Log in

View Full Version : People with Exceptionalities & Community



pandora
14th May 2004, 05:12
Quote from Redstar 2000: [sent privately to post here]
"Communism is about liberation from wage-slavery...it means we guide our lives without having to worry about having enough to eat, a roof over our heads, clothes to wear, etc. We are, consequently, "autonomous" to a degree unprecedented in human history...but what will life be like for those who literally can't be autonomous? Who require someone's help for even the most basic necessities?
How can you "decide" what to wear or what to eat if your "care-giver" has other ideas? How can you "participate" in a collective if you are unable to think?
Everything I've written on the subject of communism presupposes a society run by and for people of normal (or better) intelligence...and at least sufficient physical wellness to "look after themselves".
The problem of the seriously disabled, therefore, really stumps me."

Pandora:****Sorry to spoil the party but this limiting ways of thinking. The theories exposed here only relate to what has been written by the white man, when you talk about communal principals as have been expoused by native communities from the local community in North America, to Brazil, and the Mayan the idea of community in the Revolution against oppression is very different than what you have described. More often it speaks about communal lands, communal fishing rights, and the ability to work together as a tribe or community.

I am coming from a meeting with Native people here where I live and the idea of self-efficiency that you espouse here is wrong. Almost all native societies, particularly in the Americas, but also in Japan, etc. point to a community that works together, and where everyone and everything is part of a system that works together towards a whole, where no one is seperate.

When you make your remarks regarding the elderly and disabled as to efficiency, in a trually communal society the elders and those who in the Great Plains were seen as owned by the "Great Spirit" who you may see as suffering from Down Syndrome were regarded as special and held with reverence of a wisdom that went through and beyond this world. When you take away what such people give to a society, you deplete a society, ho.

What needs to happen in any Communist society that is going to function is we need to get away from thinking only by the White Man's logic or we're going to kill this planet. It is no mistake that wherever the logic of the White Man goes that his culture teaches him to take past what is sustainable harvest and cheat others out of what is sustainable to them [Iraq, etc.]

This relates to the conversation about people with disabilities as well. If a society stops being selfish in it's intention and creates acts that are self-sustaining and community inspiring than they soon find that the disabled, children and elderly tend to bring community around them. The goals of these groups tend to build community, whereas selfish goals for self and towards isolation, break down community and all that is worth truly being alive for is the conflict that we as a human race need to consider and get past to survive.

b]Communism to me is about community[/b],it is about recognizing that we are all threads in the carpet, and that we only become truly human in any true sense when we serve others. People with exceptionalities [disabilities], children and elderly people give us such a gift, first with their wisdom. All three groups tend to be more in touch with their bodies, more in touch with the earth, and more concerned with here and now, for children out of curiosity, but for the other two groups because they know they may not be here tomorrow and every day is a blessing.

Often due to the crap people with even severe disabilities have to go through on a daily basis, they are more open to people who are different like themselves. I have found great acceptance among the people in the disabled community when the regular community could not relate to me, because they were not relating to the person only their perception.

When we are forced to depend on others we bring out their kindness. This is the greatest gift we can give another human being, therefore people with disabities, elderly and children should be honored citizens in our community. :P

The Feral Underclass
14th May 2004, 13:55
This post is very confusing, at least to me.

I think you misunderstand the concept of autonomous. The idea of being autonomous is to have the power and freedom to effect changes and make decisions concering your life, but within your community and society not seperate to it.

I can not distinguish what is your opinion and what is not...sorry?

redstar2000
14th May 2004, 17:51
Here is the problem with the "communitarian" approach that Pandora speaks of.

In "communities", people won't mind their own damn business!

You will have no privacy!

People will nag you endlessly; do this, don't do that, blah, blah, blah!

And "God" help you if you have a new idea...about anything!

I have but little knowledge of Native American life; but the oppressiveness of small town American life has been widely chronicled. Yes, they have "community"...but it's impossible to breathe!

The pressures to conform to "community standards" create a stifling atmosphere.

Why do you think bright, rebellious kids take off for New York or San Francisco? And when they arrive, almost regardless of the difficulties they encounter, they feel a "sense of liberation"? There's no one looking over their shoulder giving them a running commentary on their "deficiencies"!


When we are forced to depend on others we bring out their kindness.

Sometimes. But sometimes their kindness is of the wrong kind.

I recently found myself in a position of (temporary) "forced dependence" on others...and I hated it! The feelings of uncertainty and worry were so great as to nearly immobilize me. I found myself becoming passive and indifferent to everything. It was horrible!

Of course, that's me. I've certainly heard other people say often enough that they "like" the feeling of being "taken care of", "looked after", etc.

But consider the seriously disabled. If we could offer them a real choice between the continuation of their dependence on others and a "cure" sufficient to allow them to become fully autonomous, what would they choose?

My contention is that the desire for personally autonomy is so deeply ingrained into the human (and animal) organism...that it will never rest until finally realized. People may "accept" the various compulsions of necessity...but, "deep down", we know it sucks!

And however hopeless it may seem, some of us dream that it will someday be otherwise...and strive to make that dream real.

:redstar2000:

The Redstar2000 Papers (http://www.redstar2000papers.fightcapitalism.net)
A site about communist ideas

pandora
15th May 2004, 01:24
Originally posted by [email protected] 14 2004, 05:51 PM
Here is the problem with the "communitarian" approach that Pandora speaks of.

In "communities", people won't mind their own damn business!

You will have no privacy!

And "God" help you if you have a new idea...about anything!

I have but little knowledge of Native American life; but the oppressiveness of small town American life has been widely chronicled. The pressures to conform to "community standards" create a stifling atmosphere.


When we are forced to depend on others we bring out their kindness.

Sometimes. But sometimes their kindness is of the wrong kind.

I recently found myself in a position of (temporary) "forced dependence" on others...and I hated it! The feelings of uncertainty and worry were so great as to nearly immobilize me. I found myself becoming passive and indifferent to everything. It was horrible!

Ah, but doesn't this point back to being raised in a capitalist and highly competitive culture. I remember working in the Filiphino community being discouraged from picking up objects on my own without assistance. The community worked together on a deep level, that meant letting the women touch my hair and back as we worked. At first this caused anger, than frustration, than sorrow. I felt I had been so cut off from this my whole life, I felt cheated. I really enjoyed being enveloped in that culture. I have had similar experiences in many cultures, and when I pull back I am asked directly I know I am acting "White" again.

PS NICE USE OF THE WORD GOD REDSTAR, I may have to report this :P
In Mexico people would ask me directly why U.S. people were so afraid to let people in, and so cold. I never realized how badly until I started leaving for longer and longer. I felt so cold re-entering the United States, the first few days were unbearable, streets that were empty, no life.

Granted, as a female, much more so than you would be as a male, I lost friendships due to such things as having a drink on Christmas! or being seen with males! etc. I hope feminism and like minded doctrines against classism and racism would spread, the ideas of Thomas Paine and Kant should not be thrown out the window, but we have a far way to come back towards community. For these reasons I am a huge supporter of the seperation between church and state.

For Anarchist Tensions: sorry my opinion doesn't fit into your Western "Theological" framework and therefore is deemed invalid. Now please excuse me I have to get to a Pow Wow. :P