Log in

View Full Version : A new revolution



Pirro
6th May 2004, 01:22
I have had this question stuck in my head for a really long time and I really think of an answer.
Do you think that Che would have wanted someone to keep fighting against capitalism after his death?

Organic Revolution
6th May 2004, 02:59
im sorry... but i have to laugh at this one..... ha ha ha.... of course he did, he was a bloody communist.

scrap metal
6th May 2004, 03:57
I'm sure he would vaule actions over words any time. Talking about it and doing it are two COMPLETELY differnt things. Che did it, and I'm sure he would respect the same.

SittingBull47
7th May 2004, 16:00
heh, yea i agree. There's no way in hell that he WOULDN'T want somebody to fight in the name of communism.

robob8706
7th May 2004, 16:02
That's like asking, Did Jesus really want us to be like him after he did?

robob8706
7th May 2004, 16:03
Correction : ...after he died...

Le Libérer
7th May 2004, 16:25
I really dont see a connection between Jesus and Che.

I believe Che would be astounded at the fact he has become the image connected to freedom of the masses, world wide.

RebeldePorLaPAZ
7th May 2004, 22:00
http://www.che-lives.com/home/modules.php?...=showpage&pid=8 (http://www.che-lives.com/home/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=8)

I think it is very clear. I think that if you live up to what he says in here than you are un Guevaraista. Por que no?

--Paz

Fidel Castro
8th May 2004, 01:51
I am sure Che would have wanted the revolutionary cause to continue after his death, and I am sure he would approve of many revolutionary actions that have taken place since his death.

I doubt that Che held the oppinion that revolutionary struggle would die with himself.

Yazman
8th May 2004, 13:40
Originally posted by Debora [email protected] 8 2004, 02:25 AM
I really dont see a connection between Jesus and Che.
There doesn't need to be, IT WAS AN EXAMPLE.

SittingBull47
8th May 2004, 17:43
Argentinian nuns saw a likeness between jesus and Che, that's somewhat relevant.

Rasta Sapian
9th May 2004, 16:14
As long as people remain strong and true to their hearts, capitalism will likewise have a strong opposition; and the spirit of Che will live on.............

emmissary
15th May 2004, 05:42
The answer is simple and some of you may hate me for saying this: Che was not the Revolution. Yes we are followers of Ernesto, but we must understand that without him a revolution was inevitable. Che taught us important lessons, and the most important, that the revolution lives strong witin all of us. Che only taught us to open our mouths and raise our voices! We are the revolution!!!!! Hasta la victoria siempre!

Kurai Tsuki
3rd June 2004, 02:16
Yeah, of course. He wasn't the type of person to want to take all of the glory, he often downlplayed his own actions in his wrttings. Che was not fighitng for his own honour but to remove U.S. backed dictatorships from power. This was his primary goal, probably more than, "fighting capitalism." The dictatorships which America backed were capitalistic and friendly to American interests. I think to call it, "fighting capitalism," is to oversimplify it for people who don't know as much about American interventionism. Most people can easilly grasp what capitalism is, but America's dictatorship and coup-backing require taking the time to read, which many do not seem inclined to do.

Che was as much of an anti-Imperialist as, and in fact before, he was a communist.

bunk
3rd June 2004, 08:23
of course, in the tricontinental he called for 2 or 3 vietnams.

Kurai Tsuki
3rd June 2004, 21:48
He may have also made the US government hate him even more when he made referances to fighting American soldiers.