Log in

View Full Version : New orginazation?



lucid
1st June 2004, 14:27
-
While drinking my morning coffee I was thinking about how bad I hated communist and wondering what I could do to help rid the US of their filth. It dawned on me that we have the perfect parking space for these pinkies and it's only 90 miles off of the southern most point of Key West, Fl. So, as a result, I have registered the domain commiestocuba.org.

Here are my ideas;

Non profit orginization aimed at getting communist out of the great country of the United States of America. I don't really see anything politically incorrect about this since they hate the USA anyway.

Capitalist provided one-way transportation from the US to Cuba in exchange for the commie renouncing their US citizenship and signing of contract that states that the individual will stay in Cuba except for occasional US visits. Breach of contract will result in financial penalties.

I would like to know if any of my capitalist brothers would like to take part in the ground breaking orginization. I for one think that the sponsorship, and deportation, of a commie would be the best money I have ever spent.

redstar2000
1st June 2004, 14:58
Your idea has possibilities, Lucid, but it needs a bit of "tweaking".

There's no particular reason for Cuba to accept a wave of American commies...unless they bring a load of "hard currency" with them to spend. I suggest a grant of 10,000 to 20,000 euros per deportee...deposited in the Cuban State Bank. New arrivals would be able to draw out 50-100 euros a month...plenty enough to live on there.

A tropical wardrobe and a laptop computer (with spare parts) would also be essential.

I think with those added "perks", quite a few American commies would agree to emigrate.

In fact, I'll sign up as soon as you make the necessary arrangements.

gracias...

:redstar2000:

The Redstar2000 Papers (http://www.redstar2000papers.fightcapitalism.net)
A site about communist ideas

Commie Girl
1st June 2004, 15:17
Sounds great Lucid....luckily I live in a free country that doesnt restrict its citizens travels. :P

Fidelbrand
1st June 2004, 15:24
Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2004, 03:17 PM
Sounds great Lucid....luckily I live in a free country that doesnt restrict its citizens travels. :P
dido, Lucid.
I am also proud of my country dennouncing pre-emptive war too. Next time if you see a person you imagine a threat to you, shoot him right away with no questions ask, see if your democratic country voids you of being in jail with no questions asked ? :ph34r:

God bless your homeland, it needs prayers. :cuba:

lucid
1st June 2004, 15:25
Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2004, 03:17 PM
Sounds great Lucid....luckily I live in a free country that doesnt restrict its citizens travels. :P
Initially this would be available to US commies only. Maybe we can find a capitalist canadian that would interested in sponsoring a Canadian branch ctoc.org.

I am assuming that you are using the "cost nothing" definition when you say free.

lucid
1st June 2004, 15:32
Originally posted by Fidelbrand+Jun 1 2004, 03:24 PM--> (Fidelbrand @ Jun 1 2004, 03:24 PM)
[email protected] 1 2004, 03:17 PM
Sounds great Lucid....luckily I live in a free country that doesnt restrict its citizens travels. :P
dido, Lucid.
I am also proud of my country dennouncing pre-emptive war too. Next time if you see a person you imagine a threat to you, shoot him right away with no questions ask, see if your democratic country voids you of being in jail with no questions asked ? :ph34r:

God bless your homeland, it needs prayers. :cuba: [/b]
Next time I see a person gassing people in his neighborhood and torturing people that he doesn't agree with I will shoot him. Nice job with trying to make Saddam look like a victim. I am glad he's gone and glad we where able to help!

BTW - I am finishing reading Shake Hands with the Devil and had a question for you canadians. Seems like a lot of people were upset with the US's lack of action regarding Rwanda. Why does the left complain about us being in the war while also complaining about us not getting involved in past conflicts. It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't senario. I guess the protest warrior poster is dead on. Say yes to war... if a demacrat is president.

Commie Girl
1st June 2004, 15:38
That was an excellent book. The difference is that this was an action backed by the UN and most countries. If the U$ put as much effort into helping countries that really need it, they might gather some respect. Big difference between genocide and preemptive wars. Seems clear , no? ;)

lucid
1st June 2004, 15:42
Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2004, 03:38 PM
That was an excellent book. The difference is that this was an action backed by the UN and most countries. If the U$ put as much effort into helping countries that really need it, they might gather some respect. Big difference between genocide and preemptive wars. Seems clear , no? ;)
Yeah, it sure was back by the UN :rolleyes: That's why it failed. The UN, including the US, hardly helped at all. It did nothing but get in the way. Canada didn't have the means to handle the situation on their own. The US does have the means to handle Iraq on it's own. 12 years of your UN resolutions went by with nothing happening. This would of turned into another "but the US didn't do anything about iraq" cries in 5 years if the US would have sat around.

revolutionindia
1st June 2004, 16:34
hey Lucid
How about sending all those High IQ indians who
are working in NASA and also the tech guys back.

My country needs them
They all left at a time when thiings weren't so great in INdia.
But things have changed now

I wonder why they do not return
Probably
they are still trying to live up the
The Great American Illusion :rolleyes:

Pedro Alonso Lopez
1st June 2004, 18:33
Great idea, remove the opposition, a clear sign of your fear that maybe just maybe one day people will come to their ideas.

lucid
1st June 2004, 18:57
Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2004, 06:33 PM
Great idea, remove the opposition, a clear sign of your fear that maybe just maybe one day people will come to their ideas.
I fear communism like I fear a mosquito. More annoying than anything else.

I think it's a great idea. There is a country, close to the US, that closely resembles your idea of a perfect society. Why even consider trying to change a giant like the US when you can just move to a place thats already setup.

BOZG
1st June 2004, 19:09
Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2004, 04:38 PM
The difference is that this was an action backed by the UN and most countries.


That's irrelevant. The UN is an imperialist organisation. Opposition to war is based on class interests, not on which nation or what organisation supports it.

lucid
1st June 2004, 19:32
Originally posted by BornOfZapatasGuns+Jun 1 2004, 07:09 PM--> (BornOfZapatasGuns @ Jun 1 2004, 07:09 PM)
[email protected] 1 2004, 04:38 PM
The difference is that this was an action backed by the UN and most countries.


That's irrelevant. The UN is an imperialist organisation. Opposition to war is based on class interests, not on which nation or what organisation supports it. [/b]
Yeah, it's not like we need your permission to behave like imperialist pigs.

Louis Pio
1st June 2004, 19:35
Yeah, it's not like we need your permission to behave like imperialist pigs.

Yes, so please don't whine next time you face the consequences (terrorism etc). Thanks in advance

lucid
1st June 2004, 19:41
Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2004, 07:35 PM

Yeah, it's not like we need your permission to behave like imperialist pigs.

Yes, so please don't whine next time you face the consequences (terrorism etc). Thanks in advance
I guess I need to point it out when I am being sarcastic. I will not whine about the next act of terrorism as long as you don't whine when the US military goes and kicks the shit out of the sponsoring state.

Thanks

Louis Pio
1st June 2004, 20:03
I guess I need to point it out when I am being sarcastic. I will not whine about the next act of terrorism as long as you don't whine when the US military goes and kicks the shit out of the sponsoring state.



Well I wouldn't whine about that but rather explain the reasons of why you do it.
Because the USA only attack certain Terroist sponsoring states and leave others. So the question is in my oppinion not that of getting rid of terrorism but have other reasons.

And yes it's hard knowing when you are sarcastic considering the huge amount of time you use on this site and the huge difference in the quality of your posts.

lucid
1st June 2004, 20:09
Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2004, 08:03 PM

I guess I need to point it out when I am being sarcastic. I will not whine about the next act of terrorism as long as you don't whine when the US military goes and kicks the shit out of the sponsoring state.



Well I wouldn't whine about that but rather explain the reasons of why you do it.
Because the USA only attack certain Terroist sponsoring states and leave others. So the question is in my oppinion not that of getting rid of terrorism but have other reasons.

And yes it's hard knowing when you are sarcastic considering the huge amount of time you use on this site and the huge difference in the quality of your posts.
You'll have to excuse the quality of some of my post. This is kinda like my punching bag :P Sometimes I get on and am tired and just rant.

Anyways, you mentioned that we only attack "certain terrorist sponsering states". I guess if we don't attack all of them we should just leave them alone. Lets do that with criminals to. Since we can't get all of them lets just let them run wild. I think the main reason we went after Saddam was because of the threat that the US felt after 9/11. I am sure that Bush was aware of certain 'perks' that would go along with invading Iraq but I don't think there is some big conspiracy. I dunno, maybe my tin foil hat isn't working.
--------------------------------------------
Also please understand that some of the pro-commie posts here are so pathetic that I can't help but reply with stupid responses.

cubist
2nd June 2004, 13:17
can't we just majke all imperialist meat heads join the army good ol cannon fodder, if they wanna support the war they can go and fight it

Osman Ghazi
2nd June 2004, 20:00
Yeah, it sure was back by the UN That's why it failed. The UN, including the US, hardly helped at all. It did nothing but get in the way. Canada didn't have the means to handle the situation on their own. The US does have the means to handle Iraq on it's own. 12 years of your UN resolutions went by with nothing happening. This would of turned into another "but the US didn't do anything about iraq" cries in 5 years if the US would have sat around.


I'm not sure if you are aware of this, but there is a slight difference between Iraq and Rwanda. In Iraq, the U$ supported the genocide by providing the arms to make it possible. Then they said, "Oh, jeez, he's sure done some bad stuff" and invaded when it also happened to serve their economic interests. In Rwanda, while the genocide was occuring, the U$ simply did nothing when they could have done something.

Nas
2nd June 2004, 20:24
are the "communists" really a threat to USA , right now? nah

i say "communists" because i think most of the people who claim to be communist are not really communists


those "communists", i believe are the annoying ones

Don't Change Your Name
3rd June 2004, 03:30
Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2004, 02:27 PM
Non profit orginization
A weird thing coming from a cappie.

Nice utopia, about getting rid of the opposition. How democratic.

Monty Cantsin
3rd June 2004, 04:57
Originally posted by [email protected] 1 2004, 06:57 PM
I fear communism like I fear a mosquito.
did you know a mosquito can kill you?