What countries will the United States invade next?

[Cobra]

I could be wrong, but it looks like the United States has started a new World War. Bush’s “Axis of Evil” included Iraq, Iran, and North Korea. So I have a strong feeling that Iran and North Korea will be invaded. Recently, sanctions have been imposed on Syria, so I’m guessing they will be attacked. Also, Cuba and Venezuela are obvious targets, for ideological reasons.

So here’s the list in order of first that will be invaded to last to be invaded.

1. Iran
2. Syria
3. North Korea?
4. Venezuela
5. Cuba

I put a question mark next to North Korea because I think North Korea might agree to temporarily “end” its weapons programs to receive more aid, as it has done in the past.

How accurate is my list? What other countries might the United States invade?

[revolutionindia]

How about pakistan?

By the way I think america's cultural imperliasm is more dangeorus than
its wars .

The culture of a country is the heart and soul of the civilization and by attacking that america will succed in capturing countries even without
waging war.

That needs to be prevented

[mEds]

In that case than Europe and Asia have already been taken over. The only continent really left un-cultivated to a significant extent is Africa, excluding South Africa and maybe Egypt/Morocco.

However, American imperialism is still seeping into Africa, Ghana is probably going to be the next victim.

[Morpheus]

How about pakistan?

Pakistan is a loyal satellite state. If there's an invasion it'll be to prop up the US puppet government against a revolt. I doubt the US will be launching a full fledged military invasion of any other country while it's fighting the insurgency in Iraq. Stretches rescources. Smaller interventions may happen, though. Syria is probably next on Washington's hit list.

[pedro san pedro]

the us has well and truely got its hands full at the moment in iraq - nd they are not going to be able to leave there soon.

its going to be along while until the situation is "secure" enough for them to withdrawl.

also, with the level of attention focused internationally, they are going to have to clean up after themselves, unlike afganistian.

[Fidelbrand]

The whole world is already invaded by the huge capitalist machine... what else can we want more?

[monkeydust]

I can't see them directly invading another country any time soon, certainly not within the next 5 years or so.

In any case, the UK won't join in next time, Blair barely had the support of half the country for Iraq, moreover, back then it was assumed that there were weapons of mass desruction in Iraq. The public will not condone another invasion, not within 10-15 years I reckon.

If the U.S was to pick another country, I'd hazard a guess at Syria.

[John Galt]

You forgot Canada, Mexico and the UK.

[redfront]

I'd go for Cuba... Castro is not getting any younger.

[Cobra]

It does seem likely that the US will invade Syria. And if Syria gets taken over, Lebanon will probably be annexed by Israel.

The whole world is already invaded by the huge capitalist machine
I see your point. But some countries have resisted being taken over by foreign corporations. In order for American business to gain a foothold in those countries, the US military often gets involved. The US military may invade the so-called “rogue nations” in order for US corporations to dominate them.

But your right in assuming that it isn’t always necessary to invade another country in order to control them. The US could give weapons and funding to rebel groups who support the US and then install a pro-US dictator.

[Intifada]

i think the next target will be syria. however, they won't be able to invade it just yet. the iraqi resistance is making life harder and harder for coalition troops and will cause problems for a few years to come, in my opinion.

i don't think america will openly attack cuba. they may wait for castro to die before making a decision on what to do about their "unfriendly" neighbour.

[DSCH]

http://moderncrusader.blogspot.com/

[Nas]

CUba is an insect compare to the USA , there is no need to invade Cuba , thats why the USA has the CIA for.

you people are forgeting how strong the CIA is.


ps: im not taking any sides but that is a fact

[Fidelbrand]

Originally posted by [email protected] 16 2004, 06:47 PM
It does seem likely that the US will invade Syria. And if Syria gets taken over, Lebanon will probably be annexed by Israel.

The whole world is already invaded by the huge capitalist machine
I see your point. But some countries have resisted being taken over by foreign corporations. In order for American business to gain a foothold in those countries, the US military often gets involved. The US military may invade the so-called “rogue nations” in order for US corporations to dominate them.

But your right in assuming that it isn’t always necessary to invade another country in order to control them. The US could give weapons and funding to rebel groups who support the US and then install a pro-US dictator.
yes comrade cobra, you right right too.

i also think military action for the sake of upholding wanky yankee liberal/representative democracy in order to facilitate the full fuck of capitalism is a possiblity too (for those 3rd world country not yet capitalised/exploited).

Cuba is a piece of meat for the U.S., near in geo distance, riped in a sense because of Miami worms sending letters back home say how much they are nejoying in Miami... When Granny Castro dies, Us might invade Cuba as I aforementioned, -----&#62; for the sake of upholding wanky yankee liberal/representative democracy in order to facilitate the full fuck of capitalism <_<

[Professor Moneybags]

Originally posted by [email protected] 16 2004, 07:44 AM
How about pakistan?

By the way I think america&#39;s cultural imperliasm is more dangeorus than
its wars .

The culture of a country is the heart and soul of the civilization and by attacking that america will succed in capturing countries even without
waging war.
Maybe children are embracing American culture because yours sucks.

Let&#39;s face it; caste systems, dressing women like ninjas and shooting men whose beards are the wrong length Vs. McDonalds and Coca Cola is only a dilema to an insane multiculturalist.

[redfront]

Originally posted by [email protected] 16 2004, 10:07 PM
CUba is an insect compare to the USA , there is no need to invade Cuba , thats why the USA has the CIA for.

you people are forgeting how strong the CIA is.


ps: im not taking any sides but that is a fact
Cuba may be small but it&#39;s yet socialistic and that&#39;s a pain in the butt for the U&#036;.

[Louis Pio]

Regarding Venezuela I don&#39;t think the USA will try a direct invasion. They will more likely use Colombia for that purpose. The USA has their hands full in Iraq and the situation are not improveing but rather the opposite. Also an invasion in Venezuela would be quite difficault because of the overwelming support for the Chavez government. If Chavez arms the Venezuelan people it would be the best way to fight against such attempts.

[Daniel Karssenberg]

Experts say it may take them 40 years to fully democratise and stabilise Iraq, it is not in their own interest to invade yet anotehr country. Their goal is to enforce American democracy, in order to let Iraq be a example in the region and an example for the Fundamentalists in that region.

[Osman Ghazi]

Maybe children are embracing American culture because yours sucks.


My daddy can beat up your daddy.

[Purple]

George W. Bush had spoken something about US pressure on Cuba... But even dough I dont think anything will happen there for a while im pretty confident that something is going to happen eventually...

[Purple]

http://www.che-lives.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=24647

[emmissary]

Syria
N. Korea
Cuba

[Daniel Karssenberg]

Now please look outside of the common and one-sided American capitalist and imperialist mentality, and think what would really be their interest in taking over other countries before having Iraq stabilised or suit to their will.

[pyrrhassorrow]

Originally posted by [email protected] 16 2004, 05:07 PM
CUba is an insect compare to the USA , there is no need to invade Cuba , thats why the USA has the CIA for.

you people are forgeting how strong the CIA is.


ps: im not taking any sides but that is a fact
Cuba may be an insect in size compared to the U.S. but there are reasons why the U.S. would invade. They have been terrified of Castro since the revolution. They are an evil imperialist country who bully&#39;s everyone and along comes Castro and basically spits in their face. Once he is out of power though I do believe they will make a play. Why do you think they wanted Haiti? Now they have Cuba surrounded.

I don&#39;t think they&#39;d invade Canada but they know they don&#39;t have to be here physically to control our gov&#39;t.

[Comrade Hector]

I believe either Iran or Syria will be next. Not only are they so-called "rogue states" but both neighbor Iraq. In my opinion it would be convenient for the US to "stabilize" the Near East first from the "harboring of terrorists" before moving into the other "rogue states" in other parts of the globe. North Korea has the ability to defend themselves against any US attack, so I don&#39;t believe they will be attacked anytime soon. It is only because they posses nuclear weapons that North Korea can put up good resistance to the USA. Could be why Bill Clinton pulled back his plan to attack North Korea in the early 1990&#39;s.

[Salvador Allende]

North Korea has now pledged any aid neccesary to help Syria and Cuba, thus, they are now safe IMO from US imperialism as the US is scared to death of Democratic Korea. Now the US is left with one choice left, Iran.

[NYC4Ever]

Goodness, the US is not going to invade any more countries especially with this kind of heat on them about Iraq. Get your Alex Jones stories straight or just throw them out the window. Noam Chomsky is not your savior, and the UN does not hold authority anymore.
I mean how well off is North Korea? Honestly the country has been ravgaged by a totalitarian regime masked as this utopian dream that a radical Jew had in the 1800&#39;s. The attempt flourished through several white guys, then flew down to Asia and hit Latin America as well. Your catchy slogans and neat effigies do not work anymore than your mind bending philosophies that twirl any sort of truth and moral code a decent human being may have, to sell a torn broken dream. Give it up. Consume your energy into doing something productive for your lives instead of embarrassing your parents. Go "exploit" some workers. Go get "exploited".

[Purple]

ive started thinking of an blockade of the united states... its a ridiclus thought but they seem to have no respect for anyone anymore, so everybody gets pissed, and BOOM, the rest of the world makes a blockade on the us, drowning refugees tryign to get overseas, etc etc.... stupid thought, stupid post... sorry...

[revolutionindia]

I agree a blockade is what is required .

We can survive without America and america&#39;s economy

All asian nations and african countries should join hands under NAM
and put an economic blockade on U.S

Imagine this headline
"India and somalia impose sanctions on United state of America" :lol: :lol: ;)

[Commie Girl]

:lol: good one india&#33; I agree with the blockade idea&#33;

[Fidelbrand]

Originally posted by lost [email protected] 18 2004, 06:38 AM
George W. Bush had spoken something about US pressure on Cuba... But even dough I dont think anything will happen there for a while im pretty confident that something is going to happen eventually...
Probably nothing will happen to Cuba, because.....

Fidel will live for 140 years. (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040517/481/hav10105171817)

[lucid]

Originally posted by Osman [email protected] 17 2004, 10:26 PM

Maybe children are embracing American culture because yours sucks.


My daddy can beat up your daddy.
Your probably right. Getting three square meals a day has it&#39;s benifits.

[Professor Moneybags]

Originally posted by [email protected] 19 2004, 01:15 PM
I agree a blockade is what is required .

We can survive without America and america&#39;s economy

All asian nations and african countries should join hands under NAM
and put an economic blockade on U.S

Imagine this headline
"India and somalia impose sanctions on United state of America" :lol: :lol: ;)
Blockading the hand that feeds you. Not such a smart move.

[revolutionindia]

Originally posted by Professor Moneybags+May 19 2004, 10:17 PM--> (Professor Moneybags &#064; May 19 2004, 10:17 PM)
[email protected] 19 2004, 01:15 PM
I agree a blockade is what is required .

We can survive without America and america&#39;s economy

All asian nations and african countries should join hands under NAM
and put an economic blockade on U.S

Imagine this headline
"India and somalia impose sanctions on United state of America" :lol: :lol: ;)
Blockading the hand that feeds you. Not such a smart move. [/b]
Who says america feeds us

india has the resources and has a market of 1.1 billion people
we can be self sufficient and are happy with what we have

its the americans who want market access

Wants to turn us into a nation of
mindless consumers of american goods and services

And

Provide slave labour answering american calls and
doing mediocre tech jobs
I say ban outsourcing you will be doing us a favor

[lucid]

Originally posted by revolutionindia+May 19 2004, 05:45 PM--> (revolutionindia &#064; May 19 2004, 05:45 PM)
Originally posted by Professor [email protected] 19 2004, 10:17 PM

[email protected] 19 2004, 01:15 PM
I agree a blockade is what is required .

We can survive without America and america&#39;s economy

All asian nations and african countries should join hands under NAM
and put an economic blockade on U.S

Imagine this headline
"India and somalia impose sanctions on United state of America" :lol: :lol: ;)
Blockading the hand that feeds you. Not such a smart move.
Who says america feeds us

india has the resources and has a market of 1.1 billion people
we can be self sufficient and are happy with what we have

its the americans who want market access

Wants to turn us into a nation of
mindless consumers of american goods and services

And

Provide slave labour answering american calls and
doing mediocre tech jobs
I say ban outsourcing you will be doing us a favor [/b]
I love the fact that this guy thinks we are turning other nations into "mindless consumers of American goods", I live in the US and would have a hard time finding something actually made in the USA. Maybe you meant to say mindless consumers of American inventions.

One more thing. I wish they would ban outsourcing to India. Can&#39;t understand a fucking word your saying. Talk to damn fast. Lay off the khat.

[Misodoctakleidist]

It&#39;s made for the USA by everyone else. How much of the money you spend on products "made in China" goes to the American share-holders who own the manufacturer?

[Louis Pio]

Lay off the khat.

You are just so full of shit that it has to come out ehh? Your a sad person Lucid.
Anyway come with one of your counteremarks that displays you lack of brain, they always makes me laugh.

[Touchstone]

Lucid, I think all of us here get three square meals a day. The thing we should worry about is that MILLIONS OF PEOPLE DON"T. Dont be a narrow-minded selfish fool. Definatly Pakistan. We need more of foothold in the Middile East.

[refuse_resist]

Pakistan will never be attacked because Musharaff is now Bush&#39;s new slave and has helped them alot on the war of terror. Chances are the next countries who will be attacked by the U.&#036;. imperialist are Iran, Syria, Cuba or Venezuela. As far as North Korea goes, its hard to say what might happen there. If Bush does get reelected, the draft will be reinstated and it&#39;s only obvious what he has planned.

[DaCuBaN]

Their goal is to enforce American democracy

And it pretty much sums the whole thing up - their goal is to enforce an oxymoron :rolleyes: :lol:

When will america learn: it&#39;s got the damn cake, now eat it and leave us alone already&#33; Europe is almost entirely americanised, Israel is america - it shocked me how alike Jerusalem was (in culture) and India is well on the way there with the amount of capital investment being poured into it. Capitalism won the war - there is no doubt. It&#39;s now a matter of persuading them to start feeding on the spoils, and allow things to take their course toward a brave new world

[Daniel Karssenberg]

I might be, according to you "americandised", in my country I am free to protest, free to write and free to move, and when reached the proper age free to vote.

[Nas]

i think you have your terms confused :



Democracy and Dictatorship



Capitalism and Socialism

[Fidelbrand]

Originally posted by Daniel [email protected] 20 2004, 09:51 PM
I might be, according to you "americandised", in my country I am free to protest, free to write and free to move, and when reached the proper age free to vote.
Daniel,

free to hold protests that are not being heard or addressed seriously?
free to write anything accept persuading anyone towards the idea of communism?
free to move counter-reactionaries to capitalism out of their homes? (www.raisethefist.com)
free to vote ,but, situation of exploitation unchanged?

[Big Mike]

This question might be better put as, what country SHOULD the USA attack next?

Even as liberal thinkers ... you have to see evil that needs to be dealt with ... for the benefit of the enslaved peoples of those lands.

What the goal should be is NOT to keep the USA from invading countires and removing dictators from power ... but making sure there is justifiable reasons to do so before the invasion. Oppressed peoples need help from &#39;outside&#39; ... and they always have.

Saddam was a murderer, dictator, and deserved to be taken out. I don&#39;t think anyone sees him as good ... for the Iraqi people.

I don&#39;t see many countries in that state right now, except North Korea ... and a few of the smaller countires in Africa. Cuba is okay ... and is headed for change in the next decade ... Columiba is trying it&#39;s best to stand up to the drug lords ... Syria knows it&#39;s the last of the middle-east countries to support terrorism (officially) ... and it will change soon too. And major communist countires, like The People&#39;s Republic are embracing various forms of capitialism as we speak.

[themessiah]

Canada

and then Mexico

and then Alaska

because they&#39;re fucking stupid

[cubist]

america is most like to invade palestine&#33;&#33;&#33;, syria, libya, north korea in a few years america needs more money/support for that one it will be messy, possibly parts of africa

[themessiah]

america should invade THE CUBE

ever see it?

its got the new DAX in it in like boxer shorts.

you cyber geeks should enjoy that

I almost did

[revolutionindia]

Originally posted by lucid+May 19 2004, 11:47 PM--> (lucid @ May 19 2004, 11:47 PM)
Originally posted by [email protected] 19 2004, 05:45 PM

Originally posted by Professor [email protected] 19 2004, 10:17 PM

[email protected] 19 2004, 01:15 PM
I agree a blockade is what is required .

We can survive without America and america&#39;s economy

All asian nations and african countries should join hands under NAM
and put an economic blockade on U.S

Imagine this headline
"India and somalia impose sanctions on United state of America" :lol: :lol: ;)
Blockading the hand that feeds you. Not such a smart move.
Who says america feeds us

india has the resources and has a market of 1.1 billion people
we can be self sufficient and are happy with what we have

its the americans who want market access

Wants to turn us into a nation of
mindless consumers of american goods and services

And

Provide slave labour answering american calls and
doing mediocre tech jobs
I say ban outsourcing you will be doing us a favor
I love the fact that this guy thinks we are turning other nations into "mindless consumers of American goods", I live in the US and would have a hard time finding something actually made in the USA. Maybe you meant to say mindless consumers of American inventions.

One more thing. I wish they would ban outsourcing to India. Can&#39;t understand a fucking word your saying. Talk to damn fast. Lay off the khat. [/b]
My dear friend lucid

I have never wished ill of anyone
but what I am going to say is in your best interests.

Only bitter medicine will cure the cancer of capitalism

to you all I can say is
I hope you lose your job to outsourcing

Only then you will know
how heartless capitalism is in
its search for more profits and more efficiency.

This will do you some good and you can use
the spare time you get while you are unemployed
to catch up with marx

God bless you