View Full Version : Press coverage of Reagan's death
Neo-Democratic Force
10th June 2004, 18:33
Whether or not you rejoice or mourn the death of Ronald Reagan, you must admit that it's getting way too much press coverage. So his coffin showed up in Washington: big fucking deal. There's more important things to have on the front page.
gummo
10th June 2004, 20:12
Originally posted by Neo-Democratic
[email protected] 10 2004, 06:33 PM
Whether or not you rejoice or mourn the death of Ronald Reagan, you must admit that it's getting way too much press coverage. So his coffin showed up in Washington: big fucking deal. There's more important things to have on the front page.
I think it's kind of ironic that you say this kind of thing on a forum that is named in honor of someone who has been dead for a long time.
If people didn't care the news wouldn't cover it. If you don't care you can just change the channel.
Misodoctakleidist
10th June 2004, 20:15
Originally posted by
[email protected] 10 2004, 08:12 PM
If people didn't care the news wouldn't cover it.
You're living in a dream world, any sociologist will tell you that isn't true.
gummo
10th June 2004, 20:19
Originally posted by Misodoctakleidist+Jun 10 2004, 08:15 PM--> (Misodoctakleidist @ Jun 10 2004, 08:15 PM)
[email protected] 10 2004, 08:12 PM
If people didn't care the news wouldn't cover it.
You're living in a dream world, any sociologist will tell you that isn't true. [/b]
You don't think ratings affect what the media broadcast? It's hard to find socialogist because most of them are waiting tables.
Capitalist Imperial
10th June 2004, 20:22
Originally posted by Neo-Democratic
[email protected] 10 2004, 06:33 PM
Whether or not you rejoice or mourn the death of Ronald Reagan, you must admit that it's getting way too much press coverage. So his coffin showed up in Washington: big fucking deal. There's more important things to have on the front page.
#1) He was one of history's greatest leaders, and he led history's greatest empire.
#2) "Way too much press coverage"? That is purely subjective opinion. Over 100,000 people showed up in California alone just to pay respects in person. That is a lot, and it reflects America's respect and reverence for this great man, great capitalist, and great American.
Capitalist Imperial
10th June 2004, 20:25
Originally posted by
[email protected] 10 2004, 08:19 PM
It's hard to find socialogist because most of them are waiting tables.
LOL, that was gold.
Guest1
10th June 2004, 21:39
Originally posted by Capitalist
[email protected] 10 2004, 04:22 PM
Over 100,000 people showed up in California alone just to pay respects in person. That is a lot, and it reflects America's respect and reverence for this great man, great capitalist, and great American.
Hundreds of thousands marched in the streets for hitler when he was alive <_<
Capitalist Imperial
10th June 2004, 22:13
Wow, thats only the 1,000,000th inaccurate analogy to Hitler made on this board. Its utter ludicrousness is matched only by the extent to which it is cliche.
I'd bet dollars-to-donuts that if your typical leftist scumbag didn't like the taste of his Fruit Loops, he'd suggest that Tucan Sam was "just like Hitler".
Brilliant.
Does any one else want to go for 1,000,0001?
James
10th June 2004, 22:20
come on CI... there are numerous similarities. Like... they were both men!
And they both had hair.
Face it - he's hitler!
Red Skyscraper
10th June 2004, 22:27
-----
Capitalist Imperial
10th June 2004, 22:42
Originally posted by Red
[email protected] 10 2004, 10:27 PM
Let's see:
Over 100,000 people showed up in California alone just to pay respects in person. That is a lot, and it reflects America's respect and reverence for this great man, great capitalist, and great American.
Population of California: 35.1 million
Population of U$: 288.3 million
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html
Only 100,000 people huh? Out of 35.1 million. That's a drop in the bucket. Nobody gives a shit about Ronald Reagan. The only people stupid enough to show up were the thoughtless neocons and evangelicals who had nothing better to do that day but worship their "dearly departed" leader. :rolleyes: :lol:
American respect and reverence...give me a fucking break.
100,000 showing up in person just to walk by the asket for 3 seconds? This presidents term was 20 years ago. I think that is significant.
The only people stupid enough to show up were the thoughtless neocons and evangelicals who had nothing better to do that day but worship their "dearly departed" leader.
Ah, well thought out. Very clever.
pandora
10th June 2004, 22:42
Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial+Jun 10 2004, 11:55 PM--> (Capitalist Imperial @ Jun 10 2004, 11:55 PM)
[email protected] 10 2004, 08:19 PM
It's hard to find socialogist because most of them are waiting tables.
LOL, that was gold. [/b]
There is no dishonor is being poor, usually there is more honor in it, for one is less distracted by meaningless frivolities, and can be more dedicated to ideas.
Your comments show your ignorance. Don't tell me your classist upon being capitalist, perhaps you would prefer monarchism, or would a nice stay in a U.S. sponsored dictarship suit you best, great fun, until you fall out of favor. . .
Speaking of which, Reagan, the man couldn't even raise his own children let alone a nation, as one of REagan's youth "GREAT BAND" by the way, excellent lyrics, lead singer died few years back, another victim of Reagan's neglect, oh, what was that, yes Reagan inspired an entire generation of parents to turn their backs on their children and throw them on the street called, "Throw away kids" by the media, meanwhile single mom's who worked lost food stamps, causing one mother's friend to call him "son of a *****" every time he came on screen, and too top it all off, our kind leader threw all the crazy people out of the mental institutions onto the street with no support services creating with the street kids and the Vietnam Vets without pensions, a legion of homeless,
Hey man, spare a dime...
Guest1
10th June 2004, 22:50
Originally posted by Capitalist
[email protected] 10 2004, 06:13 PM
Wow, thats only the 1,000,000th inaccurate analogy to Hitler made on this board. Its utter ludicrousness is matched only by the extent to which it is cliche.
I'd bet dollars-to-donuts that if your typical leftist scumbag didn't like the taste of his Fruit Loops, he'd suggest that Tucan Sam was "just like Hitler".
Brilliant.
Does any one else want to go for 1,000,0001?
He's not Hitler, I'm just showing you how rediculous it is to say "he was a good leader cause 100 000 people are coming to his funeral".
I would probably go too if I could, as I'm sure thousands of those coming are planning to do exactly what I would have in mind... :D
Capitalist Imperial
10th June 2004, 22:59
There is no dishonor is being poor, usually there is more honor in it, for one is less distracted by meaningless frivolities, and can be more dedicated to ideas.
Your comments show your ignorance. Don't tell me your classist upon being capitalist, perhaps you would prefer monarchism, or would a nice stay in a U.S. sponsored dictarship suit you best, great fun, until you fall out of favor. . .
Jeez, dude, chill out, it was a frekain' joke
Speaking of which, Reagan, the man couldn't even raise his own children let alone a nation, as one of REagan's youth "GREAT BAND" by the way, excellent lyrics, lead singer died few years back, another victim of Reagan's neglect, oh, what was that, yes Reagan inspired an entire generation of parents to turn their backs on their children and throw them on the street called, "Throw away kids" by the media, meanwhile single mom's who worked lost food stamps, causing one mother's friend to call him "son of a *****" every time he came on screen, and too top it all off, our kind leader threw all the crazy people out of the mental institutions onto the street with no support services creating with the street kids and the Vietnam Vets without pensions, a legion of homeless,
Hey man, spare a dime...
This is the quintessential reason that leftists are such pukes, they are nothing but apologists, and have no sense of personal reponsibility. If someone has problems, its because "mommy and daddy did not give me enough hugs", or "the big bad government is out to get me".
Get some freaking juevos and pull up your own bootstraps. Life is not fair. Almost all of us all face adversity. It is how you deal with it that counts, not who you find to blame.
No wonder a welfare state is so appealing to communists.
Capitalist Imperial
10th June 2004, 23:10
Originally posted by Che y Marijuana+Jun 10 2004, 10:50 PM--> (Che y Marijuana @ Jun 10 2004, 10:50 PM)
Capitalist
[email protected] 10 2004, 06:13 PM
Wow, thats only the 1,000,000th inaccurate analogy to Hitler made on this board. Its utter ludicrousness is matched only by the extent to which it is cliche.
I'd bet dollars-to-donuts that if your typical leftist scumbag didn't like the taste of his Fruit Loops, he'd suggest that Tucan Sam was "just like Hitler".
Brilliant.
Does any one else want to go for 1,000,0001?
He's not Hitler, I'm just showing you how rediculous it is to say "he was a good leader cause 100 000 people are coming to his funeral".
I would probably go too if I could, as I'm sure thousands of those coming are planning to do exactly what I would have in mind... :D [/b]
What is that, hotbox his coffin? :redstar2000:
Guest1
10th June 2004, 23:29
No, I'd have to hotbox a car as I hightail it out of their after having spit on the coffin.
Capitalist Imperial
10th June 2004, 23:46
Originally posted by Che y
[email protected] 10 2004, 11:29 PM
No, I'd have to hotbox a car as I hightail it out of their after having spit on the coffin.
You probably have to much cottonmouth to spit. Besides, the Military color guard would take you down before you could get out.
elijahcraig
10th June 2004, 23:51
Press coverage is the equivalent of myth-making in primitive societies. Reagan is being made into a god, as in former societies, the father of the tribe was made to be a god. I am sure that this is a calculated move by most of the media buzzards, and an attempt to once again "mythologize" the history of America, fostering an illusion in order to adopt a fantasy in other words, as I've read somewhere. We do this with all of our presidents and all of our "great leaders," as most or nearly all countries and societies have done since the beginning of humanity.
In Capitalist society, the gods faces get to go on money, and they get be mourned like dying Jesuses or something.
Very sad spectacle of human rite.
elijahcraig
10th June 2004, 23:52
100,000 showing up in person just to walk by the asket for 3 seconds? This presidents term was 20 years ago. I think that is significant.
Did you see Kim Il Sung's funeral? Similarities?
Capitalist Imperial
10th June 2004, 23:54
Originally posted by
[email protected] 10 2004, 11:52 PM
100,000 showing up in person just to walk by the asket for 3 seconds? This presidents term was 20 years ago. I think that is significant.
Did you see Kim Il Sung's funeral? Similarities?
I would say that they showed up out of fear.
Reagan's mourners showed up out of genuine sympathy and reverence.
elijahcraig
11th June 2004, 00:08
Then you're a moron.
Dr. Rosenpenis
11th June 2004, 00:46
He's not Hitler, I'm just showing you how rediculous it is to say "he was a good leader cause 100 000 people are coming to his funeral".
I would probably go too if I could, as I'm sure thousands of those coming are planning to do exactly what I would have in mind...
C'mon now, comrade. That's a pretty silly assumption, don't you think?
100,000 showing up in person just to walk by the asket for 3 seconds? This presidents term was 20 years ago. I think that is significant.
If 100,000 is so significant, then how significant are the millions of Americans who marched against the war in Iraq and against imperialism?
To be frank, however, I can't deny that many Americans admire the fella. But not even my step-father, a huge admirer of evil politics, isn't very interested in his funeral.
redbhoy59
11th June 2004, 00:47
Damn, sorry.
redbhoy59
11th June 2004, 00:49
.........
redbhoy59
11th June 2004, 00:50
ok, last one.........
dark fairy
11th June 2004, 01:18
all i can say is that those people waiting for 8 hours just to look at his stupid coffin are IDIOTS!!!!
they don't even get to look at his dead face so what the hell is the point the govenment cannot be that stupid to actually put the body of a dead president there... but really too much press coverage and really he was old so it was bound to happen anyway so who cares
Well he is getting alot, but we must remember that he is to the Republicans what JFK is to the Democrats. He was one of the most, if not the most important modern day president. He was also involved in one of the most important events in this nation's history, the collapse of the Soviet Union.
elijahcraig
11th June 2004, 01:39
Remembering JFK here ain't going to do much, we hate him just as much.
I didn't mean that. I mean that Regan is to the Republicans what JFK is to the Democrats. Stop trying to twist my words.
elijahcraig
11th June 2004, 01:44
I'll twist anything I want, son.
Trolling under a different name there RAF?
elijahcraig
11th June 2004, 01:52
I am RAF's removed left kidney.
Dr. Rosenpenis
11th June 2004, 14:05
Originally posted by
[email protected] 10 2004, 08:49 PM
Trolling under a different name there RAF?
:lol:
...dumbass
I think Ray Charles was more important than Ragean, but he doesn't get 40 straight hours of news coverage, does he? :(
Hate Is Art
11th June 2004, 15:00
He should Do!! Damnit RC was great :(
Sabocat
11th June 2004, 16:01
"Way too much press coverage"? That is purely subjective opinion. Over 100,000 people showed up in California alone just to pay respects in person. That is a lot, and it reflects America's respect and reverence for this great man, great capitalist, and great American.
Californians would line up for 6 hours to mourn the death of a grapefruit if it was on T.V. long enough.
Remember, these are the same people who put two "B" actors in office as governor. :rolleyes:
FatFreeMilk
11th June 2004, 20:50
Please don't stereotype all of Californian's as dolts disgustipated :lol:
The press coverage for this shit is ridiculous. Usually I'll eat my breakfast cereal and watch something interesting but today it seemed like all that was on was his funeral. jesus christ man what a way to lose your appetite.
Isn't it retarted how people can go on TV, put on a sad face and tell Americans how Reagan may not have been really popular among all Americans but he sure was a swell guy! Who cares about him contributing to fucking up America cause he could tell really funny jokes!
EneME
11th June 2004, 21:23
Originally posted by
[email protected] 11 2004, 08:50 PM
Please don't stereotype all of Californian's as dolts disgustipated :lol:
Yes...Please...
I think Ray Charles was more important than Ragean, but he doesn't get 40 straight hours of news coverage, does he?
Amen to that..
I've had to go out and rent tons of movies 'cause there's nothing else on the tube besides the endless tributes...pisses me off...they might as well make a tribute this big to fuckin pinochet when he passes..
antieverything
12th June 2004, 04:08
What brought upon the collapse of Communism? Not Ronald Reagan. In the 70's, a survey was conducted across the entire Soviet nation to gain insight on the economic future of the country...its conclusions were the inevitable collapse of the Soviet state within the forseeable future.
I'm not saying commemoration should focus on faults, I'm saying that Reagan is being revered as just short of a God. There is no honest discussion of his relevance or his impact on the nation. The only people being interviewed were and are stuanch Reagan supporters, either that or they talk in the same way so that they won't offend anyone. PBS is the only network I've seen even mention that Reagan was a polarizing figure and that is as far as it has gone on television as far as I can see!
Invader Zim
12th June 2004, 04:43
wow 100,000 people, in a country of approximatly 300,000,000. You know that means that 1 in 30,000 Americans actually went to his funeral. Impressive, truly, you know when the silly old bat died, IE the queen mother, over 250,000 people visited her funeral out of a country of 60,000,000. When Princess Di, died 31.5 million people watched her funeral on TV, half the nation.
And I've told you before there is no way that the US is the greatest empire of all time, militarily, economically, culturally or even just in physical size.
elijahcraig
12th June 2004, 04:53
I think Ray Charles was more important than Ragean, but he doesn't get 40 straight hours of news coverage, does he?
I think Robert Quine was more important than both of them and he got no TV time whatsoever.
Not that I would have liked him to be on TV, since it is basically a whore for the acceptable, and Quine was not acceptable to the masses, ie the common swine.
refuse_resist
12th June 2004, 06:13
Those are some cool pics you posted there comrade redbhoy :D
Yeah, I agree all this news coverage is really getting out of hand. They've been talking about his funeral and all that other crap 24/7 since he's been dead. The other thing that seems to be really disturbing is how they keep calling him "President Reagan" like if he was the president when he died. I feel like we live under some kind of monarchy.
Now as far as all the people who went to see his coffin in CA, these people are very naive. Chances are they have no idea who many innocent victims in the third world were murdered by this scumbag.
All I have to say is this....
Ronald Reagan - butcher of the third world...
Rest In Piss
antieverything
12th June 2004, 14:37
Of course the coverage is 24/7! The "liberal" media is jumping at the opportunity to shift focus from the debacle Iraq has become for as long as possible!
SittingBull47
12th June 2004, 15:14
It's ridiculous. It's like the news has stopped. We don't hear anything more about Iraq. All this torture and resistance "nonsense" (according to the U$ government and media) apparently isn't important enough to share the spotlight with an overrated former president.
Madman
12th June 2004, 15:17
Regan deserves the coverage, he has you communist sissys running scared when you tried to move in on Cuba from Russia.
And fuck Iraq too. They had a dictator, he was overthrown, then they kill the soldeirs who got rid of the dictator as thanks? Nuke the bastards. :P
Osman Ghazi
12th June 2004, 16:45
Regan deserves the coverage, he has you communist sissys running scared when you tried to move in on Cuba from Russia.
And fuck Iraq too. They had a dictator, he was overthrown, then they kill the soldeirs who got rid of the dictator as thanks? Nuke the bastards.
What the fuck?
Red Skyscraper
12th June 2004, 20:58
-----
elijahcraig
15th June 2004, 10:24
Regan deserves the coverage, he has you communist sissys running scared when you tried to move in on Cuba from Russia.
I don't understand what you mean by this.
When we moved in on when and what?
Stapler
16th June 2004, 01:29
I think he's referring to when America's brave fighting men fought the evil dictator Castro's forces at the bay of pigs. As well as how because of them, millions of Columbians can experience the wonders of growing cash crops for the benevolent and caring American consumer.
elijahcraig
16th June 2004, 01:34
Right.
:lol:
moncadista
16th June 2004, 03:13
face the facts, the coverage of reagans death was to block out G8 coverage. its easier to spin a few fascists coming to visit the gippers rotting corpse as a whole nation in mourning, than a large portion of that nation rising up against capitalism as a few crazy anarchist radicals
antieverything
16th June 2004, 03:24
The really interesting thing about this is that the Reagan coverage is without precedent. Sure, you have Kennedy, but that was an assassination. Mark my words, when Carter dies, you won't hear nearly as much bullshit. In 1992, Reagan was the second most unpopular ex-president, behind Nixon. Now he is being portrayed as a god.
elijahcraig
16th June 2004, 03:39
If Clinton died, I wouldn't be surprised if FOX news celebrated.
Or just ignored it.
Stapler
16th June 2004, 03:50
Roanld Reagan was a true Jelly bean conoisseur. On the fateful day of his death, bald eagles everywhere cried magical healing tears, and red white and blue gourmet candies everywhere were relished with a new, patriotic fervor.
note: Canadian and Brittish television only breifly mentioned Raygun's death. Unfortunately, we get Larry King's nightly retrospectives up here on CNN too. Not that anyone here actually watches CNN. That's one of the benefits of having nationalized television, radio, and newspapers.
HankMorgan
16th June 2004, 04:26
Since you can't get enough, here's more:
C-SPAN historians rankings of US presidents (http://www.americanpresidents.org/survey/historians/)
C-SPAN viewers rankings of US Presidents (http://www.americanpresidents.org/survey/viewer/)
Back in 2000 C-SPAN had their viewers and a group of 58 historians rank US Presidents in 10 different categories and overall. The viewers have President Reagan (all presidents continue to be called president even after their term) ranked 6th overall. The historians rank him 11th overall out of 41. Reagan wasn't a Lincoln or a Washington but he was a good president, best of the post-war presidents for sure.
elijahcraig
16th June 2004, 04:31
Being that I consider the making of a "best Presidents" list sort of like making a "best Serial Killers" list, that really doesn't tell me much.
HankMorgan
16th June 2004, 04:44
Originally posted by
[email protected] 16 2004, 12:31 AM
Being that I consider the making of a "best Presidents" list sort of like making a "best Serial Killers" list, that really doesn't tell me much.
You must be so much smarter than I am. I'm a such fool for believing actions like freeing slaves and ending genocides are good actions.
On a side note the June 2004 issue of National Geographic Magazine has a good article on Iraq. There are pictures of the mass graves that would do honor even to a demogogue like peaccenicked. They say there may be as many as 5 to 7 million people who "disappeared" in the last 20 years.
Chalk me up as a moron who believes ending such a regime as Saddam Hussein's was a good thing. I'm sure people like you, elijahcraig, who are so far my intellectual superior will find errors in my thinking but I can live with it.
elijahcraig, do you ever read what you write? Are there people in your life whose opinions you value?
If so do you let them read what you write?
elijahcraig
16th June 2004, 04:52
You must be so much smarter than I am.
You are correct.
I'm a such fool for believing actions like freeing slaves and ending genocides are good actions.
You are such a fool for “believing that actions like freeing slaves and ending genocides” ever occurred under Reagan.
On a side note the June 2004 issue of National Geographic Magazine has a good article on Iraq. There are pictures of the mass graves that would do honor even to a demogogue like peaccenicked. They say there may be as many as 5 to 7 million people who "disappeared" in the last 20 years.
Yes, they would do good—to see the dictator the US put into power, then helped gas his own people, then bombed and destroyed the country he had built (2nd most progressive in Mid east), then bombing and killing tens of thousands more on various occasions. I’m sure the Iraqis will enjoy MORE US fun time.
Chalk me up as a moron who believes ending such a regime as Saddam Hussein's was a good thing. I'm sure people like you, elijahcraig, who are so far my intellectual superior will find errors in my thinking but I can live with it.
I am of course your intellectual superior, and you should bow and worship me in awe of my greatness.
elijahcraig, do you ever read what you write?
I like to read what I write, it increases my pride in my intellectual superiority.
Are there people in your life whose opinions you value?
If so do you let them read what you write?
I told my father today how I would have loved to shoot Ronnie in the face; my mother is a socialist; and they can read anything I set down.
synthesis
16th June 2004, 05:42
Conservatives are hilarious. They don't seem to realize the inconsistency between supporting all kinds of genocidal regimes (let's not forget Reagan's support of apartheid South Africa!) and telling anyone who dissents that it "isn't our business" and to "stop being such cry-baby do-gooders", and then retreat to exactly the same moralistic accusations when all their other excuses for waging war on Iraq turn out to be utter lies and complete deception.
It's a great feeling, knowing these folks have a nuclear arsenal at their fingertips.
Back in 2000 C-SPAN had their viewers and a group of 58 historians rank US Presidents in 10 different categories and overall. The viewers have President Reagan (all presidents continue to be called president even after their term) ranked 6th overall. The historians rank him 11th overall out of 41. Reagan wasn't a Lincoln or a Washington but he was a good president, best of the post-war presidents for sure.
LOL, that isn't representative whatsoever. C-SPAN viewers? What the fuck? If you want demographic statistics, you have to use surveys, not polls.
Guerrilla22
16th June 2004, 06:31
You know Washington had to love the 'ol bastard finally taking the dirt nap, because the media stopped covering the fiasco in Iraq for an entire week. What was funny was Nancy Reagan rubbing the American flag on top of Ronnie's casket. It seemed like she was getting some sort of pleasure out of doing that.
elijahcraig
16th June 2004, 06:33
Typical fetishism.
Guerrilla22
16th June 2004, 06:33
Originally posted by
[email protected] 16 2004, 04:44 AM
You must be so much smarter than I am. I'm a such fool for believing actions like freeing slaves and ending genocides are good actions.
On a side note the June 2004 issue of National Geographic Magazine has a good article on Iraq. There are pictures of the mass graves that would do honor even to a demogogue like peaccenicked. They say there may be as many as 5 to 7 million people who "disappeared" in the last 20 years.
Chalk me up as a moron who believes ending such a regime as Saddam Hussein's was a good thing. I'm sure people like you, elijahcraig, who are so far my intellectual superior will find errors in my thinking but I can live with it.
elijahcraig, do you ever read what you write? Are there people in your life whose opinions you value?
If so do you let them read what you write?
Reagan didn't end any slavery or genocides, he created genocides in Central America.
Archpremier
16th June 2004, 18:30
"Ronald Reagan just had an operation on his asshole, and George Bush just had an operation on his middle finger. What are thse two men trying to tell us?" George Carlin
Stapler
16th June 2004, 23:44
We could make a video! :lol:
antieverything
17th June 2004, 02:50
I think it is very meaningful and important that Reagan had gone from very unpopular after his second term to very popular in 2000. Conservatives had been using his sickness as an excuse to deify the man and the propaganda was very effective. Anyway, which survey do you think is more telling of the man's true legacy, the one taken when people still remembered what he really did or the one taken after they had forgotten most of it?
elijahcraig
17th June 2004, 04:04
In other words: before the myth making took its toll on the collective (forgetful and naive) memory of the American populace.
Deathb4Dishonor
17th June 2004, 04:12
elijahcraig do you really belive that all those things you hear about communist countrys and other leftist countrys are false? not one of them is true? do you really belive that people didnt fear kim I or are you really fucking stupid? i sort of belive you arnt really a leftist but rather you just let shit pour out of your mouth like water over niagra falls for shock value
antieverything
17th June 2004, 04:16
This is neither the place nor the place, DB4D!
elijahcraig
17th June 2004, 04:22
elijahcraig do you really belive that all those things you hear about communist countrys and other leftist countrys are false?
No, I believe we executed a good whopping number of such pukes as you.
not one of them is true? do you really belive that people didnt fear kim I or are you really fucking stupid?
Those who feared Kim Il Sung had something to hide, bourgeois *****es and such.
i sort of belive you arnt really a leftist but rather you just let shit pour out of your mouth like water over niagra falls for shock value
Sounds like a nice theory, maybe you should write a book.
I also wonder why a non-Leftist comes on a Leftist board and spams this idiocy when he is so obviously not up to debate me, almost equal to the mind of Stephen Hawking or RedStar. :lol:
scrap metal
17th June 2004, 05:05
NEWSFLASH
The casket that holds that man's remains came from my town.
We have been disgraced...again. (*we brought you Slipknot...I can't appologize enough)
elijahcraig
17th June 2004, 05:34
^ :lol: ^
Slipknot is horrible.
Guerrilla22
17th June 2004, 06:05
Yes, thank you apologizing for Slipknot. Being from Michigan, I apologize for Kid Rock.
elijahcraig
17th June 2004, 06:09
I feel like Jackson mississippi?
he should be shot for that song
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.