IT TO THESE WANNA BE COMMUNIST!

Knib High football rules. You go girl.

[Knowledge 6 6 6]

Ok, let's try to put things into perspective here...

I for one am no communist, but fail to understand how capitalism is any better.

-You claim that if it were the other way around, people would be saying 'I'm a capitalist' if it were 'naughty and reactionary'. Now, I dont think communism is naughty, nor reactionary. In fact, I'm not sure how an equal state is supposed to be born out of this horrendous greed-driven capitalist nonsense that we're in now....but dont be so quick to denounce it.

-If you are at all intelligible about communism, you would know that communism in its truest form has never existed. Castro's Cuba is a dictatorship...some may dub it a socialist state, but even that is too rash in my opinion. Again, your supposed knowledge of communism is obviously lacking here...which is to the smile of myself. Assuming you are right-winged...this comes as no surprise.

-If you want to vote...go ahead. Nobody's telling you not to. You're just participating in a system which has nothing to do with you...in all honesty. Do you think that the gov't would give the public of all people actual control of what goes on?

"What's the difference between George W. Bush and Hitler? Well...Hitler was democratically elected into power." :P

Oh, and I fail to understand how a member with the username 'Pancho Villa' could actually be anti-reactionary. But whatever floats your boat man.

[Lacrimi de Chiciură]

You are truly a moron.

[elijahcraig]

We should make a generic sticky thread here so that every capitalist could come in and read the generic arguments, it would save a lot of time, and space.

We could make Capitalist Argument Number One: Greed is Human Nature.

Then Have Communist/Socialist Reply Number One: Prove it.

Then have Capitalist Reply to Socialist Reply Number One: I can't.

Then have Communist/Socialist Reply to Capitalist Reply to Socialist Reply Number One: Then it's not an argument.

Then have Capitalist Reply To Socialist Reply to Capitalist Reply to Socialsit Reply: Evil Communist! You're probably a subububurbanan kid!

And So on and so forth.

[Raisa]

Originally posted by [email protected] 13 2004, 01:08 PM

Before they shout anything they ought to look at the blatant opression that had and has to be utilised in 'Red' countries.

The only thing that is wrong with those "red" countries, is self serving people like yourself got into the government and raped those people's revolutions.

[Nas]

he is kind of right , there are some wana be communists in this board

[elijahcraig]

Like yourself?

[New Tolerance]

YOU GO PANCHO VILLA STICK IT TO THESE WANNA BE COMMUNIST!

lol, who are you trying to convince? (that we are "wanna" be communists?)

If a person sees something as a threat

the first thing that he would try to do is to physically remove that threat.

If he can't

the second thing he will do is try to go around it (debating).

If he can't

he will try to convince himself that there is no threat. (if we are just a bunch of "wanna bes" then we are no real threat)

(I think you are at the last stage)

- ya and the neo-conservatives are just a bunch of democratic imperialist wanna bes, "I want the whole world to work the same way America works, I wanna, I wanna..."