Log in

View Full Version : NEW WELFARE REFORM, ACT NOW!!!!



samaniego
6th March 2002, 22:16
President Bushs' Administration is planning to cut welfare aid to familys' and have them work for less than minimum wage, as a way to cut welfare spending. The plan is to take welfare recipients and have them in a work study program pay them a slave wage and teach them to work, unfortunately those who will pay are the children of those on welfare. Welfare has problems but to cut it and give them less to teach them a lesson is not the right way to go.

To stop this PLEASE!!!! write your, Congress person and let them know you are against it, this is vital since it will be coming up for review soon!!!!!

This article is posted in the Los Angeles Times, for more info. LA times 3/6/2002 Front page, or go to latimes.com
Please help those with no voice and no fault the children.

Supermodel
6th March 2002, 22:19
So they will get paid to study? How does that jive with all the students out there who have to pay to study?

samaniego
6th March 2002, 22:29
NOT REALY GETTING PAID TO STUDY. THEY ARE BEING TRAINED TO GET OFF WELFARE, WHICH IS A GOOD THING BUT! THEY WANT TO PAY THEM LESS THAN MINIMUM WAGE. HOW ARE THEY GOING TO BUY FOOD? OR PAY RENT MAKING 3$ AN HOUR?

rebel7609
6th March 2002, 23:35
Do you believe there should be a limit on how long you can recieve welfare?
Do you think that people who have a child while on welfare should get more money for that child?
I'm just trying to gage exactly what you are for or against here.

CheGuevara
6th March 2002, 23:38
Supermodel, I've had enough of your *****y capitalist spew pipe, especially when it's littered with Spanish in your attempt to be cute. ˇYa basta!

samaniego
7th March 2002, 00:15
IM SAYING WELFARE REFORM IS NEEDED, THE GOVT. SHOULD HELP PEOPLE GET OFF WELFARE NO JUST THROW THEM OFF.

AS FOR HAVING A LIMITED TIME ON WELFARE, THEIR SHOULD BE, BUT WITH A CLEAR WARNING, THAT WELFARE IS ONLY TO HELP YOU UNTIL YOU CAN SUSTAIN YOURSELF, NOT A MEANS BY WHICH TO LIVE; WHICH IS WHAT THEY WANT TO DO NOW, IN A VERY UN-HUMAN WAY. WE HAVE LAWS THAT FORBID PAYING A WORKER LESS THAN MINIMUM WAGE AND OUR OWN GOVT. IS SURPASSING THOSE LAWS FOR A QUICK FIX TO A BIG PROBLEM.

AS FOR THE KID'S THEY ARE INNOCENT AND SHOULD BE TAKEN CARE OF.

IN SUMMARY MY MAIN ARGUMENT IS THAT THE GOVT. IS TRYING TO BREAK THE MINIMUM WAGE LAW AND SCREW OVER THE PEOPLE ON WELFARE IN AN ATTEMPT TO FIX THING'S. I KNOW THEIR IS A BETTER SOLUTION. WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Lardlad95
7th March 2002, 03:19
when will people learn, you find the people jobs they don't have time to study while their kids are on the streets at 11 at night. Just find the people jobs they can learn on the job, and don't pay them slave wages, pay them enough to stay financially stable while the government assists in finding them permanant jobs

samaniego
7th March 2002, 04:32
Thats what should be done, but if we don't act now people will be getting nothing.

Lardlad95
7th March 2002, 05:34
yeah but I'm just one man, what can I do (Lardlad looks at the shot gun in his hand) oh yeah (shoots Bush)

Disclaimer to CIA/FBI/Secret Service: I'm not threatening Bush's life. the gn represented the people and shooting represented the people taking power from Bush's moronic self

guerrillaradio
8th March 2002, 15:07
LOL Lardlad.

Disclaimer to CIA: I am in no way affiliated with the terrorist leader Lardlad (obviously he must be a terrorist leader if he's on here!!). By saying LOL I meant I was laughing at his silly ideas of destroying lovely American capitalism. I love George Bush more than anything, honest. And I hate all those grubby Muslims taking the oil rightly meant for you...

Lardlad95
9th March 2002, 03:12
I'm not a terrorist....(puts plutonium under his bed). I've spent my entire life trying to destroy capitalism(emails virus to microsoft) I mean there is nothing I love more than Bush...okay have I lied enough cuz saying I love Bush makes me feel so so dirty

Zippy
9th March 2002, 17:58
Quote: from rebel7609 on 12:35 am on Mar. 7, 2002
Do you believe there should be a limit on how long you can recieve welfare?
Not at all. Welfare should be available for anyone out of work, for aslong as they are out of work. There is a difference between people who arent working and people are fraudulently taking from the government.

As for Bush's plans; suprise suprise.

Zippy.