Log in

View Full Version : Unions Strike Back



The Feral Underclass
3rd June 2004, 07:00
Blow to Livingstone as RMT calls Tube strike on polling day
By Barrie Clement, Labour Editor
03 June 2004

Miilitant union leaders dealt a damaging blow yesterday to Ken Livingstone's campaign to be re-elected as mayor of London when they called a 24-hour Tube strike on polling day. The stoppage on 10 June by the RMT transport union coincides with European Parliament and London mayoral polls and will cripple a system used by three million people a day.

It is understood that Bob Crow, the hard-left general secretary of the union, argued against the controversial date on the basis that it would be seen as "anti-democratic" and would undermine Mr Livingstone, one of the few left-wingers with any degree of power in Britain.

Mr Crow's advice was reportedly rejected by five votes to three after the RMT's national executive initially divided four-four on the issue.

There is little doubt the stoppage by several thousand signallers, maintenance and station staff will interfere with the electorate's ability to vote, but its significance is richly symbolic. Mr Crow said the 2,614 to 643 vote by RMT members was an "overwhelming mandate" for strike action but urged London Underground and private firms involved in maintaining the Tube to reopen negotiations urgently.

The union has rejected a 3 per cent pay rise and is seeking a "substantial" increase as well as a reduction in the working week.

Steve Norris, the Conservative candidate for London Mayor, argued that failure to stop the strike would be a damaging blow to Mr Livingstone's campaign. "Londoners who are frustrated and unable to travel that day will know where to put their crosses. This is a huge boost for our chances on 10 June . The RMT should drop the strike immediately."

Mr Livingstone said that the stoppage on election day was "unnecessary and unacceptable" and that the RMT should return to negotiations. The Liberal Democrat London mayoral candidate Simon Hughes accused Mr Crow of "holding London and democracy to ransom". He added: "This sort of industrial action does nobody in London any good. It is bad for Londoners, bad for London Underground and bad for the image of unions."

Meanwhile, further talks will be held today and tomorrow between the RMT and Network Rail in an attempt to avert strikes on the mainline railways in a separate dispute over pay, pensions and travel concessions.

* Union leaders yesterday accepted a peace deal aimed at ending the renewed firefighters' dispute. The executive of the Fire Brigades Union said the wording of a new agreement covering so-called "stand down time" - where employees are allowed to sleep on night shifts - was acceptable. A row over working blew up last month leading to the suspension of firefighters in Greater Manchester and a spate of unofficial action.

The Independent (http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/transport/story.jsp?story=527693)

Sideshow Luke Perry
3rd June 2004, 09:29
Anyone remember the last time a big Labour politician supported a strike?

I'm campaigning for Respect this time, and I sincerely hope all Union people disgusted at the attitude of "their" party do the same.

toastedmonkey
3rd June 2004, 14:22
The respect party has come up so many times, people always saying the same that, they are abonding labour and goign to respect.

Do they not realise that this undermines the left wing of the UK?

All respect are doing is taking voters and members away from labour, not the tories or lib dems. It will seriously damage the labour party, which might sound like a good thing, but it will allow the tories back in power.

These kind of parties come around time and time again, they never get anywhere, swp for example.

What all these "respect" people should be doing is joining the labour party and helping reclaim the working class party from the tories wearing red.

take it away kamo...

Hate Is Art
3rd June 2004, 15:34
hehe, I would rather support Labour then those cretins the SWP or RESPECT (find out what it means to me :D)

Kez
3rd June 2004, 18:30
Im actually holding a meeting in my local Labour Branch on Venezuela, hopefully will be able to win some people over, and raise money for Hands Off Venezuela.

I wonder if the SWP could do the same, with their 5 people in a branch who are already "socialists" anyway??? Seems a bit redundant, then again, its what happens when you dont work in the traditional organisations of the workers, u isolate urself, hence the term "secterian".

Without the workers we are nothing. SWP/RESPECT et al are nothing.
Lets not forget how in 1989 Militant had 10,000 members which it had won from the Labour Party. If you add ALL the main "socialist" parties now, you wouldnt get a third as much.

enjoy.