View Full Version : MIM wont do it?!
Raisa
16th May 2004, 05:33
I heard that the MIM is puritanistic and advocates celibacy from a number of people on these boards. Is that true? Talk to meh!
I bet mao wasnt no celibate! ;)
Salvador Allende
16th May 2004, 05:34
the MIM is actually a radical sect of the Maoist movement and is generally looked down upon as near-Khruschovist revisionists by the movement as a whole.
Raisa
16th May 2004, 05:36
Originally posted by Salvador
[email protected] 16 2004, 05:34 AM
the MIM is actually a radical sect of the Maoist movement and is generally looked down upon as near-Khruschovist revisionists by the movement as a whole.
Ah. Thank you for that information.
As for the wrest of you.....talk to meh!
Guest1
16th May 2004, 06:39
Originally posted by
[email protected] 16 2004, 12:36 AM
Ah. Thank you for that information.
As for the wrest of you.....talk to meh!
They are utterly nuts andI wouldn't be surprised if they were one of the first experiments in democratic justice when the revolution comes.
They believe bisexuality and homosexuality are "bourgeois excess".
Raisa
16th May 2004, 07:14
They know they want to! :P <_< "no we dont"........ :rolleyes: yes you do!
Some ones got to show me where they actually say these things.
revolutionindia
16th May 2004, 07:27
Look I know this sounds so bullshitty to you people but abstinence has
its pro's and con's.
Sex is just another need like food,water,shelter etc
Its not the centre of my universe.
Anyway I have read up come ancient sanskrit literature and I believe by
not enaging in sex and masturbation you will conserve your chi which
in turn helps you in numerous ways .
Look dont laugh its not funny
The greatest example of such a person who did this was Mahtma Gandhi
Mahatma gandhi was a hardcore fanatic when it came to abstinence.
Initially he was married and was all into sex etcetc
Later on due to some circumstnces he changed and took a vow not to do it again.
he reached such a level that he even performed various
bizarre experiments like sleeping naked with his naked teenage
niece to test himself.
he passed with flying colours .
He induced a state of impotency in himself
When the indian public came to know this there was a big hue and cry.
But it died down because he was after all gandhi.
I believe he derived a lot of mental strength by not thinking and indulging in the
act.
That could ahve been one of the reasons for his sucess
with satyagraha
I have tried it also and believe me at my age its very difficult and I have not
been able to cross 6 months. :D
I have still got a long way to go.
I find the american obsession with sex bizarre
I believe americans have their first sexual encounter when they are
as young as 15 /16 years.
Thats bad you know because at age you are not exactly mentally prepared
to have sex.
The after effects of such encounters spill over into your later life and
thats why the american familiy systems are breaking down.
promiscious beahviour should be avoided.
you have a choice you either learn to control the organ between your legs or
allow the organ between your legs to control you
Coitus urges start during the first signs of puberty. It is biologically necessary for humans to engage in sex and to transmit our genetic material so the species can survive. Sex etc, is also a good way to "fight" the growing trends of obesity; especially in America. If America did not have that than more people would die from heart attacks. Although one might not be mentally prepared one must learn eventually. And what about arranged marriages in India where pre-teens engage in sex? We are genetically programmed to hunger for this.
Also, a logical person knows how to control their urges; like hunger, rage, violence and even hate. The problem is people are so varied with drugs/emotions/ailments that it creates a negative flux in world societies. And yes, a fifteen year-old can experience love; there are some very smart teenagers; and dumb ones as well. That is why it is better to not make assumptions.
revolutionindia
16th May 2004, 07:37
And what about arranged marriages in India where pre-teens engage in sex? We are genetically programmed to hunger for this.
Arranged marriage means that both the bride and bridegroom do not know each other and their marriage is arranged by the parents.
the don not engage in sex before marriage becasue thye would have obviously not
met each other
I think you are refering to child marriage where children aged 12-13 are
married forcibly .
This is a social evil and is prevealant in only the most underdeveloped
parts of the continent.
The government has made it a legally punishable offence and these cases ahve reduced
It's still fairly un-natural and to some extent biologically un-healthy to not engage in some sort of sexual satisfaction.
revolutionindia
16th May 2004, 07:52
Originally posted by
[email protected] 16 2004, 01:09 PM
It's still fairly un-natural and to some extent biologically un-healthy to not engage in some sort of sexual satisfaction.
I agree but there's no gain without pain
If giving up my drive for sex and momentary pleasure will help me in serving
my people better,Then let it be
The bliss and happiness you get from serving people lasts forever
Who needs 10 seconds of momentary pleasure?
You have no idea what clarity of mind you will be able to achieve if
you focus your thoughts away from sex and women .
Even when you are not thinking consciously about sex&women its in your
subconscious where the problems lurk.
Tackle your sub conscious mind first
Recently in a movie I heard some when say that men think of sex every 8 or 18 seconds .I am not sure
If thats correct thats an awful lot of time wasted for nothing
Sexual satisfaction does not just give 10 seconds of pleasure... Being sexually active also stimulates mental growth and hormones in your body which can alleviate stress, raise testosterone/estrogen levels and it connects you with others emotionally/humanly. While pretty much anything overdone is wrong/waste. Money? Power? Food? Sex is also a playful activity and helps link the sexes together.
Raisa
16th May 2004, 08:25
Originally posted by
[email protected] 16 2004, 07:27 AM
Look dont laugh its not funny
The greatest example of such a person who did this was Mahtma Gandhi
Mahatma gandhi was a hardcore fanatic when it came to abstinence.
I heard Ghandhi drank his own piss.
Is this true? Talk to meh!
I'm fairly certain he did but not for some sicko reason.
revolutionindia
16th May 2004, 08:42
there were a lot of people who drank their own piss and cow urine in india.
Its supposed to be antibaterial and I am surer it had a some medicinal benefits which are not know to me
This was done at a time when there were no modern mediciines.
Some people still do it today but they are very few in number
revolutionindia
16th May 2004, 08:48
Sexual satisfaction does not just give 10 seconds of pleasure
i was refering to the duration of an orgasm :D
elijahcraig
16th May 2004, 15:11
They believe bisexuality and homosexuality are "bourgeois excess".
No they don’t.
antieverything
16th May 2004, 17:07
Actually MIM advocates celibacy because they believe all (heterosexual or "gay") sex within patriarchy is rape. This is to say that the only good sex is lesbian sex. This really isn't all that rare of an idea on the radical feminist fringe.
Guest1
16th May 2004, 19:46
Uhh, I was under the impression they looked down upon all sex, especially homosexual sex....
I think I was wrong though, they are obviously into radical unmarxist gender sectarianism.
Here's some of their real crazy stuff though, about one of their mags:
Explores the claim of most "revolutionary" groups that Amerika's white workers are exploited. MIM harbors no such illusions. Huge subsidies from the Third World have created the most reactionary working class in history.
This one really pisses me off:
1996 MIM Congress
Resolution Re-Wording Policy against Sleeping with Recruits
No matter what, lower and higher level members will have to agree not to get involved romantically with RCs, MSGs, or recruitable circles or any person that has broken with the Party and refuses to struggle, yet looks to discredit the Party. The Party can dictate to the comrade conditions with specific people. We are not date counselors, but want to minimize external damage. This is possible in the same sense that the bourgeois professional world knows one shouldn't sleep with one's clients. In our case, the masses are wrong to demand that we not sleep with people, but the point is that our recruits are pre-scientific anyway and not yet able to judge the relative importance of lifestyle and cardinal questions. That is in addition to usual romance culture irrationality.
MCs who do get involved with RCs, MSGs or recruitable circles will inform the party and surrender their vote. They will also inform their partner in each case that they do not represent the party.
For the purposes of interpreting the resolutions of the late August 1996 mini-congress, "recruitable circles" are people who have shown some political activity on anti-militarism or anti-imperialism or perhaps some other group-related oppression.
Basically says, don't sleep with anyoen who could possibly fight against capitalism or you lose your vote! Fuckin' idiotic.
I recall there was a sight with much more extensive and exhaustive list of their views, but this is the only site of theirs I could find. I'll look for it later.
http://www.etext.org/Politics/MIM/
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.