Log in

View Full Version : My plan my ideas my laws, whats your opinion? - its quite lo



komsomol
28th March 2002, 23:11
I thought I should write down my political ideas, and I have for once. It starts at the line.

If you dont agree or have something to add please reply, I enjoy critisicm. Sorry about my spelling.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

My view on politics has changed over the past years of my life, I allways was a thinker, I always used to ask the question "why?". Becuase I was so deep in thought I came to what I believe to be the correct conclusions, notice how I say "I believe" there so not to insult anybody at the start of this piece of writing as I will undoubtedly insult a lot of people during this portrait of my views and hope for this world.

Politics

My stance and my basic principles.

I have to say that I am very far to the left of the political spectrum, I am Communist. Now half the people reading this will be against me, because of the past actions of the more hardline "Communists", the past economic problems of the Soviet Union and the present ones of the Peoples Republic of China. To those people, fear not of the true communism, that is Liberal Communism. This is the most beautifull vision I have ever seen, a world of leftist thinking people with freedom, which the Communist countries before have lacked in some areas. If you take away peoples rights the you effectiveley decrease your support. I basically want extreme freedom in a Communist society.

Policies and plans for laws

1, Freedom of speech.

2, The right to do whatever with your own body as long as it does not effect other people in any way physically.

3, A limit to the amount a person can inherit from thier familly and other sources.

4, Voting compulsory.

5, The demolition of all types of aristocracy and indeed the Monarchy if there is one.

6, All land owned by the community, a small tax to be payed to the Community budget to have your own plot of land. Existing small land owners (normal garden sizes) wouldn't have to pay a tax along with farmers as long as they keep producing crops on this land, or using these pieces of land for cattle.

7, These titles to be outlawed:- Sir, Baron, Countess, Lord, Count, Your Honour etc.

8, Interviews with people every year from ages 10-20 to make sure they are not becoming right wing fascist morons, not racist, predujiced etc. The winning around of these people would be done logically, by asking them rationally why they have thier views, arguing against them etc. If they have an actual belief in thier views after the arguement has gotten to a point where they can't argue anymore, the person should be put into an asylum to be re-educated.

9, Better public services ;).

10, In schools

i, More emphasis on philosophy.
ii, Education to consist of critical analysis of past political systems and views.
iii, Private schools to be banned.

11, Workers rights to be expanded.

12, The abolishion of the death penalty.

13, Giving manslaughter a lesser time in jail than attempted murder.

14, Drugs laws to be abolished but an age limit on all drugs except for caffiene so people can be properley educated in the effects of these substances. All containers of these drugs to be clearly labeled with negative labels.

15, Immigragration laws abolished.

16, The upscaling of conventional weapons marginally but the complete abolishion of nuclear weapons.

17, "Green" laws to help the enviroment.

18, Massive scale increase in the number of wind turbines or solar panels depending on the location of the community.

19, Indepently run media as well as 1 hour a week Community program on tv.

20, The reformation of the economy to make it almost completeley self-suficent and independent.

21, New laws to smash any monopolies in the markets.

22, New laws to prevent big companies from existing and to prevent the ill treating of smaller suppliers by larger suppliers who deal with the consumer.

23, The protection of the various religions.

The political system

There would have to be a one party dictatorship for a few years after the revolution. This party's job would be to educate a generation of intelligent, leftist thinking people so that there would allways be a throughoutfully willing Community for communism.

When the party'y had done thier job there would be a democratic election. The goverment elected woul consist of two halves. One halve would be elected in much the same way as they are in the UK tody (albeit a lot smaller areas for electorates). The other halve would consist of trade union leaders.

flames of the flag
29th March 2002, 00:26
I agree with most of your policies, Moloch, but one thing i would change: you say that people would pay a small tax(#6), this implies the existence of money, and money is the problem. I think that any time money is involved it will undoubtedly result in capitalism, wich sucks. Money is what is keeping humans from the way they are supposed to be, it gives us greed. So i suggest that you rethink your policy on currency, there shouldn't be any.
-flames

bleed3r
29th March 2002, 04:50
i agree with flames' feedback, and also have some of my own to offer. preservation of all religions would surely lead to conflict, i.e. holy war, who gets the holy land, who's right and wrong, etc... it's one of the main causes of war today and throughout history as well. these communist ideals could only exist in a monoreligious or an atheistic society. i believe it was lenin who described religion as "the opiate of the masses"

tomunderm
29th March 2002, 09:07
Yeah no money dude and forced voting and forced meeting attendance like you have to be dead or trapped in a cave and EVERYBODY is member.

komsomol
29th March 2002, 09:53
I agree with all of you, the only problem is that I wouldn't know how to impliment them, I think that the complete abolishion of money would have to take a few years as this would complicate matters.

PunkRawker677
29th March 2002, 18:04
titles such as 'sir' etc. should not be abolished, just NOT encouraged. by doing this you are limiting people human right to think for themselves and act for themselves, if someone wants to call someone sir, let them.. and 're-educating' kids?? thats ridiculous.. let people think what they want.. just make sure the education system is excellent so they get the right point..

Anonymous
29th March 2002, 18:23
''8, Interviews with people every year from ages 10-20 to make sure they are not becoming right wing fascist morons, not racist, predujiced etc. The winning around of these people would be done logically, by asking them rationally why they have thier views, arguing against them etc. If they have an actual belief in thier views after the arguement has gotten to a point where they can't argue anymore, the person should be put into an asylum to be re-educated. ''

Interviewing them and reeducating them is kinda facist cappie isnt it. I Agree with all the rest, also you must abolish the 'stupid laws'.

Guest
29th March 2002, 20:15
The problem is that nobody will disagree with most of your goals and ideas, except the blatantly fascist notions of 4, 6 and 8, the useless semantical notions in 7, and the vain stance you take in limiting the size of corporations in 22.
Aside from that you leave things so broad that its impossible to disagree, for instance what do expanded public services, expanded workers rights and "green" laws entail. In principle everyone would support these things, but in practice policy entails more than broad stances, it is composed of specific measures.

komsomol
30th May 2002, 20:40
Quote: from PunkRawker677 on 6:04 pm on Mar. 29, 2002
're-educating' kids?? thats ridiculous.. let people think what they want.. just make sure the education system is excellent so they get the right point..


I would do this, in a way as to make them believe without forcefulness but with reason, with debating, don't you see, to have a democratic communism we have to make the people understand and see the reasoning behind our views, IT IS NOT JUST BRAINWASHING THEM. e.g. this is right. Its this is right because of this.

komsomol
30th May 2002, 20:46
Quote: from Guest on 8:15 pm on Mar. 29, 2002
The problem is that nobody will disagree with most of your goals and ideas, except the blatantly fascist notions of 4, 6 and 8, the useless semantical notions in 7, and the vain stance you take in limiting the size of corporations in 22.
Aside from that you leave things so broad that its impossible to disagree, for instance what do expanded public services, expanded workers rights and "green" laws entail. In principle everyone would support these things, but in practice policy entails more than broad stances, it is composed of specific measures.


I agree, I will draw up a more detailed manifesto some time, the problem is that the measures would have to be different given the economic and social conditions.

komsomol
30th May 2002, 20:52
Quote: from PunkRawker677 on 6:04 pm on Mar. 29, 2002
titles such as 'sir' etc. should not be abolished, just NOT encouraged. by doing this you are limiting people human right to think for themselves and act for themselves.


I meant abolished in the way that that would not be thier official title anymore, it wouldn't be against the law to call them that no, didn't I say freedom of speech?